|
|
|
| Effect of nursing intervention on the quality of midwifery and postpartum hemorrhage |
| ZHANG Xiao-na CHEN Li-jie WU Jie-ying |
| Family Planning Service Center,Maternity and Child Health Care of Rongcheng District in Jieyang City,Guangdong Province,jieyang 522000,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigation effect of different nursing methods on midwifery quality and postpartum hemorrhage.Methods 80 cases of puerpera treated in Maternal and Child Health Family Planning Service Center of Rucheng District from May 2015 to May 2017 were selected,and they were divided into control group and observation group by computer grouping mode,40 cases in each group.The observation group was given intervention nursing,the control group was given routine care.The two groups of pregnant women were compared with the labor conditions,hemorrhage,cesarean section rate,and satisfaction with medical staff.Results The first stage of labor in the observation group was(402.65±8.95)min,the second stage of labor was(25.76±2.11)min,the third stage of production was(5.86±1.05)min,and the total stage of labor was(456.85±6.98)min,were shorter than that in the control group,the first stage of labor was(416.89±15.68)min,the second stage of production was(53.98±5.44)min,the third stage of production was(7.95±1.62)min,and the total stage of labor was(675.41±9.76)min(P＜0.05）;2 hours postpartum hemorrhage in the observation group was(186.42±15.75)ml,and postpartum 24 hours bleeding was (256.85±26.95)min,and the rate of major bleeding was 5.00%,which were lesser than that of the control group,the postpartum hemorrhage at 2 hours was(254.17±26.97)ml,and the postpartum hemorrhage at 24 hours was(394.19±42.81)min;the rate of major bleeding was 32.50%(P＜0.05）;the service satisfaction score of the observation group was([96.85±1.33]points),the service quality score was[97.38±1.43]points,and the service satisfaction score of the mothers in the control group was([86.17±2.11]points),and the service quality score was([85.23±1.63]points),compliance was （P＜0.05）;social function score in observation group was([95.86±2.33]points),material life([96.83±1.74]points),physical function score was([96.85±1.77]points),and psychological function score was([97.11±1.58]points)were higher than those of the control group([86.58±2.44]points)and material life([87.95±1.75]points),physical function([88.41±1.53]points),and psychological function([85.69±1.75]points),the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05）.Conclusion The nursing intervention for the parturient woman can shorten the birth process,reduce the bleeding,reduce the cesarean section rate and improve the quality of life,so as to improve the satisfaction degree of the medical staff.It is worth promoting in the clinic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
马丽，尹莉，候燕，等.探讨产房舒适护理对助产质量和产房内感染率的改善作用[J].家庭医药，2017，86（2）：185.
|
| [2] |
顾红.产房舒适护理对助产质量和产房内感染率的影响[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志，2017，2（8）：88，91.
|
| [3] |
李彦华.优质护理干预对助产质量和产后出血的效果评价[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志，2017，4（1）：116，118.
|
| [4] |
刘彩鲜.产房舒适护理对助产质量和产房内感染率的影响[J].包头医学，2016，40（2）：117-118，119.
|
| [5] |
高书华.有针对性护理在对自然分娩产妇进行护理中的应用效果探讨[J].当代医药论丛，2017，15（16）：268-269.
|
| [6] |
申艳丽.产房舒适护理对助产质量与产房内感染率的影响[J].世界临床医学，2016，10（12）：130，132.
|
| [7] |
曲艳.产房舒适护理干预对助产质量和产房感染发生率的影响分析[J].中国卫生标准管理，2017，8（17）：158-160.
|
| [8] |
王秀丽，于俊芹.基于文献查证护理方法在肩难产助产中的应用[J].循证护理，2017，3（1）：75-76.
|
| [9] |
谢淑玲，张吉红，罗运红.护理干预对助产质量和产后出血的影响分析[J].中国实用医药，2017，12（28）：189-190.
|
| [10] |
王洪芬.综合护理干预对助产质量及产后出血的影响[J].中国医药指南，2013，16（10）：439-440.
|
| [11] |
亢丽丽，吕行，艾玉艳.舒适护理对助产质量及产房内感染率的影响[J].保健医学研究与实践，2017，14（6）：94-95.
|
| [12] |
张艳秋.综合护理干预对助产质量和产后出血的临床效果评价[J].实用妇科内分泌杂志（电子版），2017，4（2）：83-84.
|
| [13] |
李彦华.优质护理干预对助产质量和产后出血的效果评价[J].实用妇科内分泌杂志（电子版），2017，4（1）：116.
|
| [14] |
项燕.护理干预对助产质量和产后出血的影响分析[J].当代医学，2013，22（10）：134.
|
| [15] |
孙亚云.综合护理对助产质量和产后出血的效果分析[J].实用妇科内分泌杂志（电子版），2017，4（1）：119.
|
|
|
|
