单侧与双侧椎弓根钉内固定脊柱融合术在脊柱退行性疾病中的临床应用效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (38 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of spinal fusion with unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation in spinal degenerative diseases.Methods From June 2017 to March 2019,40 patients who met the diagnostic criteria of spinal degenerative diseases were selected as the subjects of the study,they were randomly divided into group A(20 cases)and group B(20 cases)by the random digital table method.Group A was treated with unilateral pedicle screw,and group B was treated with bilateral pedicle screw.The length of operation,the amount of bleeding,the length of hospitalization and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.The changes of visual analogue scale(VAS)score of waist and leg visual analog score and the changes of Oswestry disability index(ODI)score of the two groups were observed.Results The operation time and hospitalization time of group A were shorter than those of group B,and the amount of bleeding of group A was less than that of group B,the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in postoperative fusion rate between the two groups(P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(P＞0.05).In addition,after surgical treatment,the VAS score and ODI score of waist and leg in the two groups were lower than those before operation,the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS score and ODI score between the two groups after operation(P＞0.05).Conclusion The operative effect of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw internal fixation spinal fusion is similar in the treatment of spinal degenerative diseases,but unilateral pedicle screw internal fixation has the advantages of short operation time,less bleeding and short hospitalization time,which is worthy of further clinical study and application.

Key words： Unilateral Bilateral Spinal degenerative disease Pedicle screw Spinal fusion Randomized controlled study

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Tian-he
	CHEN Xiao-hu
	GUO Qiang
	YANG Zhong-han

Cite this article:

CHEN Tian-he,CHEN Xiao-hu,GUO Qiang, et al. Comparison of the clinical effect of spinal fusion with unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation in spinal degenerative diseases[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(10): 105-108.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2020/V27/I10/105

[2]	Ehrlich GE.Back pain[J].J Rheumatol Suppl，2003，6（7）：26-31.
[3]	陈书爱.单侧与双侧椎弓根内固定治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出的效果观察[J].白求恩医学杂志，2018，16（6）：576-577.
[4]	黄伟，尹毅，单辉强，等.单侧椎弓根螺钉固定结合肾形融合器椎体间融合治疗退行性腰椎疾病[J].实用骨科杂志，2019，25（7）：629-632.
[5]	张长成，王峰，刘瑜，等.微创下单侧椎弓根钉固定与传统开放式双侧固定在单间隙腰椎管狭窄症的疗效对比[J].颈腰痛杂志，2018，39（4）：441-444.
[6]	史舅生，张国平，方文，等.单侧与双侧椎弓根钉内固定椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志，2018，33（3）：292-294.
[7]	郑义朋，李克鹏.经椎间孔单侧融合联合单侧椎弓根钉固定治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的疗效观察[J].颈腰痛杂志，2018，39（1）：68-70.
[8]	汤国庆，张征石，陈吉，等.单侧和双侧椎弓根螺钉固定经椎间孔椎体间融合术治疗椎间盘突出症伴腰椎不稳的疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志，2017，20（6）：665-667，672.
[9]	汤旭日，马安军，傅弛，等.单侧与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定对行TLIF 治疗的腰椎退行性病变患者的效果比较[J].中华全科医学，2017，15（6）：965-967.
[10]	程飞.TLIF 单侧与双侧椎弓根钉固定疗效：系统回顾和Meta 分析[D].蚌埠：蚌埠医学院，2017.
[11]	丁一，潘爱星，张扬璞，等.后入路腰椎单侧或双侧椎弓根螺钉内固定术联合椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病研究进展[J].中国骨与关节杂志，2019，8（2）：141-144.
[12]	毛路.腰椎后路非对称固定经椎间孔椎体间融合的基础及临床研究[D].苏州：苏州大学，2013：35.
[13]	林伟文，赖茂松，熊浩，等.单侧与双侧椎弓根螺钉联合微创经椎间孔椎体间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效和影像学比较[J].中国实用医药，2019，14（20）：62-65.
[14]	杨贤玉，张长江，李洪珂，等.单侧或双侧椎弓根螺钉联合经椎间孔椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床研究[J].中国医学工程，2015，23（5）：177-178.
[1]	王翀，方明桥，项光恒，等.单侧与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定联合经椎间孔椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的长期疗效比较[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志，2014，24（9）：795-801.
[15]	成东亮.单侧椎弓根螺钉固定联合椎间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症效果观察[J].河南外科学杂志，2017，23（5）：117-118.