|
|
|
| Anesthetic effect comparison between Fentanyl and low-dose Dextrozine combined with Propofol in painless artificial abortion |
| LI Shu-tao1 ZHU Qing-dan2 |
1. Department of Anesthesiology, Bao′an District Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Shenzhen City, Ji′nan University, Guangdong Province, Shenzhen 518102, China;
2. Department of Obstetrics, Bao′an District Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Shenzhen City, Ji′nan University, Guangdong Province, Shenzhen 518102, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To study the anesthetic effect between Fentanyl and low-dose Dextrozine combined with Propofol in painless artificial abortion. Methods A total of 200 patients undergoing artificial abortion in gynecological outpatient clinic of our hospital from June 2018 to June 2019 were selected as research objects, and they were divided into experimental group and control group according to the random number table method, with 100 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were given Fentanyl combined with Propofol for anesthesia, and patients in the experimental group were given low-dose Dextrozine combined with Propofol for anesthesia. The heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and blood oxygen saturation before surgery, after anesthesia, and after waking in two groups of patients were compared. The analgesic effect and incidence of postoperative adverse reactions in two groups of patients were observed. Results There were no significant differences in heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and blood oxygen saturation between the experimental group and the control group before surgery, after anesthesia, and after waking (P＞0.05). The total effective rate of analgesia in the experimental group was 98.00%, which was higher than the 90.00% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The total incidence rate of adverse reactions in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion Low-dose Dextrozine combined with Propofol for anesthesia has a good clinical effect in painless artificial abortion. The patients′vital signs are stable, which can effectively improve the analgesic effect, reduce the pain score, and have fewer adverse reactions after surgery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
周波，魏玉，何芸.丙泊酚联合小剂量地佐辛在无痛人流术中的应用[J].海南医学，2018，29（6）：862-864.
|
| [2] |
朱炜，杨明镜，江培颜.右美托咪定联合地佐辛在小儿扁桃体和腺样体摘除术中的应用价值[J].医学综述，2019，25（1）：202-207.
|
| [3] |
魏胜泰，梁进才，杨发桂，等.3 种麻醉诱导方式在肝硬化患者无痛胃镜中的应用效果评价[J].北京医学，2018，40（11）：1088-1090.
|
| [4] |
魏会霞，罗向红.地佐辛与盐酸右美托咪定预防小儿术后躁动的效果比较[J].医药导报，2018，37（1）：67-70.
|
| [5] |
郑坤.芬太尼、舒芬太尼、瑞芬太尼对全身麻醉诱导循环的影响比较[J].中外医学研究，2019，17（18）：154-156.
|
| [6] |
郁文.丙泊酚注射液与地佐辛注射液对全麻下手术患者术后苏醒期躁动及术后镇痛的影响[J].中国临床药理学杂志，2017，33（19）：1903-1905.
|
| [7] |
李继成，周海峰.地佐辛联合丙泊酚用于无痛人工流产术的麻醉效果[J].中国医院用药评价与分析，2017，17（9）：1191-1192，1195.
|
| [8] |
张敏，黄礼兵.地佐辛复合丙泊酚在乳房肿块切除术中的临床效果[J].实用临床医药杂志，2017，21（11）：168-169.
|
| [9] |
陆灿源.瑞芬太尼复合七氟烷用于骨科手术无肌松全麻维持的观察研究分析[J].临床检验杂志（电子版），2019，8（3）：25-27.
|
| [10] |
李敏.瑞芬太尼与舒芬太尼靶控输注在腹腔镜手术麻醉中作用的对比分析[J].中外医学研究，2019，17（16）：26-28.
|
| [11] |
陈芳，李洪，杜智勇，等.地佐辛联合舒芬太尼用于脊柱矫形术后镇痛的研究[J].局解手术学杂志，2016，25（10）：724-728.
|
| [12] |
韦安济.舒芬太尼腰硬联合阻滞麻醉在剖宫产麻醉及镇痛效果分析[J]. 中外医疗，2018，37（10）：17-19.
|
| [13] |
杨永斌，杨秀梅.芬太尼复合丙泊酚麻醉在小儿支气管异物取出术中的应用效果[J].陕西医学杂志，2019，48（7）：882-884，889.
|
| [14] |
吕虎，陈万坤，赵燕君，等.地佐辛或氟比洛芬酯复合丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼静脉麻醉在子宫颈癌前病变锥切术中麻醉效果的比较[J].中国癌症杂志，2018，28（2）：146-150.
|
| [15] |
罗振国，白莉平，李伟，等.地佐辛联合氟比洛芬酯、氯胺酮在宫腔镜手术中的应用[J].陕西医学杂志，2017，46（11）：1596-1598.
|
|
|
|
