|
|
|
| Effect comparison of hysteroscopic tissue resection system and traditional hysteroscopic electrotomy in the treatment of placenta implantation |
| WEI Jing |
| Department of Gynaecology, Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330006, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the effect of comparison of hysteroscopic tissue resection system and traditional hysteroscopic electrotomy in the treatment of placenta implantation. Methods A total of 61 cases of placenta implantation patients admitted to our hospital from February 2017 to February 2019 were selected as the study objects, and they were divided into the control group (30 cases) and the observation group (31 cases) according to the odd even number of inpatients. The control group were used to traditional hysteroscopic electrotomy, the observation group were used to Myosure hysteroscopic tissue resection. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, ventilation fluid amount,the rate of secondary operation, the days of menstruation after operation, the incidence of postoperative intrauterine adhesions and the rate of cure were compared between the two groups. Results The operation time of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group, intraoperative bleeding volume, ventilation fluid amount, the days of menstruation after operation of the observation group were less than those of the control group, the rate of secondary operation and the incidence of postoperative intrauterine adhesions of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, the differences were statistical significance (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of cure between the two groups (P＞0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional hysteroscopic electrotomy, the operation time of hysteroscopic tissue resection system in the treatment of placental implantation is shorter, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, the amount of distended fluid, the number of days of menstruation after operation are less, the rate of secondary operation and the incidence of postoperative intrauterine adhesions are lower.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
侯旭飞.宫腔镜清除术与美奥舒宫腔镜组织切除系统治疗难治性宫内残留的临床对比研究[J].中国处方药，2019，16（9）：129-130.
|
| [2] |
Scheiber MD，Chen SH.A prospective multicenter registry of patients undergoing hysteroscopic morcellation of uterine polyps and myomas[J].J Gynecol Surg，2016，32（6）：318-323.
|
| [3] |
张会莉.宫腔镜下子宫肌瘤电切术与腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床对比研究[J].国际医药卫生导报，2016，22（6）：771-772.
|
| [4] |
Hickmann A K，Gaida B J，Reisch R.How I do it：the expanded trans/supraorbital approach for large space-occupying lesions of the anterior fossa[J].Acta Neurochir （Wien），2017，159（5）：881-887.
|
| [5] |
王艳双，刘亚光，车昊，等.妊娠合并肺动脉高压患者行剖宫产围术期稳定血流动力学麻醉干预与性激素水平的研究[J].心肺血管病杂志，2017，36（2）：114-118.
|
| [6] |
李志理，张诗文.宫腔镜电切术治疗子宫内膜息肉致异常子宫出血的安全性及疗效分析[J].临床医学工程，2017，24（7）：1509-1510.
|
| [7] |
庄海颜.经子宫动脉氨甲喋呤灌注、栓塞联合宫腔镜下清宫术治疗胎盘植入[J].实用临床医学，2018，19（1）：54-55，59.
|
| [8] |
中华医学会围产医学分会，中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组.胎盘植入诊治指南（2015）[J].中华妇产科杂志，2015，50（12）：970-972.
|
| [9] |
叶凤如，黄玉玲，王武，等.子宫内膜息肉宫腔镜电切术后疗效及妊娠结局分析[J].临床医学工程，2017，24（4）：463-464.
|
| [10] |
张艳萍.宫腔镜电切联合球囊、MTX 联合米非司酮治疗部分性胎盘植入的优劣差异[J].中国医药科学，2018，8（6）：74-77.
|
| [11] |
陈丽，樊晓君，王莉.胎盘植入行经子宫动脉氨甲喋呤灌注、栓塞联合宫腔镜下清宫术的临床分析[J].中国计划生育和妇产科，2016，8（1）：45-48.
|
| [12] |
Cruz SM，Akinkuotu AC，Cass DL，et al.Space occupying lesions in the presence of congenital diaphragmatic hernia[J].J Pediatr Surg，2016，51（5）：710-713.
|
| [13] |
沈惠.胎盘植入相关因素分析及宫腔镜治疗的疗效观察[J].中国妇幼保健，2016，31（1）：69-70.
|
| [14] |
韦艳芬，李宁.部分性胎盘植入两种保守治疗方法的临床疗效对比[J].广西医学，2016，38（3）：406-408.
|
| [15] |
张印星，潘春燕，陈小刚.子宫动脉灌注化疗与宫腔镜下病灶电切术治疗瘢痕妊娠的疗效分析[J].河北医药，2016，38（13）：1940-1942.
|
| [16] |
林启玉，江少如，林婉.美奥舒宫腔镜组织切除系统治疗宫内良性病变的临床研究[J].现代医院，2018，18（3）：388-390.
|
| [17] |
卢艳，崔超美，李雪英.美奥舒宫腔内组织切除系统在产后胎盘残留的临床应用价值[J].湖南师范大学学报（医学版），2017，14（3）：46-48.
|
| [18] |
孙冬岩，王燕，姚冬梅，等.美奥舒组织切除系统治疗宫内良性占位病变的临床分析[J].现代妇产科进展，2017，26（6）：463-464，467.
|
|
|
|
