镇痛分娩与传统分娩的临床效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (35 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the clinical effect of analgesia delivery and conventional delivery.Methods 100 cases pregnant women were selected from the gynecology and obstetrics of our hospital from March 2016 to September 2017,and were randomly divided into two groups according to the medical record number,55 cases in the control group were treated with the natural delivery.And the epidural anesthesia was applied to the 45 cases in the observation group on the basis of the control group.After production,the labor duration,degree of pain and neonatal Apgar score were compared between two groups.Results The first stage of labor of parturient in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05）.However,the comparison of the second stage of labor between two groups had no significant difference (P＞0.05）.The degree of pain in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05）.However,the comparison of the neonatal Apgar score between the two groups had no significant difference(P＞0.05）.Conclusion Analgesia delivery could significantly shorten the first production time,reduce the degree of pain,and have no negative effect on neonatal health.

Key words： Analgesic delivery Conventional delivery Pain

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	WU Yan-miao
	YANG Yun

Cite this article:

WU Yan-miao,YANG Yun. Comparison of clinical effects of analgesia delivery and conventional delivery[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(23): 127-129.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I23/127

[1]	李屹，危早梅，黄祝疆，等.耳穴贴压法用于潜伏期分娩镇痛的临床效果评价[J].现代医院，2017，17（9）:1381-1383.
[2]	胡正芳，于斌，王云珍，等.舒芬太尼联合罗哌卡因行椎管内术后硬膜外镇痛的疗效观察[J].中国疼痛医学杂志，2017，23（10）：754-758.
[3]	El-Shaarawy AM，Asfour MS，Rashwan DA，et al.Comparison of three different concentrations of Levobupivacaine for epidural labor analgesia：clinical effect and pharmacokinetic profile[J].Anesth Essays Res，2018，12（1）：60-66
[4]	Ali HM，Wahdan A.Using dexamethasone as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in epidural anesthesia to change the pain intensity and duration in painless labor[J].Saudi J Anaesth，2018，12（2）：209-214.
[5]	何淑莹，贾小文.背腧穴皮下洼射利多卡因进行分娩镇痛的临床观察[J].西部中医药，2016，29（8）:128-130.
[6]	李红梅，王宝红，孙金梅.心理护理干预联合椎管内麻醉镇痛分娩对产后出血和泌乳的影响[J].中国药物与临床，2016，16（3）：450-451.
[7]	钟婕娟.气囊仿生助产在初产妇自然分娩中的价值探讨[J].中国当代医药，2018，25（2）：185-187.
[9]	王桂春，孙暘.硬膜外麻醉无痛分娩中对母婴影响的临床研究[J].中国妇幼健康研究，2017，28（2）：166.
[11]	黄映红.无痛分娩在产科分娩中的应用效果[J].中国当代医药，2017，24（5）：70-72.
[14]	房建，赵继蓉.小剂量罗哌卡因联合舒芬太尼腰硬联合麻醉在无痛分娩中的应用[J].中华全科医学，2018，16（2）：264-267.
[15]	姜义铁，俞书盼，聂颖，等.芬太尼联合罗哌卡因硬膜外麻醉用于无痛分娩的临床疗效及对产程的影响[J].中国计划生育学杂志，2018，26（2）：119-121.
[8]	Akbarzadeh M，Nematollahi A，Farahmand M，et al.The effect of two-staged warm compress on the pain duration of first and second labor stages and Apgar score in prim gravida women：a randomized clinical trial[J].J Caring Sci，2018，7（1）：21-26.
[10]	Shen X，Li Y，Xu S，et al.Epidural analgesia during the second stage of labor：a randomized controlled trial[J].Obstet Gynecol，2017，130（5）：1097-1103.
[12]	Ferrer LE，Romero DJ，Vásquez OI，et al.Effect of programmed intermittent epidural boluses and continuous epidural infusion on labor analgesia and obstetric outcomes：a randomized controlled trial[J].Arch Gynecol Obstet.2017，296（5）：915-922.
[13]	Staikou C，Kalampokas T，Kalampokas E，et al.Epidural fentanyl does not affect cervical dilation and progress of first stage of vaginal delivery： a randomized，double-blind study[J].Curr Med Res Opin，2017，33（8）：1491-1496.