新、旧产程标准在产妇中的应用效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (31 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the application effect of new and old labor standards in puerperae.Methods A total of 100 maternal women who gave birth using the new labor standard from January 2016 to June 2017 in our hospital were selected as observation group.During the same period,100 puerperae used old labor standard were employed as control group.All patients were primiparae.The time of labor stages including first stage of labor,second stage,and total labor stage were compared in the two groups.The delivery modes such as cesarean section,vaginal assistant labor,natural childbirth were compared in the two groups.The patient′s delivery outcomes including postpartum hemorrhage,the incidence of neonatal asphyxia were observed in the two groups.Results In the observation group,the first stage of labor,the second stage of labor and the total stage of labor were all shorter than those in the control group.The oxytocin use rate was significantly lower than that in the control group,which displayed statistical differences(P＜0.05).In the observation group,the incidence of spontaneous labor was higher and vaginal assistant labor was lower compared with the control group(P＜0.05).There was no statistical difference between the two groups in cesarean section(P＞0.05).The proportions of postpartum hemorrhage,neonatal asphyxia and umbilical arterial blood pH＜7.00 in the observation group were all significantly lower than those in the control group(P＜0.05).Conclusion The new labor standard in puerperae can significantly decrease the vaginal assistant labor rate and cesarean section transferring rate and reduce neonatal asphyxia,which can be extensively used in clinic.

Key words： New standard of labor Vaginal assisted labor Cesarean transfer Neonatal asphyxia Postpartum hemorrhage

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	SHANG Li-li
	ZHU Fang
	BU Xiu-hua

Cite this article:

SHANG Li-li,ZHU Fang,BU Xiu-hua. Application effect comparison of new and old labor standards in puerperae[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(11): 84-86.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I11/84

[1]	郑媛媛，邹丽颖，范玲，新产程标准实施后产程中剖宫产指征的变化及母儿预后分析[J].中华妇产科杂志，2016，51（4）：245-249
[2]	徐燕媚，黄利川，陈逢春，新产程标准第二产程时限延长的安全性探究[J].热带医学杂志，2017，17（8）：1043-1046
[3]	谢幸，苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京：人民卫生出版社，2013：177-209.
[4]	中华医学会妇产科学分会产科学组.新产程标准及处理的专家共识（2014）[J].中华妇产科杂志，2014，49（7）：486.
[5]	王燕，那娜，新产程标准实施500例临床分析[J].中国实用医药，2017，12（17）：102-103
[6]	刘清，幺宏彦，新产程标准及处理的临床应用探讨[J].中国妇幼保健，2016，31（23）：4999-5001
[7]	杨恒生，梁丹丹，章芸.新第二产程时限对母婴预后及剖宫产率影响研究[J].中国医药科学，2017，7（8）:100-102.
[8]	李淑琴.新产程标准实施对剖宫产率的影响研究[J].医药前沿，2016，6（20）：158-159.
[9]	闫思思，肖玲.新产程标准及其助产模式对产钳助产、中转剖宫产和新生儿窒息发生率的影响[J].中华围产医学杂志，2016，19（4）：315-317
[10]	胡艳英，新产程标准的临床应用及对产妇和新生儿预后的影响[J].中国实用医药，2017，12（17）：101-102.
[11]	任瑞雪，贾晨阳.新产程标准实行对阴道分娩中转剖宫产率的影响[J].中国临床医生杂志，2016，44（5）：91-92.
[12]	张翰儒，刘博，王德贵.新、旧产程标准改善自然分娩的临床对照研究[J].卫生职业教育，2016，34（17）：155-157.
[13]	王春芳，王慧敏，欧阳林.新产程标准与助产措施对产钳助产、中转剖宫产和新生儿窒息发生率的影响分析[J].医学临床研究，2017，34（6）：1135-1137.
[14]	石琪，漆洪波.推广新产程标准促进阴道分娩[J].实用妇产科杂志，2015，31（4）：253-255.
[15]	黄秋明，陈晖，梁美娟，等.新产程标准的应用对妊娠结局的影响[J].海南医学，2017，28（6）：989-990.