|
|
A comparative study of laparoscopic radical colectomy and open radical colorectal resection for senile patients with colorectal cancer |
CHEN Dan ZHANG Wei-bin WU Min-hua |
Department of General Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University,Guangdong Province,Guangzhou 510000,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic radical colectomy and open radical colorectal resection for senile patients with colorectal cancer.Methods A total of 112 senile patients with colorectal cancer enrolled in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University from June 2010 to June 2013 were selected as research objects.The patients were divided into laparoscopic group (n=57)and laparotomy group (n=55),according to different operation methods.The following indexes of the two groups were compared:operation time,number of resected lymph nodes,intraoperative bleeding loss,postoperative ambulation time,gastrointestinal function recovery time,complications(incision fat liquefaction and infection,anastomotic bleeding,anastomotic fistula,ileus,deep vein thrombosis,cerebral infarction and pulmonary infection incidence rate and total hospitalization time.The survival rate and recurrence rate of the two groups were compared at 1,2 and 3 years after operations.Results There was no significant difference in the operation time and the number of resected lymph nodes in the two groups(P>0.05).The amount of bleeding in the laparoscopic group was significantly reduced(P<0.05).The postoperative ambulation time,gastrointestinal function recovery time and total hospitalization time in the laparoscopic group was significantly shortened(P<0.05).Postoperative complications such as incision fat liquefaction and infection,anastomotic bleeding,anastomotic fistula,adhesive ileus,deep vein thrombosis,cerebral infarction and pulmonary infection rate of the laparoscopic group were lower than those in the laparotomy group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The survival rates at 1,2,and 3 years after the operation were 100.00%,92.89%and 91.22%in the laparoscopic group and 98.18%,92.72%and 90.90%in the laparotomy group.The recurrence rates at 1,2,and 3 years after the operation were 3.50%,5.26%and 8.77%in the laparoscopic group,and 3.63%,5.45%and 10.90%in the laparotomy group.There was no significant difference in the survival rate and recurrence rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic radical surgery for elderly patients with colorectal cancer is safe and feasible,and its clinical effect is superior to traditional open radical surgery,and has a good application prospect.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
杨华,肖刚,汪欣.老年结直肠癌根治性切除患者的预后分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,2015,34(4): 400-404.
|
[2] |
刘彦龙,赵发林,王锡山.2414例直肠癌患者的临床病理特征及预后分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2010,13(12):913-916.
|
[3] |
杨钰,姜春玉.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术在结直肠癌根治术中临床疗效的对比研究[J].中国全科医学,2013,16(17):1990-1993.
|
[4] |
徐洪彪.腹腔镜与开腹直肠全系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的临床对比探讨[J].中国医药指南,2016,5(14):69-70.
|
[5] |
Abraham N,Albayati S.Enhanced recovery after surgery programs hasten recovery after colorectal resections[J].World J Gastrointest Surg,2011,3(1):1-6.
|
[6] |
李国新,赵丽瑛.腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术解剖概要[J].中国实用外科杂志,2011,31 (9):844-846.
|
[7] |
Hirasaki Y,Fukunaga M,Sugano M,et al.Short-and longterm resultsof laparoscopic surgery for transverse colon cancer[J].Surg Today,2014,44(7):1266-1272.
|
[8] |
Fujii S,Ishibe A,Ota M,et al.Short-term results of a randomized study between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients[J].Surg Endosc,2014,28(2):466-476.
|
[9] |
姜可伟,高志冬.腹腔镜结直肠手术并发症的预防与处理[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2015(6):533-535.
|
[10] |
钟武,张磊昌,钟世彪,等.腹腔镜辅助直肠癌手术中转开腹的危险因素分析及预测模型建立[J].中国全科医学,2014,15(30): 3545-3549
|
[11] |
刘航,张跃天,刘震,等.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术与开放性手术的疗效及安全性分析[J].实用癌症杂志,2017,32(3):418-420
|
[12] |
徐建庆,徐勇,雷磊.腹腔镜与常规开腹手术治疗老年人乙状结肠癌及直肠癌的临床对比研究[J].陕西医学杂志2013,42(8): 1003-1005
|
[13] |
张仁汉,佘军军.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术与开腹手术短期疗效的比较[J].西安交通大学学报(医学版),2014,35(6): 862-864
|
[14] |
陈丹,张伟斌,吴敏华.腹腔镜和开腹大肠癌根治术临床疗效对比[J]现代诊断与治疗,2014,25(5):3554-3555
|
[15] |
Kim HJ,Lee IK,Lee YS,et al.A comparative study on the short-termclinicopathologicoutcomesoflaparoscopicsurgery versus conventional open surgery for transverse colon cancer[J].Surg Endoc,2009,23(8):1812-1817.
|
|
|
|