发育筛查量表的评价者间信度和共聚效度分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (20)
Related Citation (14)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (39 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To analyze the reliability and validity of development screening test(DST)in the evaluation of infant development.Methods Infants and children in 0-6 years old who were treated in Department of Pediatric Rehabilitation of Guizhou Provincial People′s Hospital during the period of April 1,2016 to March 31,2017 were selected as the subject of this research.The DSTs of the subject were evaluated by two highly trained professional evaluators to analyze the reliability of their interviewer.The subjects also participated in the Peabody sports development test,which was used as a gold standard assessment tool to analyze the copolymerization validity of DST.Results A total of 174 children(male 99 cases,56.9%)were included in this study,with an average age of(10.23±9.43)months.The developmental quotient(DQ)score in DST was(67.83±19.63)points,and the mental index(MI)score was(61.94±15.9)points.The DQ and MI scores of girls were all higher than those of boys,with statistically significant difference(P＜0.05).The intra-class correlation coefficient(ICC)value of each dimension of DST was between 0.76-0.89,and the results showed that there was a good correlation between the interviewers′score.The correlation coefficients between gross motor operator(GMQ),fine motion operator(FMQ),total motion operator(TMQ)in Peabody and DQ,MI scores of DST were 0.59 vs.0.57,0.62 vs.0.68,0.63 vs.0.64,respectively.The correlation coefficient of Peabody in gross motor between reflection,posture,mobile score and DQ,MI were 0.42 vs.0.36,0.54 vs.0.50,0.56 vs.0.58;the correlation coefficient of grasping and visual motor integration in fine motor and DQ and MI scores were 0.65 vs.0.70,0.62 vs.0.68;each dimension of DST was best correlated with fine motor in the Peabody and slightly lower correlated with gross motor dimensions.Conclusion DST has good inter-interviewer reliability and copolymerization validity,indicating that the test is a reliable and effective tool for motor development screening in Chinese children.

Key words： DST development screening Peabody motor development test Screening Reliability and validity

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIU Ye
	LI Jia-qiong
	XIONG Cai-yun
	WANG Yao-zhou
	LUO Lin-yin
	CUI Yu-xia
	ZHOU Hao

Cite this article:

LIU Ye,LI Jia-qiong,XIONG Cai-yun, et al. Evaluation of the interviewer reliability and copolymerization validity of the development screening test[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(11): 4-7.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I11/4

[1]	Draper CE，Tomaz SA，Stone M，et al.Developing intervention strategies to optimise body composition in early childhood in South Africa[J].Biomed Res Int，2017[Published online].
[2]	Uauy R，Corvalan C，Casanello P，et al.Intervention strategies for preventing low birthweight in developing countries：importance of considering multiple interactive factors[J].Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser，2013，74（3）：31-52.
[3]	Crnic KA，Neece CL，Mcintyre LL，et al.Intellectual disability and developmental risk：promoting intervention to improve child and family well-being[J].Child Dev，2017，88（2）：436-445.
[4]	Gebhard AR，Ottenbacher KJ，Lane SJ.Interrater reliability of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales：fine motor scale[J].Am J Occup Ther，1994，48（11）：976-981.
[5]	Lenaert B，Boddez Y，Griffith JW，et al.Aversive learning and generalization predict subclinical levels of anxiety：a six-month longitudinal study[J].J Anxiety Disord，2014，28（8）：747-753.
[6]	Accardo PJ.50 years ago in the Journal of Pediatrics：the pedictability of Gesell developmental scales in Mongolism[J].J Pediatr，2013，162（1）：55.
[7]	Dai XY，Ryan JJ，Paolo AM，et al.Factor analysis of the mainland Chinese version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale （WAIS-RC） in a brain-damaged sample[J].Int J Neurosci，1990，55（2-4）：107-111.
[8]	Brito CM，Vieira GO，Costa MC，et al.Neuropsychomotor development：the Denver scale for screening cognitive and neuromotor delays in preschoolers[J].Cad Saude Publica，2011，27（7）：1403-1414.
[9]	郑慕时，冯玲英，刘湘云，等.0～6岁儿童智能发育筛查测验全国城市常模的制定[J].中华儿科杂志，1997，35（3）：6-9.
[10]	王文丽，范果叶，张瑞芳.呼和浩特市婴幼儿发育商筛查分析[J].中国妇幼保健，2010，25（11）：1510-1511.
[11]	姜晏，邹文霓，查树伟，等.0～3岁婴幼儿发育状况的调查分析[J].中国医药指南，2015，13（21）：3-6.
[12]	王素娟，李惠，杨红，等.Peabody运动发育量表[J].中国康复理论与实践，2006，12（2）：181-182.
[13]	杨芳，龚建华，万瑞平，等.Peabody粗大运动发育量表与粗大运动功能测试量表在中枢性协调障碍康复评估中的应用[J].中国妇幼保健，2014，29（19）：3097-3099.
[14]	张兰，唐久来.Peabody和Gesell量表对引导式教育早期干预HIE患儿的疗效评估及两个量表间的相关性分析[J].中国儿童保健杂志，2015，23（7）：730-732.
[15]	张兰.Peabody和Gesell量表对引导式教育早期干预HIE患儿的疗效评估及两个量表间的相关性分析[D].合肥：安徽医科大学，2015.
[16]	梁莉，刘文龙.Peabody运动发育量表评价贫血对婴儿运动发育的影响[J].中国妇幼保健，2016，31（5）：968-970.
[17]	Athanasiadou E，Kyrkou C，Fotiou M，et al.Development and validation of a mediterranean oriented culture-specific semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire[J].Nutrients，2016，8（9）：522.
[18]	李莉，陈善佳，方云华，等.中文版SF-36用于评价亚急性脑卒中患者生存质量的信度和效度[J].中国康复医学杂志，2017，32（5）：509-515.
[19]	吴瑞林，Ke-Haiyuan.基于顺序数据的测验信度和效度分析方法[J].中国卫生统计，2013，30（5）：773-776.
[20]	钟韬，魏庆曜.职业能力测评中评分者信度FINN系数与ICC的计算与MATLAB实现[J].西南民族大学学报（自然科学版），2015，41（4）：489-493.