|
|
The study of the effect on serum PRL level with rePetitive transcranial magnetic treatment of refractory schizoPhrenia |
LI Yi-fan1 ZHANG Shao-xia2 ZHENG Li-hua2 LIU Hao1 |
1.C1inica1 Laboratory,the Seventh Peop1e's Hospita1 of Dongguan City in Guangdong Province Menta1 Hea1th of City Center,Dongguan 523230,China;
2.Department of Psychiatry,the Seventh Peop1e' s Hospita1 of Dongguan City in Guangdong Province Menta1 Hea1th of City Center,Dongguan 523230,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To study the effect ana1ysis of transcrania1 magnetism therapy (rTMS) in the treatment of intractab1e schizophrenia and its inf1uence on serum PRL 1eve1. Methods 120 patients with schizophrenia in our hospita1 from January 2014 to June 2015 were se1ected as research objects and were even1y divided into two groups in random. In research group,high-frequency rTMS was provided,whi1e in contro1 group,sham rTMS in the corresponding was app1ied.Five times per week for 2 consecutive weeks were needed.Score of positive and negative syndrome sca1e(PANSS) (positive symptom score,negative symptom score,patho1ogica1 score,the tota1 score),CGI-SI score,and serum PRL 1eve1 were tested before and after treatment between two groups.The prognosis after therapy was investigated between the two groups. Results Before treatment,there was no statistica1 difference in PANSS score,CGI-SI score or serum pro1actin 1eve1s between the two groups (P>0.05).After therapy,the PANSS score and CGI-SI score between the two groups had obvious changes,the difference was statistica11y significant (P<0.05),and the change degree of patients in the research group was significant1y higher than that of the contro1 group,the difference was statistica11y significant (P<0.05);Serum PRL 1eve1 in the research group was significant1y decreased,which was disp1ayed a statistica1 difference in comparison with that before treatment (P<0.05).No significant change was presented in the contro1 group without statistica1 difference compared with prior treatment(P>0.05).The serum pro1actin 1eve1 after treatment in the research group was great1y 1ower than that in the contro1 group (P<0.05).The tota1 effective rate in the research group after therapy was 56.7%,and the rate in the contro1 group was 40.0%,which was in a statistica1 difference (P<0.05),the marked1y effective rate in the research group was 35%,significant1y higher than 16.7% in the contro1 group (P<0.05). Conclusion rTMS can obtain some effect on treating intractab1e schizophrenia.It can remarkab1y decrease the 1eve1 of serum pro1actin and has c1inica1 app1ication va1ue,which is worthy of promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
[11] |
蒲绮霞,张春萍,黄雄,等.高频重复经颅磁刺激联合药物治疗精神分裂症阴性症状的临床疗效[J].实用医学杂志,2013,23(13):2133-2135.
|
[12] |
成军,李红,石玉中.氯氮平联合重复经颅磁刺激治疗难治性精神分裂症的临床疗效[J].中国康复医学杂志,2013,28(8):754-757.
|
[13] |
陈小寒,柯晓英,刘秀云,等.重复经颅磁刺激治疗精神分裂症患者护理的特异性研究[J].中国实用护理杂志,2013,29(24):69-71.
|
[1] |
廖力维,王继军.重复经颅磁刺激治疗精神障碍作用机制[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2013,39(9):573-577.
|
[2] |
林琳,陈小寒,吴开文,等.心理护理在首次行经颅磁治疗精神分裂症患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2013,19 (22):127-128.
|
[3] |
甘景梨,段惠峰,杨家明,等.重复经颅磁刺激对精神分裂症患者磁共振波谱和疗效的影响[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2013,39(11):667-671.
|
[4] |
权文香,乔宏,赵志宇,等.低频重复经颅磁刺激治疗精神分裂症患者的顽固性幻听[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2012,26(3):204-208.
|
[5] |
符巍,李大齐,李清均,等.经颅磁刺激治疗对精神分裂症疗效及社会功能的影响研究[J].重庆医学,2014,43(4):399-400.
|
[6] |
郑丽娜,郭茜,李惠,等.不同重复经颅磁刺激模式对精神分裂症认知功能和精神症状的影响[J].北京大学学报(医学版),2012,44(5):732-736.
|
[7] |
任艳萍,周东丰,蔡焯基,等.高频重复经颅磁刺激治疗精神分裂症难治性阴性症状的随机双盲对照试验[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2011,25(2):89-92.
|
[8] |
梁炜,张迎黎,吕路线.重复经颅磁刺激合并药物治疗强迫症的临床观察[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2011,37(7):389,400,417.
|
[9] |
Zei1er FA,Matuszczak M,Teite1baum J,et al.Transcrania1 magnetic stimu1ation for status epi1epticus[J].Epi1epsy Res Treat,2015,2015:678074.
|
[10] |
程敏锋,温盛霖,唐秀梅.首发未用药精神分裂症患者的血清催乳素水平分析[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2013,39(6):344-346.
|
[14] |
李凝,王学义,宋美,等.重复经颅磁刺激联合帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症首次发病患者的起效时间及对执行功能的影响[J].中华精神科杂志,2012,45(3):137-140.
|
[15] |
凌琳,黄国志.不同频率重复经颅磁刺激对脑梗死患者运动功能影响的研究[J].中华神经医学杂志,2012,11 (2):169-172.
|
|
|
|