|
|
Anesthesia effect of 0.3%Ropivacaine for continuous epidural block in percutaneous nephrolithotomy |
LIU Da-qing1 ZHANG Jian-bo2 ZENG Wei-xiang2 CHENG Cai-ni3 |
1.Department of Anesthesiology,Heyuan Chang′an Hospital,Guangdong Province,Heyuan 517000,China;
2.Department of Urology,Heyuan Chang′an Hospital,Guangdong Province,Heyuan 517000,China;
3.Operation Room,Heyuan Chang′an Hospital,Guangdong Province,Heyuan 517000,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the anesthetic effect of 0.3%Ropivacaine for continuous epidural block in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Methods All of 161 patients with percutaneous nephrolithotomy treated in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2018 were selected and divided into the control group (n=80)and the observation group (n=81)according to the random number table method.The control group received 0.1%Lidocaine+0.5%Ropivacaine for continuous epidural anesthesia,and the observation group received 0.3%Ropivacaine for continuous epidural anesthesia.Hemodynamic indexes,analgesic effect and muscle strength at different time points were compared in patients between the two groups during perioperative period.Results The heart rate and mean arterial pressure at T1,T2and T3 were higher than those at T0in patients of the two groups,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Compared with at T0,there was no significant difference in oxygen saturation at T1,T2and T3in the two groups (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in heart rate,mean arterial pressure and oxygen saturation at T1,T2and T3 between the two groups (P>0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS scores at T0,T1,T2and T3in patients between the two groups(P>0.05).The muscle strength of the observation group was better than that of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions in patients between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion Continuous epidural anesthesia with 0.3%Ropivacaine has a good anesthetic effect in the percutaneous nephrolithotomy.It has little effect on hemodynamics,the analgesic effect is accurate,the effect of muscle relaxation is not obvious,and it is safe and reliable.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
罗建仕.经皮肾镜碎石术治疗肾结石的研究进展[J].医学综述,2013,19(24):4538-4541.
|
[2] |
梁柯,柯尊金,金刚.无管化经皮肾镜术临床应用进展[J].浙江医学,2018,40(4):414-416.
|
|
()()
|
[3] |
王少刚,余虓.经皮肾镜碎石取石术的现状与进展[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2016,10(3):1-4.
|
[4] |
张剑明.经皮肾镜取石术麻醉研究[J].医学信息,2016,29(23):232.
|
[5] |
于淑军.尿石症的诊断与治疗[A]//中华中医药学会第二十六次肾病分会学术交流会议论文集[C].2013.
|
[6] |
Owens WD,Felts JA,Spitznagel EL.ASA Physical Status Classifications[J].Anesthesiology,1978,49(4):239-243.
|
[7] |
乔亮,刘志权,向俊,等.三种不同体位在经皮肾镜碎石术中的应用对比[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2013,18(3):275-277.
|
[8] |
刘宗来,袁强,张志,等.复杂性肾结石的临床治疗进展[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2018,23(3):228-231
|
[9] |
魏世平,李辉明,陶维雄,等.仰卧和俯卧位经皮肾镜碎石术在患者血气分析的对比研究[J].国际泌尿系统杂志,2015,35(3):360-362.
|
[10] |
梁宁.老年患者经皮肾镜取石术期间血流动力学变化的研究[J].广西医科大学学报,2010,27(2):276-277.
|
[11] |
吕志瑞,姜丽华,魏晓永.低浓度罗哌卡因硬膜外阻滞下经皮肾镜碎石术麻醉效果观察[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2016,30(11):1136-1138.
|
[12] |
蔡锦全,陈书尚,朱凌峰,等.罗哌卡因局部浸润缓解经皮肾镜取石术后疼痛的前瞻性研究[J].东南国防医药,2015,23(4):365-367.
|
[13] |
梁荣丰.经皮肾穿刺通道周围注射罗哌卡因缓解小儿术后切口疼痛效果分析[J].贵州医药,2016,40(5):497-499.
|
[14] |
许勇,李平.低浓度罗哌卡因硬膜外阻滞下经皮肾镜碎石术麻醉的临床效果观察[J].当代医学,2017,23(14):12-14.
|
[15] |
欧阳天纬,温舒婷,陈潜沛,等.不同浓度罗哌卡因在经皮肾镜碎石术麻醉中的应用[J].临床合理用药杂志,2017,10(10):73-75.
|
|
|
|