躁动镇静评分在重症医学科机械通气患者中的应用效果

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (33 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To explore the application effect of score of agitation and sedation in patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU.Methods A total of 80 cases of mechanical ventilation patients hospitalized in ICU of our hospital from January to March 2019 were selected.According to random number table method,they were divided into control group and study group,40 cases in each group.The control group was evaluated according to nurses′ subjective experience,and the experimental group was evaluated by score of agitation and sedation.The total incidence of adverse events,duration of mechanical ventilation,duration of sedation and duration of endotracheal intubation extraction were compared between the two groups.Results The total incidence of adverse events in the study group (15.00%) was lower than that in the control group (40.00%),the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The duration of mechanical ventilation,sedative drug use and endotracheal intubation extraction were shorter in the study group than those of the control group,with statistical differences (P＜0.05).Conclusion Using score of restlessness and sedation can effectively evaluate the restlessness and sedation of patients,shorten the treatment time of patients and reduce the incidence of adverse events.It is worthy of use in clinical practice.

Key words： Agitation sedation score Critical Care Medicine Mechanical ventilation Application effect

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHANG Di-ying
	FAN Liu
	SUN Hong-guo

Cite this article:

ZHANG Di-ying,FAN Liu,SUN Hong-guo. Application effect of score of restlessness and sedation in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(1): 197-199.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2020/V27/I1/197

[1]	蒋玲洁，张志刚.右美托咪定对无创机械通气患者镇静效果的Meta 分析[J].中国药物评价，2019，36（1）：65-72.
[2]	营晓，张海燕，路潜.术后机械通气患者吸痰操作疼痛现状及影响因素研究[J].中华护理杂志，2018，53（5）：537-542.
[3]	朱明明，刘芳，王冉.躁动镇静评分在重症患者中应用的研究进展[J].中华护理杂志，2018，53（2）：247-250.
[4]	白杨.右美托咪定对重症监护室机械通气患者脱机时躁动的预防效果[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志，2018，3（4）：172，181.
[5]	钟映玉，肖百芳.脑电双频指数结合Ramsay、SAS 评分对机械通气患者镇静的监测评价[J].海南医学，2017，28（22）：3720-3722.
[6]	李星.右美托咪定用于ICU 术后机械通气患者镇静镇痛的临床观察[J].临床合理用药杂志，2017，10（32）：73-74.
[7]	黄晓丽，封凯旋.右美托咪定预防重症监护室机械通气患者脱机时躁动疗效观察[J].中国药业，2017，26（8）：26-28.
[8]	刘福菁，杨巧云，刘文明.右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于ICU 术后机械通气患者的镇静镇痛作用比较[J].临床医药文献电子杂志，2017，4（68）：13 411.
[9]	李焕夷，罗琼湘，邓春桃.咪达唑仑-丙泊酚序贯给药在机械通气患者程序化镇静中的应用[J].中国当代医药，2017，24（21）：53-55，68.
[10]	袁灵，姚国媛，邓小利.序贯镇静对重症哮喘患者每日唤醒的安全性评估[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志，2017，5（18）：46.
[11]	侯晓营，邓妍.Richmond 躁动-镇静量表用于胸外科ICU术后机械通气患者的效果观察[J].中国临床护理，2017，9（3）：224-226.
[12]	程照丽，陈永莉，杨凤梅.Ramsay 评分在ICU 机械通气患者镇静护理中的应用探讨[J].中国现代医药杂志，2015，17（11）：80-82.
[13]	张友华，吕光宇，张磊.右美托咪定与丙泊酚在心脏术后患者机械通气中应用的对比研究[J].中国临床新医学，2015，8（5）：419-422.
[14]	隗颖，张文敏，赵炳朕.镇静-躁动评分在预防ICU 机械通气患者非计划性拔管中的应用[J].护理学报，2013，20（16）：44-46.
[15]	吕魏潇，张旭珍.右美托咪定联合咪达唑仑用于ICU 机械通气患者的镇静观察及护理[J].海峡药学，2013，25（5）：218-219.