|
|
|
| Application of oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior approach screw-rod system in lumbar spondylolisthesis |
| WANG Yuehua1 ZHOU Zhichun2 ZHANG Lichun1 SHUANG Ou1 |
1. Department of Orthopedics, Shangrao City People′s Hospital, Jiangxi Province, Shangrao 334000, China;
2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shangrao City People′s Hospital, Jiangxi Province, Shangrao 334000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the application effect of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with posterior approach screw-rod system in lumbar spondylolisthesis. Methods A total of 85 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis in Shangrao City People′s Hospital from June 2019 to June 2021 were selected for retrospective study. According to the surgical methods, the patients were divided into 40 cases in the nail rod group and 45 cases in the combined group. The nail rod group was treated with posterior intervertebral fusion and nail rod system, and the combined group was treated with OLIF combined with approach screw-rod system. The intraoperative blood loss, operation time,postoperative infection rate, symptom relief rate, lumbar fusion rate and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the intraoperative infection rate between the two groups(P＞0.05). The operation time of the combined group was longer than that of the nail rod group, but the intraoperative blood output of the combined group was less than that of the nail rod group, the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05). The remission rate of symptoms in the combined group was higher than that in the nail rod group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The lumbar fusion rate of the combined group was higher than that of the nail rod group, and the length of hospital stay of the combined group was lower than that of the nail rod group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion OLIF combined with posterior approach screw-rod system in the treatment of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis can reduce intraoperative blood loss, shorten the operation time, improve symptoms, and promote bone graft fusion and postoperative recovery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
范明星，房彦名，安岩，等.机器人辅助L4、L5椎弓根螺钉内固定术治疗腰椎滑脱症的学习曲线研究[J].中华骨科杂志，2022，42（6）：341-348.
|
| [2] |
陈博来，李永津，苏国义，等.后外侧入路经皮内窥镜下腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的临床疗效分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志，2021，31（6）：527-533.
|
| [3] |
龙浩，艾龙，卡米力江·乌斯曼，等.体重指数和关节突关节角度与退行性腰椎滑脱症的相关性分析[J].颈腰痛杂志，2020，41（1）：39-42.
|
| [4] |
魏见伟，陈龙伟，姜良海，等.退变性腰椎滑脱发病的相关因素探讨[J].中国矫形外科杂志，2021，29（2）：131-134.
|
| [5] |
万大地，袁野，范鑫超，等.腰椎滑脱症的分类及治疗进展[J].中国医药导刊，2021，23（3）：190-194.
|
| [6] |
金大地.现代脊柱外科手术学[M].北京：人民军医出版社，2001：441-451.
|
| [7] |
刘春.腰椎滑脱症术后伤口感染危险因素分析[J].中国骨伤，2019，32（10）：882-885.
|
| [8] |
Fukui M，Chiba K，Kawakami M，et al.Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.Part 2.Verification of its reliability：the Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association[J].J Orthop Sci，2007，12（6）：526-532.
|
| [9] |
秦世强，孙宇庆，倪文卓，等.OLIF 与TLIF 治疗退变性腰椎滑脱合并腰椎管狭窄症的疗效对比[J].实用骨科杂志，2018，24（7）：628-632.
|
| [10] |
李丹，罗旭，杨俊.椎弓根螺钉固定局部减压与选择性椎间融合修复退变性腰椎侧凸[J].中国组织工程研究，2016，20（39）：5807-5812.
|
| [11] |
胡彪，余铃，廖全明.斜外侧椎间融合术联合小切口Wiltse入路椎弓根螺钉固定治疗腰椎滑脱症早期疗效[J].中国修复重建外科杂志，2020，34（3）：294-299.
|
| [12] |
陈斌彬，毛克亚，韩振川，等.微创经椎间孔入路腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症的中短期随访[J].脊柱外科杂志，2019，17（5）：297-302.
|
| [13] |
柴旭斌，周英杰，郑怀亮，等.斜外侧椎间融合术联合前路钉棒固定治疗腰椎滑脱症的疗效及安全性[J].中国医刊，2019，54（11）：1256-1259.
|
| [14] |
黄开，杨金华，潘文明，等.斜外侧入路与经椎间孔入路腰椎椎体间融合术在退行性腰椎滑脱症的疗效对比[J].颈腰痛杂志，2020，41（2）：237-239.
|
| [15] |
王晓锋.后路钉棒复位联合棘突椎板掀盖回植环360°减压融合治疗中重度峡部裂型腰椎滑脱[J].颈腰痛杂志，2019，40（2）：286-287.
|
| [16] |
葛腾辉，吴静晔，李观清，等.斜外侧椎间融合术联合后路固定治疗退行性腰椎滑脱对手术节段力线的影响[J].中华骨科杂志，2021，41（3）：141-148.
|
| [17] |
李建江，白涛，胡炜，等.OLIF 联合后路经皮固定术治疗腰椎退变性滑脱疗效观察[J].中国现代手术学杂志，2021，25（3）：182-187.
|
|
|
|
