负压封闭引流技术治疗骨科创伤患者的效果

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (6)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (55 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To explore the effect of negative pressure closed drainage technique(VSD)on orthopedic trauma patients.Methods 60 cases of orthopaedic trauma patients admitted in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2017 were selected according to the randomized double blind method,they were divided into the treatment group(32 cases)and control group (28 cases),treatment group was given treatment of VSD,the control group was given conventional treatment therapy.The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared.Results The total effective rate of the treatment group(96.87%)was significantly higher than that of the control group(71.43%),and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05）.Before the treatment,VAS score of two groups was no significant difference (P＞0.05）,after treatment,VAS score two groups of was significantly lower than before treatment,and the treatment group was significantly lower than control group (P＜0.05）;Dressing changing in times treatment group was less than the control group,implementingⅡperiod during the surgery operation time and hospital stay in the treatment group were shorter than the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05）;the time of wound healing,wound healing time and total healing time of wound healing in the treatment group were significantly shorter than that in the control group (P＜0.05）.Conclusion The implementation of the VSD technique is a more significant effect of conventional treatment,patients with less postoperative pain,less dressing,Ⅱperiod shorter operation time and hospital stay,wound healing faster,worthy of clinical popularization and application.

Key words： VSD surgery Orthopedics trauma Wound healing

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YUAN Guo-hui

Cite this article:

YUAN Guo-hui. The effect of negative pressure closed drainage technique in treating patients with orthopaedic trauma[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(25): 106-108.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I25/106

[1]	段国勐.骨科创伤及感染创面应用VSD治疗的临床效果分析[J].中外医学研究，2017，15（18）：137-138.
[2]	何延辉，肖年来，和晓艳，等.采用VSD技术治疗骨科创伤感染患者的临床疗效分析[J].现代诊断与治疗，2015，26（12）：2739-2740.
[3]	齐黔宁.VSD在骨科创伤后感染治疗中的效果观察[J].中国现代药物应用，2017，11（4）：60-61.
[4]	韦世钦.VSD吸引术治疗四肢组织缺损创面的临床效果分析[J].现代诊断与治疗，2012，23（8）：1110-1111.
[5]	李祺.VSD治疗骨科创伤及感染创面的效果分析[J].当代医学，2017，23（24）：93-95.
[6]	温昕芳.VSD引流在骨科创伤感染中的临床应用与分析[J].甘肃医药，2016，35（9）：718-719.
[7]	Charakida M，Qureshi S，Simpson JM.3D echocardiography for planning and guidance of interventional closure of VSD[J].JACC Cardiovasc Imaging，2013，6（1）：120-123.
[8]	Li PX，Fan J.Regional ecological vulnerability assessment based on VSD model：a case study of Xijiang river economic belt in Guangxi[J].J Nat Res，2014，5（2）：163-170.
[9]	Zhang B，Liang J，Zheng X，et al.Transcatheter closure of postoperative residual ventricular septal defects using Amplatzer-type perimembranous VSDoccluders[J].J Invasive Cardiol，2013，25（8）：402.
[10]	吕志东.负压封闭引流术（VSD）在骨外科针对创伤软组织缺损治疗中的研究[J].中国继续医学教育，2015，7（2）：43-44.
[11]	刘海波，范显超，王仁和.负压封闭引流术（VSD）对骨外科创伤软组织缺损患者的应用价值探讨[J].中国卫生标准管理，2016，7（5）：60-61.
[12]	黄超宇，李裕汉.负压封闭引流技术治疗骨科创伤及感染创面的临床观察[J].基层医学论坛，2015，24（20）：2774-2775.
[13]	范卫星，韩飞，陈亮，等.负压封闭引流技术治疗骨科创伤感染患者的临床疗效[J].中华医院感染学杂志，2017，27（23）：5403-5406.
[14]	周振辉.分析负压封闭引流技术在骨科创伤术后感染治疗中的应用价值[J].世界最新医学信息文摘，2015，15（29）：82-83.
[15]	殷波.负压封闭引流技术在87例骨科创伤患者中的应用[J].中国实用医药，2015，10（19）：62-63.