|
|
|
| Effect comparison of internal limiting membrane packing and flip coverage treating refractory macular hole |
| LIU Wei-dong ZHAN Tian-yin BAI He-nan |
| Department of Ophthalmology,Chifeng Second Hospital,Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region,Chifeng 024000,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To analyze the effect of internal limiting membrane packing and flip coverage treating refractory macular holes.Methods A total of 78 patients with refractory macular hole who were treated in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2019 were selected and divided into a control group and an observation group according to the random number table method,39 patients in each group.The control group was treated with inner limiting membrane packing,and the observation group was treated with flip coverage.The closure of the hole,the treatment time of the inner limiting membrane,and the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) level before and after treatment were compared between the two groups.Results The puncture closure rate of the observation group was 92.31%,it was higher than that of the control group which was 74.36%,the internal limiting membrane treatment time was (617.27±60.57)s,it was longer than the control group which was (455.38±43.92)s,the differences were statistically significant(P＜0.05).Before the operation,the BCVA levels of the two groups were compared,and the differences were not statistically significant(P＞0.05);the BCVA levels of the two groups were lower than those before the operation at 1 month and 3 months after the operation,and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05);1 month and 3 months after operation,the BCVA levels of the two groups were not statistically different (P>0.05).Conclusion Flip coverage treatment can increase the hole closure rate of patients with refractory macular hole and effectively improve the patient′s BCVA level,which is worthy of clinical application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [4] |
吴超，游志鹏.扩大内界膜剥离术与标准内界膜剥离术对闭合指数＜0.7 特发性黄斑裂孔的疗效比较[J].中华实验眼科杂志，2018，36（1）：56-60.
|
| [5] |
徐鑫彦，孙先勇，高荣玉，等.特发性黄斑裂孔术后俯卧位与自由体位患者裂孔闭合率的比较[J].中国实用眼科杂志，2017，35（10）：970-973.
|
| [6] |
曾苗，蔡春艳，陈晓，等.扫频光相干断层扫描指导特发性黄斑裂孔手术后低头位的裂孔闭合率观察[J].中华眼底病杂志，2018，34（2）：139-143.
|
| [7] |
殷志博，闵思，魏玉华，等.玻璃体切除联合内界膜剥除术治疗高度近视黄斑劈裂临床研究[J].中国实用眼科杂志，2016，34（10）：1043-1048.
|
| [1] |
黄智华，谭薇，张英，等.内界膜翻转填塞与内界膜剥除治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离的Meta分析[J].国际眼科杂志，2019，19（4）：55-60.
|
| [2] |
刘苏青，李晶，王伟，等.玻璃体切割联合改良内界膜覆盖手术治疗复杂黄斑裂孔的疗效观察[J].国际医药卫生导报，2019，25（1）：111.
|
| [3] |
郝玉华，席瑞洁，韩悠，等.玻璃体切割联合内界膜移植术治疗大直径特发性黄斑裂孔的疗效评估[J].中华实验眼科杂志，2017，35（11）：1014-1018.
|
| [8] |
严晓腾，姚进.不同轴长高度近视眼黄斑白孔性视网膜脱离玻璃体手术后疗效比较[J].临床眼科杂志，2015，23（1）：43-45.
|
| [9] |
闾雯娟，范银波，肖云.视网膜内界膜移植联合自体全血治疗高度近视继发黄斑裂孔[J].中国实用眼科杂志，2017，35（8）：775-778.
|
| [10] |
刘广峰，马志中，马列，等.笛针负压吸引辅助裂孔闭合技术对大特发性黄斑裂孔的疗效[J].中华实验眼科杂志，2019，37（1）：45-48.
|
| [11] |
郭笑霄，王佳琳，王艳玲.玻璃体切除联合内界膜剥除治疗高度近视黄斑劈裂的研究进展[J].中国实用眼科杂志，2017，35（8）：753-755.
|
| [12] |
刘海芸，周亦凡，孙晓东，等.玻璃体切割联合单层内界膜翻转覆盖手术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离合并黄斑裂孔的疗效观察[J].中华眼底病杂志，2019，35（6）：539-543.
|
| [13] |
邢怡桥，周晶，李拓，等.玻璃体切割联合内界膜翻转覆盖术治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离[J].国际眼科杂志，2018，18（10）：1912-1914.
|
| [14] |
张啸，贺涛，程谷萌，等.玻璃体切除联合内界膜翻转覆盖治疗特发性黄斑裂孔的临床疗效观察[J].临床眼科杂志，2018，26（1）：10-13.
|
| [15] |
张艳琼，竺珂.内界膜翻转覆盖术治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离[J].中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志，2019，19（6）：373-374.
|
| [16] |
马宁，贺涛，邢怡桥，等.内界膜瓣翻转覆盖术联合白内障摘除术治疗特发性黄斑裂孔合并白内障的疗效分析[J].中国医师进修杂志，2019，42（11）：966-969.
|
| [17] |
陶继伟，徐一珺，沈丽君，等.内界膜翻转联合自体血覆盖治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔的疗效观察[J].中华眼底病杂志，2019，35（6）：549-553.
|
| [18] |
肖紫云，邢怡桥，贺涛，等.玻璃体切割联合内界膜瓣覆盖术中行球内无菌空气填充治疗特发性黄斑裂孔[J].国际眼科杂志，2018，18（7）：1301-1304.
|
|
|
|
