全瓷修复体与复合树脂修复在上颌前牙牙体缺损中的应用效果对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (30 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the effect of all-ceramic restoration and composite resin in the restoration of maxillary anterior teeth defects.Methods 104 patients with maxillary anterior teeth defect treated in our hospital from November 2014 to July 2018 were selected and divided into resin group(n=52)and all-ceramic group(n=52)according to different restoration methods.The resin group was filled with composite resin,and the all-ceramic group was restored with all-ceramic crown.The repairing effect,complications and satisfaction of the two groups were evaluated and compared.Results The total effective rate of all-ceramic group was 96.15%higher than that of resin group (82.69%),the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05);the total complication rate of all-ceramic group was lower than that of resin group,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05);the scores of retention function,aesthetics and masticatory function satisfaction of all-ceramic group were significantly higher than that of tree group.Lipid group,the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).Dental preparation and treatment cost score was significantly lower than resin group,the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).Conclusion Compared with composite resin,all-ceramic restoration of maxillary anterior teeth can obtain better restoration effect,better masticatory function and aesthetic effect,and is conducive to the maintenance of periodontal health.The disadvantage of all-ceramic restoration is that a large number of tooth tissues need to be abraded,but the overall application value is higher,which can be based on the clinical defect.Location and area to choose the appropriate way of repair.

Key words： Maxillary anterior teeth defect All-ceramic restoration Composite resin repair Comparison of advantages and disadvantages

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	HUANG Fen

Cite this article:

HUANG Fen. Comparison of the effect of all-ceramic restoration and composite resin in the restoration of maxillary anterior teeth[J]. 中国当代医药, 2019, 26(5): 159-161.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2019/V26/I5/159

[1]	夏雨凝，马楚凡，陈吉华.临床应用瓷贴面美学修复前牙的治疗进展[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志，2018，28（1）：46-51，59.
[2]	武庆华，张晓东，朱坤.二氧化锆全瓷冠在前牙修复中的临床应用研究[J].中华全科医学，2014，12（6）：866-868.
[3]	范立红，闫瑾，范淑霞，等.上前牙邻面龋树脂充填后全瓷贴面修复临床观察[J].中国美容医学，2017，26（10）：93-95.
[4]	何桂霞.光固化复合树脂在前牙美容中的应用分析[J].中国医疗美容，2016，6（12）：68-70.
[5]	黄琛琛，潘丽娜，张伟，等.CAD/CAM全瓷高嵌体修复根管治疗后牙体缺损的临床评价[J].口腔医学研究，2016，32（10）：1056-1059.
[6]	肖云鹤，宋红权，张瑞，等.瓷贴面与纳米树脂修复上前牙切角缺损的对比研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志，2014，30（11）：668-670.
[7]	付宏宇，冯广智.上颌前磨牙修复：3种方式和4种材料的有限元分析比较[J].中国组织工程研究，2018，22（6）：858-864.
[8]	何珍，熊建群.全瓷体与复合树脂体修复上颌前牙牙体缺损的效果比较[J].西南国防医药，2016，26（2）：179-181.
[9]	吴满花.全瓷体与复合树脂体修复上颌前牙牙体缺损临床对比研究[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报，2016，37（31）：3938-3939.
[10]	冯晓莲.全瓷体与复合树脂体在上颌前牙牙体缺损中的修复效果对比[J].临床医学研究与实践，2017，2（15）：98-99.
[11]	杨楠，强雯.CAD/CAM氧化锆全瓷冠修复前牙牙体缺损的临床疗效[J].临床医学研究与实践，2017，2（18）：112-113.
[12]	季从容，刘红红，钱昌富，等.三种方法修复后牙牙体缺损的疗效比较[J].安徽医科大学学报，2017，52（5）：774-776.
[13]	肖丹，姚远，黄丰，等.3种桩核系统全瓷冠边缘和内部适合性比较的实验研究[J].口腔医学研究，2017，33（4）：432-435.
[14]	詹景翔，唐乐.玻璃纤维桩联合全瓷冠修复前牙牙体缺损的效果及对牙周组织的影响[J].中国医疗美容，2016，6（9）：55-57.
[15]	宋卫红.全瓷修复体和复合树脂修复上颌前牙牙体缺损的优劣比较[J].中国医药科学，2017，7（19）：237-239，249.