持续营养支持与顿服营养支持在危重症患者中的效果对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (31 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the effects of continuous nutritional support and nutritional support taken at a draught in critically ill patients.Methods Seventy critically ill patients admitted to our hospital from February 2017 to February 2018 were selected as subjects.They were divided into continuous group and draught group according to the randomization method,with 35 cases in each group.In the continuous group,continuous enteral nutrient solution for nutritional support was used,and in the draught group,enteral nutrition solution taken at a draught was adopted.The therapeutic effect of the two groups were compared.Results The pre-albumin (PA),hemoglobin (Hb)and albumin(ALB)in the continuous group were all higher than those in the draught group,with statistical significance (P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in the percentage of IgA,IgG,IgM or lymphocytes between the two groups(P＞0.05).The duration of mechanical ventilation and the intensive care unit(ICU)stay in the continuous group were both shorter than those in the draught group,with significant differences (P＜0.05).Conclusion For critically ill patients,continuous nutritional support is beneficial for patients′application status improvement,pstoperative hospital stay shortening,effective promotion for the recovery of the body,and non-increase of adverse reactions,which has a high application value.

Key words： Critically ill patients Nutritional support Enteral nutrition Immunity Adverse reactions

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIANG Rong-di

Cite this article:

LIANG Rong-di. Effect comparison of the continuous nutritional support and nutritional support taken at a draught in critically ill patients[J]. 中国当代医药, 2019, 26(2): 37-39.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2019/V26/I2/37

[1]	朱革珍.持续肠内营养法在ICU危重症患者中的应用[J].实用临床医药杂志，2017，21（14）：171-172.
[2]	宋京翔，张再重，王烈.胃肠外科危重症患者的营养支持治疗[J].中华胃肠外科杂志，2016，19（3）：265-268.
[3]	李素芬，蓝英飞，王利平，等.危重症患者营养支持效果及临床结局与血清前白蛋白动态变化的临床研究[J].华夏医学，2015，28（4）：46-48.
[4]	夏友媛.ICU危重患者通过营养风险筛查后给予营养支持的临床效果观察[J].中国处方药，2016，14（10）：115-116.
[5]	吴力，冯杨荣，葛丹霞，等.能量代谢监测下营养治疗对老年危重症患者营养指标及预后的影响[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志，2017，24（6）：645-649.
[6]	王奉涛，宋砚坤，王倩，等.重症监护病房危重患者肠内营养并发症的危险因素分析[J].中华临床营养杂志，2017，25（3）：159-166.
[7]	王新颖.2016年成人危重症病人营养支持治疗实施与评价指南解读[J].肠外与肠内营养，2016，23（5）：263-269.
[8]	王海燕，李增宁，陈立荣，等.肠外营养联合肠内营养对危重胰腺炎患者免疫水平与感染的研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志，2016，26（1）：112-114.
[9]	顾胤杰.早期肠内营养联合微生态制剂对危重病患者胃肠功能恢复的影响[J].江苏医药，2016，42（17）：1899-1900.
[10]	朱全伟，张泓.早期肠内营养对危重症患者免疫状态的影响[J].中国急救医学，2016，36（8）：736-739.
[11]	程晓霞.两种肠内营养液输注方式用于ICU患者肠内营养支持的效果观察[J].中外医学研究，2017，15（10）：148-149.
[12]	杜红妍，王丽，刘小晶，等.早期肠内营养支持对危重症脑卒中患者营养状况和并发症的影响[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志，2016，19（4）：75-76.
[13]	王迎莉，王志方，王俊伟.能全力联合瑞素在危重症患者肠内营养支持中的应用评价[J].实用药物与临床，2017，20（1）：59-61.
[14]	罗秀状，陆青梅，李强，等.序贯性肠内营养在危重型手足口病患儿中的应用效果[J].广西医学，2017，39（5）：658-660.
[15]	魏雨佳，胡环宇，骆彬，等.强化EPA、DHA肠内营养对危重症患者营养状况的影响[J].营养学报，2017，39（5）：474-477.