腹腔镜与开放性腹壁切口疝修补术的疗效对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (37 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic and open incisional hernia repair in patients with abdominal incisional hernia. Methods The clinical data of 61 patients who underwent abdominal incisional hernia surgery in our hospital from February 2011 to January 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into the laparoscopic group (30 cases) and the open group (31 cases) according to the surgical approach. The intraoperative bleeding volume, the operation time, the rate of using drainage tube, the postoperative pain (the duration of analgesics use), the first flatus time, the incidence of postoperative complication, the length of postoperative hospital stay, the chronic pain rate and the recurrence rate were compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative bleeding volume in the laparoscopic group was less than that in the open group, and the rate of using drainage tube in the laparoscopic group was lower than that in the open group, and the length of postoperative hospital stay in the laparoscopic group was shorter than that in the open group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.01). However, there were no significant differences in the operation time, the postoperative pain, the first flatus time, the total incidence rate of postoperative complication, the chronic pain rate and the recurrence rate between the two groups (P＞0.05). Conclusion The laparoscopic abdominal incisional hernia repair has the same effect as the open operation, but it has the advantages of minimal invasion and shorter postoperative hospital stay.

Key words： Laparoscope； Incisional hernia； Hernia repair

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	DONG Ling-yi
	HUANG Kun-zhai
	JIANG Han
	ZHANG Si-yu
	ZHANG Fu-xing

Cite this article:

DONG Ling-yi,HUANG Kun-zhai,JIANG Han, et al. Efficacy comparison of laparoscopic and open abdominal incisional hernia repair[J]. 中国当代医药, 2019, 26(9): 47-50.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2019/V26/I9/47

[1]	解轶声，李健文.腹腔镜手术治疗腹壁切口疝现状和趋势[J].中国实用外科杂志，2008，28（12）：1072-1074.
[2]	中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组，中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会.腹壁切口疝诊疗指南（2014年版）[J].中国实用外科杂志，2014，34（6）：487-489.
[3]	中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组，中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会.腹壁切口疝诊断和治疗指南（2018年版）[J].中华外科杂志，2018，56（7）：499-502.
[4]	李骥宇，崔明，朱俊，等.腹壁切口疝的治疗进展[J].西南国防医药，2018，28（8）：797-798.
[5]	曹延宝，韩晓鹏，李三党，等.腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗肥胖患者巨大切口疝21 例的经验总结[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志（电子版），2015，9（4）：302-305.
[6]	李赞林，李义亮，克里木，等.腹壁切口疝的外科治疗体会[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志（电子版），2017，11（2）：101-104.
[7]	唐建雄.浅谈我国腹壁切口疝的治疗进展及未来发展方向[J].中华胃肠外科杂志，2018：21（7）：729-733.
[8]	康德新，刘威，张磊，等.腹腔镜切口疝修补术与开放式切口疝修补术在治疗腹壁切口疝的术式选择与疗效对比分析[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志（电子版），2016，10（6）：455-457.
[9]	王嘉，安伟德，李玉文，等.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗老年腹壁切口疝的临床研究[J].中华实验外科杂志，2015，32（2）：400-402.
[10]	宋健.腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术的临床疗效[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志（电子版），2018，12（2）：124-126.
[11]	Rogmark P，Petersson U，Bringman S，et al.Short-term outcomes for open and laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair： a randomized multicenter controlled trial：the Pro LOVE （prospective randomized trial on open versus laparoscopic operation of ventral eventrations）trial[J].Ann Surg，2013，258（1）：37-45.
[12]	王平.腹腔镜腹部疝修补术后血清肿分型的解读[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志（电子版），2013，4（7）：107-108.
[13]	谢佳明，吴浩荣，谷春伟，等.腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术41 例疗效分析[J].中国实用外科杂志，2012，32（6）：476-478.
[14]	Hasan H，Eker Bibi ME，Hansson MB，et al.Laparoscopic vs. open incisional hernia repair a randomized clinical trial[J].JAMA Surg，2013，148（3）：259-263.
[15]	杨福全.腹壁切口疝的治疗进展和面临的挑战[J].中华普外科手术学杂志（电子版），2014，8（3）：199-202.