经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术和经尿道前列腺等离子电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (7)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (34 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical effect of transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate(PKEP)and transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate(PKRP)in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.Methods A total of 100 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia treated in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2017 were selected and divided into the control group and the study group according to the random number tables method,50 cases in each group.The control group was treated with PKRP,and the study group was treated with PKEP.The clinical related indexes,complications,residual urine volume,maximum urine flow rate,international prostatic hyperplasia symptom score (IPSS)and quality of life index (QOL)were compared between the two groups.Results The amount of bleeding in the study group was less than that in the control group,the weight of the prostatic resection in the study group was greater than that in the control group,the time of bladder irrigation,the indwelling time of urethral catheter and the time of hospitalization after the operation of the study group were shorter than those of the control group (P＜0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups(P＞0.05).There was no significant difference in urine flow rate,residual urine,PISS and QOL before intervention between the two groups(P＞0.05).The urine flow rate,residual urine,PISS and QOL decreased significantly in the two groups after intervention,but there was no significant difference between the study group and the group (P＞0.05).Conclusion PKEP and PKRP are effective in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia,but PKEP treatment has less trauma,more radical resection and faster postoperative recovery.

Key words： Transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate Benign prostatic hyperplasia Maximum urinary flow rate

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LAI Zai-chi
	LI Si-hua
	FAN Han-gong
	LIN Yue-yue

Cite this article:

LAI Zai-chi,LI Si-hua,FAN Han-gong, et al. Effect comparison of transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate and transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(21): 73-75.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I21/73

[1]	王传华.老年良性前列腺增生采取经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术治疗的临床效果[J].深圳中西医结合杂志，2017，27（6）：73-74.
[2]	吴志强，韩金利，蓝弼文，等.经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术治疗老年良性前列腺增生患者的临床体会[J].岭南现代临床外科，2016，16（4）：465-467.
[3]	李胜，曾宪涛，郭毅，等.经尿道等离子腔内剜除术与经尿道等离子双极电切术比较治疗良性前列腺增生的Meta分析[J].中国老年学杂志，2017，37（1）：1172-1183.
[4]	那彦群.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南[M].北京：人民卫生出版社，2006.
[5]	付卫国，吴海丽.经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生 40 例疗效观察[J].当代医学，2016，22（21）：82-83.
[6]	徐浩，杨华，孙根喜，等.经尿道等离子前列腺汽化剜除术与前列腺电切术对良性前列腺增生患者性功能影响的对比研究[J].中国性科学，2016，25（3）：20-23.
[7]	江敦勤.经尿道双极等离子前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生症效果观察[J].山东医药，2016，56（46）：97-99.
[8]	王鑫朋，刘春雨，张东正，等.铥激光前列腺剜除术与经尿道前列腺剜除术治疗大体积良性前列腺增生的临床疗效比较[J].天津医科大学学报，2017，23（1）：47-50.
[9]	蔡振，周华设.经尿道双极电切术与等离子剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的效果比较[J].医学综述，2016，22（13）：2693-2696.
[10]	罗成军，李静文.经尿道等离子前列腺剜除术治疗前列腺增生症的疗效分析[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志，2016，15（8）：617-620.
[11]	范志强，刘中华，朱晓博，等.经尿道前列腺双极等离子剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生症的临床疗效分析[J].微创泌尿外科杂志，2016，5（3）：158-162.
[12]	周杰彬.经尿道双极等离子前列腺电切术和前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效及并发症观察[J].中外医学研究，2016，14（15）：35-36.
[13]	田新涛.分析经尿道双极等离子前列腺电切术和前列腺剜除术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效[J].国际医药卫生导报，2016，22（2）：165-167.
[14]	龚墅，罗晋杨.经尿道双极等离子前列腺电切术（PKRP）和前列腺剜除术（PKEP）治疗良性前列腺增生（BPH）的疗效及并发症分析[J].吉林医学，2017，38（7）：1276-1278.
[15]	祝秀文，童炎岳，万里军.经尿道前列腺剜除术对前列腺增生患者疗效及对尿动力的影响[J].浙江创伤外科，2017，22（5）：966-968.