盐酸米诺环素与甲硝唑棒治疗牙周炎的效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (14)
Related Citation (8)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (34 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of Minocycline Hydrochloride and Metronidazole Sticks in the treatment of periodontitis.Methods Twenty-two patients with chronic periodontitis admitted to our hospital from August 2016 to August 2017 were selected and divided into the observation group and the control group according to the random number table method,11 cases in each group.The observation group was treated with Minocycline Hydrochloride Ointment,and the control group was treated with Metronidazole Sticks.The periodontal clinical conditions,submicron microbiology,and the incidence rate of adverse drug reactions were observed before and after treatment in the two groups.Results there was no significant difference in the clinical and microbiological conditions between the two groups before treatment(P＞0.05),and the values of PLI,PD,GI,BOP,the number of bacilli and spirals after treatment at 7,14 d in the two groups were lower than those before treatment,and the number of staphylococci after treatment in the two groups after treatment at 7,14 d was higher than those before treatment(P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in clinical situation,microbiology and the incidence rate of adverse reactions between the two groups after treatment(P＞0.05).Conclusion Both Minocycline Hydrochloride and Metronidazole Sticks are effective drugs for periodontitis.They have safe and reliable characteristics,and the two drugs have similar efficacy.

Key words： Minocycline hydrochloride ointment Metronidazole stick Periodontitis Subgingival microbial

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	HE Ping

Cite this article:

HE Ping. Effect comparison of Minocycline Hydrochloride and Metronidazole Sticks in the treatment of periodontitis[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(29): 100-102.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I29/100

[1]	郝宇恒.派力奥治疗牙周炎的效果观察[J].中国卫生标准管理，2015，6（3）：251-252.
[2]	段少宇，杨炼，蔺世晨，等.盐酸米诺环素软膏与甲硝唑棒治疗慢性牙周脓肿治疗体会[J].中国医药导刊，2013，15（3）：499-500.
[4]	托尼提，章锦才.临床牙周病学牙周非手术治疗专辑[M].沈阳：辽宁科学技术出版社，2013：264-265
[6]	廖延雄.《伯杰氏鉴定细菌学手册》与《伯杰氏分类细菌学手册》[J].微生物学通报，1992，19（4）：59.
[7]	刘晓涛.牙周炎应用派丽奥与牙康治疗的效果对比[J].医学理论与实践，2017，30（20）：3053-3054.
[8]	慕红文，王文兴，陈永强.派丽奥与牙康局部治疗牙周炎的疗效分析[J].海峡药学，2016，28（3）：184-185.
[3]	Saglam M，Kantarci A，Dundar N，et al.Clinical and biochemical effects of diode laser as an adjunct to nonsurgical treatment of chronic periodontitis：a randomized，controlled clinical trial[J].Lasers Med Sci，2014，29（1）：37-46.
[5]	Matsumoto C，Ashida N，Yokoyama S，et al.The protective effects of β-cryptoxanthin on inflammatory bone resorption in a mouse experimental model of periodontitis[J].Biosci Biotechnol Biochem，2013，77（4）：860-862.
[9]	褚芹芹.慢性牙周炎基础治疗结合盐酸米诺环素软膏的疗效观察[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志，2016，3（16）：35-36.
[10]	王治国.盐酸米诺环素软膏治疗慢性牙周炎的临床观察[J].东方食疗与保健，2016，3（2）：9-10.
[11]	吕汝云.派丽奥与牙康治疗牙周炎的疗效分析[J].中外医疗，2017，36（5）：133-134.
[12]	王珺，欧龙，罗芸，等.云南白药与丁香油牙周塞治剂辅助治疗牙周炎的临床效果比较[J].现代生物医学进展，2017，17（1）：141-144.
[13]	张晓竹.牙周组织再生术联合口腔正畸治疗牙周炎的效果探讨[J].航空航天医学杂志，2017，28（2）：186-187.
[14]	蒋慈英.盐酸米诺环素联合甲硝唑治疗老年牙周炎的护理效果观察[J].海峡药学，2017，29（5）：190-192.