|
|
Effects of natural delivery and cesarean section on early uterine recovery in primiparas |
LAN Xiu-qing1 CHEN Jin-xiu2 WEI Xiao-li2 ZHU Xiao-ping2 WENG Yi3
|
1.Department of Gynecology,the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Zengcheng District in Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 511300,China;
2.Department of Obstetrics,the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Zengcheng District in Guangdong Province,Guangzhou 511300,China;
3.Department of Nursing,the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Zengcheng District in Guangdong Province,Guangzhou 511300,China |
|
|
Abstract ObjectiveTo explore the effect of natural delivery and cesarean section on early uterine recovery in primiparas.Methods300 primiparas delivery in our hospital from April 2016 to July 2016 were selected and divided into natural delivery group and cesarean section group according to the delivery mode,with 150 cases in each group.Both groups received obstetric routine care in prenatal and postpartum.The natural delivery group were given natural childbirth,while the cesarean section group were given lower uterine cesarean section.The postpartum uterine descent speed, the postpartum lochia situation and the uterine recovery situation were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe postpartum uterine descent speed in the natural delivery group [(1.83±0.27)cm]was faster than that in the cesarean section group [(1.23±0.33)cm];the postpartum bloody lochia duration and the time of lochia of natural delivery group [(2.59±0.78),(30.28±2.74)d]was shorter than that in the cesarean section group[(3.83±1.02),(40.35±3.42)d];the uterine recovery rate of natural delivery group (96.0%)was higher than that in the cesarean section group (86.0%),the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).ConclusionNatural delivery compared to cesarean section is more conducive to postpartum uterine recovery.Health care workers should strictly control the indications for cesarean section and do a good job of health education and guidance to reduce cesarean section rate.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
阮焱,张为远.剖宫产的现状及剖宫产率高居不下的原因[J].实用妇产科杂志,2015,31(4):241-243.
|
[2] |
刘兴会,代莉.我国自然分娩现状及展望[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2015,31(2):97-100.
|
[3] |
刘羽,鲍书欣.剖宫产新生儿低血糖早期护理干预研究进展[J].中华现代护理杂志,2014,20(33):4281-4283.
|
[4] |
程宽.剖宫产的应用发展现状及对患者的影响[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31(12):2569-2571.
|
[5] |
扈聪,张利群,孙玉秀,等.剖宫产术后并发症83例临床分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2012,27(1):43-45.
|
[6] |
张明,谭诗亮,潘丽娟,等.剖宫产术后慢性疼痛的研究进展[J].解放军护理杂志,2016,33(3):48-51.
|
[7] |
曾晶,谈珍瑜.子宫复旧不全相关影响因素的研究进展[J].医学综述,2015,21(11):2000-2002.
|
[8] |
王绍文.二维超声在产后子宫复旧不良中的应用价值[J].辽宁医学院学报,2015,36(1):61-62.
|
[9] |
王瑞,童玉荣,鲁静.剖宫产的社会因素分析及护理干预效果[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2014,39(8):1120-1122.
|
[10] |
周杰,李维玲,李牧.不同分娩方式对产妇早期盆底功能障碍的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016,20(23):78-81.
|
[11] |
赵晓娟,张雪茹.剖宫产与自然分娩子宫复旧情况的比较[J].泰山医学院学报,2016,37(6):655-656.
|
[12] |
张秀.初产妇剖宫产与自然分娩子宫复旧的对照研究[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(16):44-46.
|
[13] |
李晓勤,张瑛,孙江川,等.剖宫产与自然分娩子宫复旧情况的比较[J].重庆医科大学学报,2009,34(5):640-642.
|
[14] |
薛国勇,张志晓.剖宫产与自然分娩对产妇影响的比较[J].中国妇幼保健,2009,24(26):3659-3660.
|
[15] |
赵慧玲,李玉洁,段予新,等.剖宫产与自然分娩的子宫复旧及恶露情况比较[J].中国乡村医药,2005,12(7):23-24.
|
|
|
|