药物流产与无痛人工流产术终止早期妊娠的效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (16)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (33 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To explore the clinical effect of medical abortion and painless abortion in termination of early pregnancy. Methods Sixty patients who were required to terminate early pregnancy in our hospital from May 2018 to July 2019 were selected and divided into drug group and operation group according to random number method, with 30 cases in each group. Drug group used Mifepristone and Misoprostolto terminate early pregnancy, and operation group adopted painless abortion after intravenous anesthesia of propofol. The postoperative abortion effects, vaginal bleeding volume, bleeding time and menstrual recovery time were compared between the two groups, and postoperative adverse reactions were monitored. Results After operation, the abortion rate of patients in operation group was 93.33%, higher than that in drug group (70.00%), and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The vaginal bleeding volume of patients in operation group was lower than that in drug group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05),and the bleeding time and menstrual recovery time were shorter than those in drug group , the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). The painlessness ratiosin in operation group was higher than that in drug group, and the pain degree of patients in operation group was lower than that in drug group, and the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05). The rates of total adverse reactions in operation group was lower than that in drug group (6.67% vs 26.67%),and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion The use of painless abortion to terminate early pregnancy can significantly improve complete abortion rate, with high safety, shorten bleeding time and menstrual recovery time, and reduce pain and reduce adverse reactions, with good application value.

Key words： Termination of pregnancy Medical abortion Painless abortion Clinical effect

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	DING Jiang-ling

Cite this article:

DING Jiang-ling. Effect comparison of medical abortion and painless abortion in termination of early pregnancy[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(6): 110-112.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2020/V27/I6/110

[1]	付立芝.药物流产与无痛人工流产术终止早期妊娠的临床疗效对比评价[J].实用妇科内分泌杂志（电子版），2019，6（2）：41-42.
[2]	谢忠珊.用无痛人工流产手术和药物流产法终止早期妊娠的效果对比[J].当代医药论丛，2017，15（12）：92-93.
[3]	李汉福，肖锋，苏丽媚.药物流产与无痛人工流产术终止早期妊娠的临床疗效对比[J].现代诊断与治疗，2016，27（3）：415-417.
[4]	戚秀娟.无痛人流与药物流产终止早期妊娠的疗效比较[J].世界最新医学信息文摘，2017，17（66）：51-52.
[5]	薛琦霞，乔桃.药物流产与无痛人流术的效果对比分析[J].世界最新医学信息文摘，2017，17（64）：69.
[6]	刘福先.无痛人工流产术终止早期妊娠的效果及对孕妇心理健康的影响[J].中国妇幼保健，2017，32（14）：3279-3281.
[7]	吕淑芹.用药物流产术和无痛人工流产术终止早期妊娠的效果对比[J].当代医药论丛，2018，16（12）：163-164.
[8]	高宝侠，刘润润，崔绪琴，等.药物流产与人工流产对未婚非意愿妊娠女性焦虑、抑郁情绪的影响对比研究[J].中国妇幼健康研究，2017，28（6）：641-643.
[9]	汤兰.无痛人工流产的临床应用[J].临床医药文献电子杂志，2017，4（68）：13322-13323.
[10]	刘建平.分析无痛人工流产与药物流产的临床疗效及安全性[J].世界最新医学信息文摘，2018，18（36）：105.
[11]	高美.药物流产与无痛人工流产术终止早期妊娠的临床效果比较[J].海峡药学，2017，29（8）：102-103.
[12]	陈蓉，桑晓梅.药物流产辅以清宫术与无痛人工流产术终止早期妊娠的临床疗效比较[J].医学综述，2015，21（10）：1903-1904.
[13]	贺盛红.人工流产术与药物流产术终止早期妊娠的效果对比[J].中国社区医师，2017，33（2）：78.
[14]	王秀红.药物流产与无痛人工流产术终止早期妊娠的疗效对比[J].临床合理用药杂志，2015，8（12）：107-108.
[15]	杨芳.无痛人工流产与药物流产的临床疗效及安全性[J].智慧健康，2018，4（29）：66-68.
[16]	黎燕翠.无痛人工流产与药物流产的应用效果分析[J].中国社区医师，2017，33（8）：57，69.