微螺钉种植体支抗不同植入角度对口腔正畸患者牙槽骨吸收及并发症发生率的影响

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (22)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (505 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of different implantation angles of microscrew implant anchorage on alveolar resorption and the incidence of complications in orthodontic patients.Methods A total of 80 orthodontic patients who needed to be treated with retraction of anterior teeth and admitted to the Department of Stomatology at Pingxiang People's Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were selected as the study objects.They were divided into group A (at 30° to the alveolar surface,26 cases),group B (at 60° to the alveolar surface,29 cases)and group C(at 90°to the alveolar surface,25 cases)according to the implantation angle of microscrew implant anchorage.The stability of microscrew implant,alveolar resorptionand the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results After applying 150 g of load,the microscrew implant loosening ratein of group B was lower than those in group A and group C,and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.017).The absorption values of alveolar height and width in group B were lower than those in group A and group C,and the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of complications among the groups(P＞0.05).Conclusion The stability of microscrew implanted at an angle of 60°to the alveolar surface is the best.This method can better reduce lateral and longitudinal alveolar resorption,without increasing the incidence of complications.Clinicians can consider this angle when implanting microscrew implant.

Key words： Microscrew implant anchorage Implantation angle Orthodontics Alveolar resorption Complication

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

Cite this article:

URL:

https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2024/V31/I11/51

[1]	徐静，胡敏.正畸微种植体定位方法研究进展[J].口腔医学研究，2023，39（2）：101-104.
[2]	陆晨萌，宋吉玉，吴志娜，等.微种植体支抗对下颌第二磨牙严重近中倾斜阻生正畸治疗1 例报告及文献复习[J].吉林大学学报：医学版，2021，47（6）：1550-1556.
[3]	Torres PR，Gil ST，Zubizarreta-Macho A，et al.Influence of the Computer-Aided Static Navigation Technique on the Accuracy of the Orthodontic Micro-Screws Placement：An In Vitro Study[J].J Clin Med，2021，10（18）：4127.
[4]	高琳清，刘璇，王培，等.不同骨龄患者上颌后牙颊侧骨皮质厚度及其与微种植体脱落率的相关性研究[J].现代口腔医学杂志，2019，33（2）：83-86.
[5]	吴也可，赵立星，郜然然.植入角度对微种植体稳定性的影响[J].口腔医学研究，2019，35（2）：172-175.
[6]	施则安，夏恺，罗良语，等.无托槽隐形矫治器联合微种植体内收并压低上前牙的三维有限元分析[J].华西口腔医学杂志，2022，40（5）：589-596.
[7]	芦志方，杨涛，邹晶.微螺钉种植体支抗治疗对口腔正畸患者牙根吸收状况、咀嚼功能和美观程度的影响[J].海南医学，2022，33（5）：598-602.
[8]	刘静，刘宏梅.微螺钉种植体支抗在临床口腔正畸中的应用效果观察[J].河南医学研究，2018，27（7）：1271-1272.
[9]	Synek A，Ortner L，Pahr DH.Accuracy of osseointegrated screwbone construct stiffness and peri-implant loading predicted by homogenized FE models relative to micro-FE models[J].J MechBehav Biomed Mater，2023，140（1）：105740.
[10]	邱添源，李莹，徐静，等.腭中缝融合程度对种植体支抗辅助上颌快速扩弓效果的影响[J].中华口腔医学杂志，2021，56（8）：777-784.
[11]	RiadDeglow E，Toledano Gil S，Zubizarreta-Macho á，et al.Influence of the Computer-Aided Static Navigation Technique and Mixed Reality Technology on the Accuracy of the Orthodontic Micro-Screws Placement.An In Vitro Study[J].J Pers Med，2021，11（10）：964.
[12]	赵弘，刘洪臣，顾晓明.骨皮质厚度及植入角度对支抗种植钉影响的三维有限元分析[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志，2010，11（1）：24-27.
[13]	张扬，张丹，冯翠娟.微小种植体正畸支抗生物力学的三维有限元分析[J].上海口腔医学，2005，14（3）：281-283.
[14]	聂晶，石晓宇.锥形束CT 测量种植体支抗植入位点上颌前牙区牙槽骨厚度的性别差异[J].中国组织工程研究，2021，25（14）：2133-2136.
[15]	姚宇，蔡斌，麦理想，等.青少年上颌后牙区微种植钉的植入角度研究[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志，2013，7（6）：460-465.
[16]	王俊祥，孙江伟，白布加甫·叶力思，等.动态加载下3 种基台材料对上颌角度植入种植修复体周围骨应力的影响[J].中国组织工程研究，2023，27（3）：398-405.
[17]	高文莫，郑嘉宝，刘颜彬，等.上颌窦底剩余骨高度小于4mm的种植外科方案及适应症探讨[J].北京口腔医学，2023，31（1）：23-29.
[18]	桂芳，刘桂红，马赫，等.即刻种植的牙槽骨吸收程度的CBCT 观察及种植体稳定性分析[J].影像科学与光化学，2022，40（2）：362-366.
[19]	黄洁，王海丞，胡佳慧，等.种植体颈部与唇侧骨板间距离对唇侧牙槽骨吸收及牙龈退缩的影响[J].口腔颌面外科杂志，2021，31（2）：75-80.
[20]	Terheyden H，Meijer GJ，Raghoebar GM.Vertical bone augmentation and regular implants versus short implants in the vertically deficient posterior mandible：a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies[J].Int J Oral MaxillofacSurg，2021，50（9）：1249-1258.
[21]	Shin YG，Cho WT，Lim HK，et al.Influence of an Implant Fixture including a Freely Removable Micro-Locking Implant Prosthesis on Peri-Implant Tissues and Implant Prostheses：A Prospective Clinical Study[J].J Clin Med，2021，10（15）：3321.
[22]	Zukauskas S，Puisys A，Andrijauskas P，et al.Influence of Implant Placement Depth and Soft Tissue Thickness onCrestal Bone Stability Around Implants With and Without Platform Switching：A Comparative Clinical Trial[J].Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent，2021，41（3）：347-355.