依托咪酯与异丙酚全身麻醉诱导在异位妊娠行腹腔镜手术中的麻醉效果对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (35 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the anesthetic effect of Etomidate and Propofol for general anesthesia in laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy.Methods A total of 90 patients with ectopic pregnancy who underwent laparoscopic surgery from October 1,2017 to June 30,2018 in our hospital were selected.According to the admission time,they were divided into the control group and observation group,and there were 45 cases in each group.Patients in the control group were provided with general anesthesia with Propofol,and in the observation group,Etomidate for general anesthesia induction was used.Change of heart rate and blood pressure in before anesthesia(T0),after induction(T1),1 minute after intubation (T2),and 5 minutes after intubation (T3)in ectopic pregnancy patients undergone laparoscopic surgery were compared.The eyes open time,extubation time and orientation recovery time between the two groups were compared.Results The heart rate and systolic blood pressure at T1in patients of the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group,and the diastolic blood pressure was lower than that in the control group,and the eyes opening time,extubation time and orientation recovery time in patients of the observation group were shorter than those in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).Conclusion Compared with Propofol,Etomidate is more effective in laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy,and with sooner recovery in patients.

Key words： Etomidate Propofol General anesthesia induction Ectopic pregnancy Laparoscopic surgery

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Kuang-dong
	WANG Xing-gao
	ZHUO Rui

Cite this article:

CHEN Kuang-dong,WANG Xing-gao,ZHUO Rui. Anesthesia effect comparison of Etomidate and Propofol for general anesthesia induction in laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy[J]. 中国当代医药, 2019, 26(2): 162-164.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2019/V26/I2/162

[1]	谢萍.围术期综合护理措施在宫外孕患者腹腔镜手术中的应用[J].实用临床医药杂志，2017，21（14）：119-122.
[2]	巩永恒，董晓西.依托咪酯与异丙酚全麻诱导对宫外孕腹腔镜手术循环系统和麻醉深度的影响比较[J].中国生化药物杂志，2016，41（9）：85-88.
[3]	隋雪冬.依托咪酯全凭静脉麻醉在宫外孕腹腔镜手术中的临床应用观察[J].亚太传统医药，2013，9（3）：188-189.
[4]	庞晓燕，王宇鑫.探讨依托咪酯与异丙酚在无痛人流术中的应用效果[J].养生保健指南，2017，15（41）：191.
[5]	林辉，陶勇，叶勇.依托咪酯与丙泊酚对异位妊娠失血性休克患者全身麻醉诱导时循环系统以及麻醉深度影响的比较[J].医学综述，2016，23（12）：2457-2459.
[6]	张玉勤，荀世宁，王浩强，等.依托咪酯与异丙酚对老年患者腹腔镜手术血流动力学及术中知晓的影响[J].中国现代普通外科进展，2015，18（8）：649-651.
[7]	韩东英.依托咪酯与异丙酚在无痛人工流产术中应用效果观察[J].临床合理用药杂志，2014，7（28）：28-29.
[8]	王传海.依托咪酯与异丙酚全麻诱导在宫外孕行腹腔镜手术中的麻醉效果对比[J].中国医药指南，2018，16（7）：94.
[9]	普天伟.依托咪酯与丙泊酚全麻诱导对宫外孕腹腔镜手术循环系统和麻醉深度的影响分析[J].健康大视野，2018，26（9）：88.
[10]	邹旭锦.氯胺酮复合异丙酚用于宫外孕手术麻醉分析[J].医药前沿，2015，5（15）：188.
[11]	王丹莹，刘海元.持续性异位妊娠的临床诊治进展[J].生殖医学杂志，2018，27（8）：809-813.
[12]	洪碧娟，李春蕾.异位妊娠腹腔镜应用腰硬联合麻醉的围手术期护理体会[J].中国计划生育学杂志，2015，24（3）：195-198.
[13]	黄佳洋，刘会长，严国胜，等.依托咪酯联合咪唑安定麻醉诱导用于异位妊娠腹腔镜手术的临床观察[J].临床外科杂志，2014，42（3）：204-206.
[14]	宋莹.依托咪酯与丙泊酚对异位妊娠失血性休克患者全身麻醉诱导时循环系统的影响[J].河南外科学杂志，2017，24（1）：59-60.
[15]	刘竹美.丙泊酚联合氯胺酮麻醉在异位妊娠腹腔镜手术中的应用观察[J].大家健康（上旬版），2017，33（1）：28-29.