瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩的可行性及安全性分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (33 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To analyze the feasibility and safety of vaginal delivery in the pregnancy of scar uterus.Methods The clinical data of 200 maternal women admitted to ourhospital from July to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.According to the different modes of delivery, the patients were divided into study group (n=100) and the control group (n=100).In the study group, vaginal delivery was used, while in the control group, patients with scar uterus underwent caesarean section delivery.The maternal prognosis, postpartum hemorrhage, incidence of puerperal infection and neonatal prognosis were compared between the two groups.Results The bleeding volume of the study group was(151.54±29.79) ml, less than that of the control group ([296.90±74.25]ml).The hospitalization time was (3.05±0.60) d in the study group,shorter than that of the control group ([7.19±0.59]d).The hospitalization cost was (2962.27±460.45) yuan in the study group, lower than that of the control group ([5526.42±420.70]yuan), with statistical differerces (P＜0.05).There was no uterine rupture in the two groups.The incidence of postpartum hemorrhage in the study group was 4%and the incidence of puerperal infection was 0%, which were lower than those of the control group of 12% and 5% (P＜0.05).The Apgar scores of the newborns and neonatal weight in the study and control groups were (9.22±0.60) and(9.36±0.67) points, and (3322.39±201.05) and (3382.09±246.93) g.The incidence of neonatal wet lung was 0% and 2%in the two groups, without statistical differences (P＞0.05).Conclusion Reasonable grasp of indications, vaginal delivery in pregnant women with scar uterus is feasible and safe, and the effect of postpartum recovery is remarkable.

Key words： Scar uterus Vaginal delivery Prognostic value Postpartum hemorrhage Puerperal infection Effect analysis

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIAO Gui-lian
	LIU Lan-yun
	GUO Fang-fang

Cite this article:

LIAO Gui-lian,LIU Lan-yun,GUO Fang-fang. Analysis of feasibility and safety of vaginal delivery in scar pregnancy[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(8): 93-95.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2020/V27/I8/93

[1]	冼洁凤.阴式子宫瘢痕妊娠病灶清除术治疗剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的临床效果观察[J].中国医药科学，2018，8（8）：85-87.
[2]	汪新妮，彭幼，周婷婷，等.剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠治疗方法的探讨[J].中国医药科学，2017，7（6）：67-70.
[3]	何锦卿，骆韬平.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠患者阴道分娩的安全性及护理方法分析[J].中国医药科学，2019，9（6）：140-142.
[4]	王洋，苑桂姝，李如凯.对比两种断脐方法对阴道分娩的新生儿血红蛋白及血清胆红素水平的影响[J].中国医药科学，2019，9（6）：108-110.
[5]	张祖艳，夏小文，明艳，等.初次妊娠不同产程剖宫产与再次妊娠早产的关系研究[J].中国医药科学，2018，8（18）：75-78，192.
[6]	李雪群.护理干预对瘢痕子宫再次妊娠阴道分娩的影响效果观察[J].中国实用医药，2018，13（20）：175-176.
[7]	温银笑，温月香.阴道分娩后尿潴留的相关因素分析及盆底康复干预效果[J].中国医药科学，2018，8（10）：128-130.
[8]	朱皎玲.预见性护理对阴道分娩产后出血发生率的干预意义探究[J].中国医药指南，2018，16（10）：245-246.
[9]	刘娟.经阴道分娩产妇产后出血的护理及原因分析[J].中国医药指南，2018，16（12）：244.
[9]	徐素君，陈敏，陈立新，等.米非司酮配伍卡前列甲酯、乳酸依沙吖啶和水囊在瘢痕子宫中期妊娠引产中的可行性比较[J].中国性科学，2017，26（1）：112-115.
[10]	蒋凤芳，李怡澄，赵赛婉，等.疤痕子宫患者再次剖宫产术后产褥感染的危险因素与病原学和耐药性分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志，2017，27（7）：1608-1611.
[11]	郑玉玲，汪涵，宋启敏，等.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠患者下段肌壁厚度及分娩间隔时间与阴道试产结局的关系[J].中华全科医学，2017，15（8）：1451-1453，1456.
[12]	王安.卡前列素氨丁三醇注射液防治瘢痕子宫合并前置胎盘再次剖宫产术中出血的效果[J].中国妇幼保健，2017，32（16）：3969-3971.
[13]	高世华.剖宫产后瘢痕子宫再次妊娠孕妇接受阴道试产的影响因素及不同模式分娩的妊娠结局分析[J].中国妇幼保健，2017，32（11）：2341-2344.
[14]	张媛媛，辛辉.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠的高龄产妇经阴道分娩的安全性和可行性分析[J].安徽医药，2019，23（3）：530-533.
[15]	杨青.瘢痕子宫再次妊娠的高龄产妇经阴道分娩的安全性和可行性分析[J].健康之友，2019，（10）：177-178.