持续负压球引流治疗切口皮下大量积液的效果观察

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (0)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (37 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract ObjectiveTo discuss the clinical effect of continuous negative pressure drainage in the treatment of large amount of subcutaneous effusion in the incision.MethodsFrom May 2010 to May 2016,36 patients with subcutaneous infection empyema or other reasons causing simple large effusion were divided into negative pressure ball group(n=15) and open dressing group(n=21)according to different incision treatmentmethods in our hospital.Patients in the negative pressure ball group were taken continuous negative pressure drainage treatment and in the open dressing group were used traditionalmethods of open drainage dressing treatment，healing time,dressing change times and scarwidth of two groupswere compared.ResultsTime from the negative pressure ball drainage treatment to extubation in the negative pressure ball group was 7-12 d,the average length of stay was 9 d;2-4 times of dressing change in each case;all wound healing were linear scar.Time of wound healing in the open dressing group ranged from 15 to 25 d,the average length of stay was 15 d;9 to 26 times of dressing change in each case,with an average of 15 times.Dressing change times in the negative pressure ball group was significantly less than that in the open dressing group,healing time and scar width was significantly better than that in the open dressing group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionNegative pressure ball group are effective in shortening time of healing,reducing times of dressing change,easing pain of patients,decreasing workload of doctors,healing with litter scar and beautiful appearance,so it is worthy of clinical application.

Key words： Subcutaneous effusion in the incision Continuous negative pressure drainage Healing time Frequency of dressing change Scarwidth

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHONG Yong-fu
	LI Ying
	XIAOMing-gen
	WANG Xiao-lan

Cite this article:

ZHONG Yong-fu,LI Ying,XIAOMing-gen, et al. Effect observation of continuous negative pressure drainage in the treatment of large amount of subcutaneous effusion in the incision[J]. 中国当代医药, 2016, 23(33): 20-22.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2016/V23/I33/20

[1]	吴风云，张东昌，张松.封闭式负压引流预防腹部手术切口感染[J].武警医学院学报，2009，18（6）：528.
[2]	付小兵，王德文.现代创伤修复学[M].北京：人民军医出版社，1999：17-30.
[3]	林翔海，杜锐峰，陈焰，等.负压封闭引流治疗腹部切口感染的临床疗效观察[J].中国当代医药，2011，18（11）：159-160.
[4]	姜庆彤.小切口负压球引流术治疗高位肛周脓肿的临床疗效分析[J].中国医药指南，2013，11（27）：416-417.
[5]	彭建宇，孙秀玲，韩维红.封闭式创面负压引流技术的研究及应用进展[J].护理研究，2002，16（12）：692-693.
[7]	王飞.简易持续负压吸引在深部创面的应用观察及护理[J].中国美容医学杂志，2011，20（1）：151-152.
[8]	石宝秋，肖泉，曾敬初，等.腰大池持续外引流治疗切口脑脊液漏及皮下积液外渗（附30例报告）[J].广西医学，2006，28（4）：565-566.
[9]	苗小军，赵跃.封闭持续负压引流治疗创伤性皮下积液疗效回顾性分析[J].河南外科学杂志，2012，18（5）：12-13.
[6]	Coerper S，Wangner S，Witte M，et al.Temporary expression pattem inwound secretionsand peripheralwound bioplsies[J]. Zentralbl Chir，1999，124（Suppl 1）：78-80.
[10]	易建中，谢元才，叶林娇，等.自制注射器负压封闭引流器在腹部外科手术Ⅲ类切口防治切口感染的临床疗效[J].赣南医学院学报，2010，30（2）：276.
[11]	黄彩娥，赵秀贞.单向负压球用于甲状腺手术切口引流的效果观察[J].护理研究，2003，17（3）：287.
[12]	吴晓红，尹江柳，蔡文华，等.负压吸引球预防颅骨修补术后皮下积血积液的研究[J].实用预防医学，2010，17（11）：2258-2259.
[13]	冯彩婷，张东辉，熊云田，等.负压球细管引流在治疗恶性胸腔积液中的应用[J].现代肿瘤医学，2010，18（7）：1328-1329.
[14]	李宏，王欣.负压引流与常规引流在巨大坐骨结节囊肿手术中的疗效比较[J].中国现代医生，2016，54（1）：33-35.
[15]	马洪，邵思海，邵泰宗，等.超声定位小切口清创持续负压引流治疗Morel-Lavallée损伤[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志，2016，31（2）：178-179.