个性化全瓷基台和钛基台分别联合全瓷冠修复在前牙种植修复中的效果对比

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (32 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract ObjectiveTo compare the effect of personalized all-ceramic abutment combined with all-ceramic crown restoration and Titanium abutment combined with all-ceramic crown restoration in anterior dental implant restoration.Methods70 caseswith anterior dental implant restoration from March 2014 to March 2015 in our hospitalwere selected and divided into the observation group(33 cases,37 implants)and the control group(37 cases,40 implants)according to the different abutment.The observation group was given the combination treatment of personalized all-ceramic abutment and all-ceramic crown restoration,the control group was treated with the combination of personalized Titanium abutments and all-ceramic crown restoration.All the patientswere re-examined after implantation at 1,6,12months,included peri-implant probing,mobility,the contour of the crown (whether it was damaged)and other clinical examinations.The gingival bleeding index(GBI)and plaque index(PI)in the two groups were compared,the aesthetic satisfaction degree was also evaluated according to the statistical of Pink esthetic score(PES)and White esthetic score(WES).ResultsAll the 77 bone horizontal implants showed neither loosening nor damages in the contour of the crown postoperatively.Therewas no significant difference in the GBIand PIbetween the two groups at different time after implantation.There was no significant difference in the satisfaction degree of PES and WES between the two groups after implantation at 1 and 6months.The satisfaction degree of PESand WES in the observation group after implantation at 12 monthswas higher than that in the control group,with significant difference(P＜0.05).ConclusionIn the cosmetic anterior implant repair,the personalized all-ceramic abutment shows great superiority and better overall effect over personalized Titanium abutments,which isworthy of clinical promotion and application.

Key words： All-ceramic abutment Titanium abutment Dental implant restoration All-ceramic crown restoration

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LIHong-bo

Cite this article:

LIHong-bo. Comparison of the effect of personalized all-ceram ic abutment combined with all-ceram ic crown restoration and Titanium abutment combined with all-ceram ic crown restoration in anterior dental im p lant restoration[J]. 中国当代医药, 2016, 23(34): 101-103.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2016/V23/I34/101

[1]	李俊青，王大山，王永亮，等.氧化锆基台的制作及其与钛基台抗折强度的比较[J].现代生物医学进展，2013，13（14）：2640-2643.
[2]	吴小勇，杨娅，顾泽旭，等.2种不同钛基台-氧化锆全瓷修复体用于低位咬合单个磨牙缺失患者种植修复的临床评价[J].实用口腔医学杂志，2013，29（3）：394-397.
[3]	钟倩，周国兴，光寒冰，等.个性化铸瓷复合基台在前牙种植美学修复中的临床应用[J].华西口腔医学杂志，2013，31（4）：429-431，433.
[4]	孙旭东，佟宇，王玮园，等.个性化全瓷基台在前牙区种植美容修复中的应用[J].中国美容医学，2013，22（22）：2230-2232.
[5]	张磊，郭宏亮，牛文芝，等.氧化锆全瓷基台的临床应用体会[J].黑龙江医药，2014，27（6）：1443-1444.
[6]	李伟，张志宏，边华琴，等.即刻与延期前牙种植义齿修复的临床效果及主观满意度调查[J].重庆医学，2015，44（8）：1103-1105.
[7]	刘夏青，李丹，李英，等.瓷基台与钛基台临床修复效果的Meta分析[J].临床口腔医学杂志，2015，31（4）：195-198.
[8]	杨炎忠，田小华，周延民，等.氧化锆角度基台及种植体周骨壁应力分布的有限元分析[J].上海口腔医学，2015，24 （4）：447-450.
[9]	吴春锋，谢乔，王书明，等.氧化锆瓷基台与钛种植体联合应用中不同连接体设计的有限元分析[J].临床口腔医学杂志，2014，30（3）：140-142.
[10]	戴文雍，周国兴，张晓真，等.前牙美学区种植义齿个体化修复及临床评价[J].上海口腔医学，2014，23（4）：446-451.
[11]	Georges B，王冰.口内扫描仪实现前牙种植冠修复的新技术[J].实用口腔医学杂志，2014，30（5）：734-738.
[12]	冼逢珠，陈俊兰，吴纪楠，等.个性化全瓷基台在前牙种植修复中的应用[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志（电子版），2016，10（3）：202-207.
[13]	程玉叶，周文清，陈建珊，等.个性化纯钛基台在后牙种植修复中的临床应用[J].淮海医药，2016，34（2）：134-136.
[14]	冯全胜，王珊珊，杨璐，等.氧化锆基台和常规钛基台在治疗前牙区种植修复中的对比分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报，2016，37（17）：2184-2185.
[15]	朱桂莲，王仁飞，陈鹤良.底座黏结式个性化CAD/CAM氧化锆全瓷基台的临床应用[J].上海口腔医学，2013，22 （6）：676-679.