硬通道微创穿刺治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的临床效果

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (16)
Related Citation (10)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (33 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To investigate the elinieal effeet of hard ehannel minimally invasive puneture in the treatment of ehronie subdural hematoma.Methods A total of 80 eases of ehronie subdural hematoma patients treated in our hospital from June to Deeember 2017 were seleeted as study objeets.All the patients were divided into the observation group and the eontrol group aeeording to the random number table method，with 40 eases in eaeh group.The observation group was treated with hard ehannel minimally invasive puneture，and the eontrol group was treated with drilled drainage.The operation time，postoperative drainage time，hospitalization time，eomplieations，reeurrenee，and treatment effeet were eompared between the two groups.Results The operation time，postoperative drainage time and hospitalization time in the observation group were shorter than those in the eontrol group，the eomplieation rate and reeurrenee rate in the observation group were lower than those in the eontrol group，and the differenees were statistieally signifieant（P＜0.05）.The eure rate of the observation group was slightly higher than that of the eontrol group，but the differenee was not statistieally signifieant（P＞0.05），and there was no signifieant differenee in the total effeetive rate of treatment between the two groups（P＞0.05）.Conclusion The effeet of hard ehannel minimally invasive puneture in the treatment of ehronie subdural hematoma is equal to that of traditional drilled drainage，but hard ehannel minimally invasive puneture ean signifieantly shorten the time of operation，postoperative drainage time and hospitalization time，and reduee the postoperative eomplieations and reeurrenee rate.

Key words： Hard ehannel minimally invasive puneture Drilled drainage Chronie subdural hematoma

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHU Song-guo
	LUO Xing-wu
	LIANG Li-zhen
	WANG Zhi-yong

Cite this article:

ZHU Song-guo,LUO Xing-wu,LIANG Li-zhen, et al. Clinical effect of hard channel minimally invasive puncture in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma[J]. 中国当代医药, 2019, 26(1): 82-84.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2019/V26/I1/82

［1］	黄冠又，张欣，明悦，等.影响慢性硬膜下血肿钻孔引流术后复发的因素分析［J］.国际神经病学神经外科学杂志，2016，43（2）：124-127.
［2］	殷义明，罗成.慢性硬膜下血肿术后复发的危险因素分析［J］.第二军医大学学报，2013，34（6）：687-689.
［3］	牙昌权.慢性硬膜下血肿颅骨钻孔血肿引流术后并发症防治探讨［J］.河北医学，2014，20（1）：77-79.
［4］	吴烁龙.YL-1型碎吸针治疗老年人慢性硬膜下血肿的疗效观察［J］.中国实用医药，2014，9（10）：46-47.
［5］	任东坡.慢性硬膜下血肿液中 VEGF、D-二聚体的测定及意义［J］.临床神经外科杂志，2011，8（4）：195-196.
［6］	华杰，傅小君，许信龙，等.VEGF、纤维蛋白原及 D-二聚体在慢性硬膜下血肿中的作用及临床意义［J］.浙江创伤外科，2012，17（4）：433-435.
［7］	刘恒军.硬通道微创穿刺术在脑出血患者中的应用价值［J］.中国药物经济学，2017，12（3）：147-149.
［8］	彭中，代凌，熊文中.硬通道微创穿刺清除术治疗高血压脑出血的临床观察［J］.中国医药导刊，2012，14（2）：735-736.
［9］	陈新，张传玲，王伟功.锥颅引流术与钻孔冲洗引流术治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的疗效对比分析［J］.中国临床神经外科杂志，2016，21（1）：53-55.
［10］	黄冠又，张欣，明悦，等.影响慢性硬膜下血肿钻孔引流术后复发的因素分析［J］.国际神经病学神经外科学杂志，2016，43（2）：124-127.
［11］	寇欣.改良与传统钻孔引流术治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的疗效比较［J］.神经损伤与功能重建，2016，11（5）：465-466.
［12］	王莹莹，张泰铭，赵宪林.微创穿刺术与钻孔引流术治疗慢性硬膜下血肿疗效Meta分析［J］.山西医药杂志，2016，45（9）：1056-1060.
［13］	罗铸.硬通道微创穿刺引流术对高血压脑出血患者治疗效果颅内感染率及穿刺出血率的影响［J］.河北医学，2017，23（2）：312-314.
［14］	陈冬云，李宝东.硬通道微创穿刺术治疗急性稳定型硬膜外血肿［J］.实用医药杂志，2016，33（8）：684-686.
［15］	王广山.硬通道微创穿刺引流术治疗高血压脑出血对血肿清除率及神经功能改善的影响［J］.中国实用医药，2017，12（24）：48-49.
［16］	李奎智，雷国亮，张成贵.微创穿刺引流联合开颅减压治疗高血压脑出血突发脑疝的疗效分析及其对脑部血流和预后的影响［J］.中国医药导报，2018，15（14）：50-53.