超声引导下腹腔脓肿穿刺和手术切开引流在腹腔脓肿患者中的应用效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (36 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the effect of ultrasound-guided abdominal abscess puncture and surgical incision for drainage in patients with abdominal abscess.Methods A total of 70 patients with abdominal abscess from October 2010 to January 2018 in Dapeng Xinqu Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital were selected.They were equally divided into surgical group and puncture group by a random number table methed.In the surgical group,surgical incision for drainage was used,while in the puncture group,ultrasound-guided abdominal abscess puncture was adopted.The clinical efficacy,perioperative indicators,and complications were compared between the two groups.Results After corresponding treatments in the two groups,the cure and improvement rate was 97.14%,which was higher than that in the surgical group accounting for 68.57%with a significant difference between the two groups(χ2=10.057,P<0.01）.In the puncture group,hospital stay was shorter than that of the surgical group,and the pain level was milder than that of the surgical group(P<0.05）.The total incidence of postoperative complications in the puncture group was 5.71%(2/35),lower than that in the surgical group accounting for 28.57%(10/35)with statistical significance(P<0.05）.Conclusion Ultrasoundguided abdominal abscess puncture can significantly improve efficacy,shorten hospital stay,relieve pain,and reduce the risk of complications,and has a higher clinical application value compared with surgical incision for drainage.

Key words： Ultrasound Percutaneous puncture Surgical incision for drainage Abdominal abscess

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHOU Chao-yang
	HU Xue-fei

Cite this article:

ZHOU Chao-yang,HU Xue-fei. Ultrasound guided abdominal abscess puncture and surgical incision for drainage in the application of patients with abdominal abscess[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(28): 42-44.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I28/42

[1]	费洪江，苏子剑，潘群雄，等.经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流术加择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性重症胆囊炎386例分析[J].肝胆胰外科杂志，2014，26（6）：486-488.
[2]	靳忠民，王萍，唐智勇，等.超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流术治疗腹腔脓肿[J].中国医学创新，2013，10（9）：113-115.
[3]	吕新华.胆道超声造影在经皮经肝胆道穿刺引流术后引流不畅患者中的应用价值[J].中国超声医学杂志，2015，31（9）：801-803.
[4]	李飞栋，覃巧云.超声引导下经皮肝胆管穿刺引流术治疗恶性梗阻性黄疸的应用价值[J].山西医药杂志，2016，45（11）：1256-1258.
[5]	刘颜良，张智勇，蔡逊，等.超声引导下经皮经肝胆道穿刺引流术治疗胆肠吻合术后急性重症胆管炎的临床价值[J].临床外科杂志，2015，23（7）：520-522.
[6]	张涛，潘文，金小桦，等.超声引导下穿刺引流治疗腹腔脓肿 28 例临床应用[J].交通医学，2015，29（2）：150-151.
[7]	詹泽锋，洪建文，谢伟超，等.超声引导下经皮穿刺置管引流术在腹腔脓肿治疗中的应用[J].临床医学工程，2017，24（6）：749-750.
[8]	贺轶，吴鹏西，陈俊，等.超声引导下经皮肝胆道穿刺引流术治疗梗阻性黄疸的应用价值[J].临床超声医学杂志，2016，18（4）：262-264.
[9]	张琳达，吴海兰.腹腔镜手术与后穹隆切开引流术治疗盆腔脓肿的效果比较[J].中国当代医药，2013，20（35）：30-31.
[10]	薛前海，郭婧熙.超声引导下腹腔脓肿穿刺治疗疗效观察[J].中国医学装备，2016，13（2）：70-72.
[11]	吕明闯.胸腔镜手术与传统开放手术治疗后食管癌患者的疼痛程度、免疫功能及并发症比较[J].安徽医学，2016，38（10）：1310-1313.
[12]	吴海燕，黄鑫，陈辽，等.超声造影在腹腔脓肿穿刺引流中的应用价值[J].武汉大学学报（医学版），2017，38（3）：483-486.
[13]	郑元超，俞继卫.CT引导下经皮穿刺抽吸引流治疗腹腔脓肿的临床研究[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志，2016，22（5）：403-406.
[14]	卢婷婷，李智贤，徐邦浩.彩色超声引导腹腔穿刺器穿刺置管引流在腹腔脓肿中的临床应用[J].广西医科大学学报，2017，34（4）：585-587.
[15]	巴根.84例腹部手术后腹腔脓肿处理的临床观察[J].大家健康（学术版），2015，（9）：122-123.