椎弓根螺钉脊柱内固定与通用型脊柱内固定治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的效果对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (18)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (30 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To analyze the effect of different internal fixation methods in the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal fractures,and to provide a reference for the selection of specific surgical methods in clinical practice.Methods The clinical data of 61 patients with thoracolumbar spinal fractures treated in our hospital from January 2014 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed,and all patients were treated with single segment fixation,bone graft and fusion.According to the different methods of internal fixation,61 patients were divided into the control group(30 cases)and the observation group (31 cases).The control group was treated with pedicle screw fixation,and the observation group was treated with general spinal internal fixation.The curative effect and the incidence rate of complication between the two groups were compared,and the amount of bleeding and the operation time of the patients were compared.Results There was no significant difference in the height of the Cobb angle,the posterior edge and the front edge of the vertebral body between the two groups of patients(P＞0.05).The amount of bleeding in the observation group was less than that of the control group,and the operation time in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group,with significant difference (P＜0.05).The incidence rate of complications in the observation group was 0.00%,which was lower than that in the control group(13.33%),with significant difference(P＜0.05).Conclusion Compared with pedicle screw fixation,the use of general spinal fixation for pedicle screw fixation can significantly reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss and shorten the operation time,and less complications and adverse reactions,high safety,therefore,in clinical practice,the general spinal internal fixation is the first choice for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine fracture with single segmental fixation and bone graft fusion.

Key words： Injured vertebral nailing Thoracolumbar spinal fracture Internal fixation

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	PENG Chuan-hua
	CHEN Jian

Cite this article:

PENG Chuan-hua,CHEN Jian. Effect comparison of pedicle screw fixation and general spinal internal fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar spine fracture[J]. 中国当代医药, 2018, 25(1): 76-78.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2018/V25/I1/76

[1]	唐飞，张荣，彭兴平，等.伤椎置钉单节段固定与短节段固定治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折分析[J].创伤外科杂志，2015，17（4）：358，368.
[2]	邓晓强，杨勇.伤椎置钉短节段内固定治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的进展[J].骨科，2014，5（1）：59-61.
[3]	劳世高.经伤椎置钉短节段椎弓根钉内固定治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折[J].中国老年保健医学，2014，22（4）：78-79.
[4]	叶茂，邹毅，王奎，等.经椎旁肌间隙入路辅助伤椎置钉内固定治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折28例疗效分析[J].贵州医药，2014，39（8）：733-735.
[5]	陈彦，初同伟，杨波，等.经伤椎置钉短节段固定治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的疗效分析[J].重庆医学，2016，45（13）：1841-1843.
[6]	宋楹卓，张军，惠备战.经椎弓根钉后路固定结合伤椎内植骨置钉治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折[J].当代医学，2015，23（2）：45-46.
[7]	黄锐.伤椎置钉GSS系统与传统手术治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的临床效果比较[J].中国临床新医学，2017，10（5）：470-472.
[8]	刘晓雷，孙景福，吴任涛，等.不同固定方式治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的效果比较[J].中国当代医药，2016，23（10）：81-83.
[9]	张强，张敏，黄志荣，等.经皮椎弓根内固定配合手法闭合复位治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的可行性[J].中国当代医药，2016，23（16）：83-85.
[10]	刘一涛.脊柱胸椎段骨折截瘫合并胸外伤的临床合理治疗分析[J].中国医药科学，2017，7（15）：175-177.
[11]	游军，陈子华，陈文超.经伤椎置钉内固定联合伤椎椎体内植骨治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的临床效果[J].现代诊断与治疗，2017，28（3）：402-403.
[12]	闫东阳.成人胸腰段脊柱骨折应用前路与后路内固定治疗的疗效分析[J].中国实用医药，2017，12（21）：27-29.
[13]	蒋仕林，倪诚.后入路椎弓根钉不同节段固定治疗重度胸腰段脊柱骨折的临床观察[J].医学临床研究，2016，33（12）：2326-2328.
[14]	吕俊生.后路椎弓根内固定联合伤椎植骨在老年胸腰段脊柱骨折患者中的应用价值研究[J].中国卫生标准管理，2016，7（36）：21-23.
[15]	王智博，王军，王智慧.跨伤椎固定与经伤椎固定治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的效果比较[J].河南医学研究，2017，26（9）：1605-1606.
[16]	尹升吉.不同手术入路内固定融合术治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的效果比较[J].中国当代医药，2015，22（22）：70-72.
[17]	史国徽.经伤椎固定治疗胸腰段脊柱骨折的效果和安全性[J].中国医药指南，2015，13（36）：164-165.
[18]	伍骥.重视胸腰段脊柱骨折的诊断和治疗[J].中国骨伤，2015，29（1）：1-3.