腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的效果对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (29 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract objective To compare the clinical effect of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy and open-type tension-free herniorrhaphy in the treatment of adult inguinal hernia.Methods A total of 72 patients with inguinal hernia who were treated in our hospital from June 2017 to June 2018 were selected as the research subjects, they were divided into observation group and control group by random number table method, with 36 cases in each group.Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy was used in the observation group, and open-type tension-free herniorrhaphy was used in the control group.The general operative conditions, postoperative complications and postoperative follow-up of the two groups were compared.Results The operation time, postoperative pain duration, the time of out of bed and hospitalization days in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, the amount of intraoperative bleeding and the times of painkiller use in the observation group were fewer than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).The total incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 8.33%, which was lower than that in the control group (25.00%), the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The time of disappearance of foreign body sensation in groin, induration of groin and numbness in the observation group were shorter than that in the control group, and the incidence of thrombosis and recurrence of hernia in femoral vein were lower than that in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is effective in the treatment of adult inguinal hernia, with fewer postoperative complications, which is worthy of clinical application.

Key words： Laparoscopic Open-type Tension-free herniorrhaphy Adult inguinal hernia

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIU Kai
	ZUO Wu
	WANG Bin
	YANG Xiao-feng

Cite this article:

LIU Kai,ZUO Wu,WANG Bin, et al. Effect comparison of the of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy and open-type tension-free herniorrhaphy in the treatment of adult inguinal hernia[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(11): 70-72.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2020/V27/I11/70

[1]	赵健，郭天康.腹腔镜与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人复发性腹股沟疝效Meta分析[J].中国实用外科杂志，2015，35（1）：86-93.
[2]	李凯，许光中，王桐生，等.两种开放式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的比较研究[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志电子版，2016，10（1）：21-24.
[3]	时立平.腹膜外腹腔镜疝气修补术与腹膜前间隙无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果[J].中外医学研究，2017，15（24）：126-127.
[4]	戴鹏，林云，艾秋宝.无张力疝气修补术与传统疝气修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效对比[J].中国现代医生，2016，54（23）：40-42.
[5]	黄胜兵，陈世莲，李铁.无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝[J].长春中医药大学学报，2016，32（3）：618-619.
[6]	张红阳.腹腔镜与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝效果的系统评价[J].中外医学研究，2017，15（32）：166-168.
[7]	张云，郝晓晖，李健文，等.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J].中华消化外科杂志，2016，15（10）：967-971.
[9]	赵俊立，马伟琳，宋媛媛.腹腔镜与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人复发性腹股沟疝的疗效分析[J].临床医学，2016，36（5）：82-83.
[10]	陶红光，宗华.腹腔镜疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的疗效观察[J].中国当代医药，2016，23 （25）：22-24.
[11]	石俊忠，庄建彬，孙惠军，等.腹股沟疝无张力修补术患者预防性应用抗生素的临床观察及其意义[J].吉林大学学报（医学版），2017，43（3）：622-625.
[8]	Schmedt CG，Sauerland S，Bittner R.Comparison of endoscopic procedures vs Lichtenstein and other open mesh techniques for in-guinal hernia repair：a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Surg Endosc，2005，19（2）：188-199.
[12]	高春玲，刘晓慧，朱文嘉，等.腹股沟疝无张力修补术后医院感染的病原菌分布特征与耐药性分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志，2017，27（5）：1101-1104.
[13]	Vidovic D，KiracI，Glavan E，et al.Laparoscopic totally extraperi-toneal hernia repair versus open Lichtenstein hernia repair：results and complications[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A，2007，17（5）：585-590.
[14]	江福标.腹腔镜疝修补术与传统疝无张力修补术治疗腹股沟疝效果比较[J].河南外科学杂志，2017，23（2）：114-115.
[15]	方楚锟，马越群，魏少阳.不同方式无张力疝修补治疗腹股沟疝气的临床疗效观察[J].中国伤残医学，2016，24（15）：49-50.