|
|
Application effect of hierarchical management in bedside wheelchair for patients with severe pneumonia in ICU |
XU Zhen-hu1 MAO Xiu-lian2 LI Shi-peng3 ZENG Wei-bo1 CHEN Wen-ting1 XIE Jia-xin1 |
1.Comprehensive ICU, Guangdong Agricultural Reclamation Center Hospital, Guangdong Province, Zhanjiang 524002, China;
2.Department of Nursing, Guangdong Agricultural Reclamation Center Hospital, Guangdong Province,Zhanjiang 524002, China;
3.Operating Room,.Guangdong Agricultural Reclamation Center Hospital, Guangdong Province, Zhanjiang 524002, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the application effect of hierarchical management in bedside wheelchair for severe pneumonia patients in ICU.Methods A total of 82 patients with severe pneumonia in our hospital from June 2017 to May 2018 were selected.According to the order of admission, the odd number of patients with severe pneumonia were treated as the experimental group, and the double number were the control group, 41 cases in each group.The experimental group was included in the study after using hierarchical classification criteria, the control group was included in the study after using nurses to evaluate their activity ability independently.The success rate of wheelchair, the effect of early exercise, the change of negative emotions and nursing satisfaction were observed in the two groups.Results The success rate of wheelchair in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group.The difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.51, P<0.05).Barthel index score, quality of life scale (SAQ)-activity limitation score were compared with the control group at the time of transfer, there was no significant difference (P>0.05).The Barthel index score and the SAQ-activity limitation score of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group at exit, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) score and self-rating depression scale (SDS) score of the experimental group compared with those of the control group at the time of transfer,there was no significant difference (P>0.05).The SAS score and SDS score of the experimental group at exit were lower than those of the control group and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The total satisfaction of nursing in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=3.90, P<0.05).Conclusion The implementation of early activity programs such as bedside wheelchair can decrease the anxiety and depression of patients with severe pneumonia in ICU, and improve the early activity function of patients and raise the satisfaction of nursing, which is worth promoting.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Mizgerd JP.Pathogenesis of severe pneumonia:advances and knowledge gaps[J].Cur Opin Pul Med,2017,23(3):193-197.
|
[2] |
吴青青.早期康复治疗对重症肺炎机械通气患者脱机成功率及脱机时间的影响[J].临床合理用药,2019,12(2):105-106.
|
[3] |
王宇娇,高岚,王永红.ICU机械通气患者早期主动活动最佳证据的应用研究[J].中华护理杂志,2018,53(11):1285-1291.
|
[4] |
杨丽平,张志刚,张彩云,等.早期活动对机械通气患者病死率影响的积累Meta分析[J].中华护理杂志,2019,54(6):843-849.
|
[5] |
张高峰,乔祺,许澎,等.Barthel 评分对高龄急性冠状动脉综合征患者介入治疗预后的评估价值[J].中国临床医学,2018,25(6):879-883.
|
[6] |
马文华,赵玉梅.心血管病住院患者伴抑郁或焦虑的影响因素与护理对策[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2019,25(7):96-98.
|
[7] |
高翔,严静,蔡国龙,等.老年重症肺炎机械通气患者预后影响因素分析[J].浙江医学,2015,37(17):1446-1448.
|
[8] |
周兴强,徐治波.有创机械通气的重症肺炎患者早期肺康复的研究进展[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志,2016,11(6):617-619.
|
[9] |
万娜,张春艳,贾燕瑞.12例重症肺炎患者体外膜氧合联合连续肾脏替代治疗的护理[J].护理学报,2015,22(14):44-47.
|
[10] |
陈立萍,韦秀霞,尹琴.家属不同探视时长在ICU 中的干预研究[J].护士进修杂志,2018,33(10):915-917.
|
[11] |
岳萌,姚培宇,崔楚云,等.机械通气患者早期活动效果的系统评价[J].中华护理杂志,2016,51(5):551-557.
|
[12] |
Lao CD,Huang YC,Lin LF,et al.Body mass index and functional mobility outcome following early rehabilitation after a total knee replacement:a retrospective study in taiwan[J].Arthrit Care Res,2015,67(6):799-808.
|
[13] |
郑燕梅,张桂宁.早期活动对ICU 患者焦虑抑郁情绪改善的效果研究[J].岭南急诊医学杂志,2019,24(1):78-80.
|
[14] |
Christina Amidei.Mobilisation in critical care:A concept analysis[J].Intensive Crit Care Nurs,2012,28(2):73-81.
|
[15] |
梅婷,侯香传,柳静静,等.多团队合作的早期活动干预在老年重症肺炎病人中的应用效果评价[J].全科护理,2017,15(31):3872-3875.
|
|
|
|