骨岛技术在后交叉韧带保留型膝关节置换中的应用效果

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To study the application effect of bone island technique in posterior cruciate ligament preserving knee arthroplasty.Methods A total of 120 patients with knee osteoarthritis admitted to the Department of Arthrosis,Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from November 2019 to March 2020 were selected as the research subjects.The patients were divided into stable prosthesis (PS) group,traditional posterior cruciate ligament (CR) prosthesis group and bone island osteotomy CR prosthesis group accordin to the random number table method,with 40 patients in each group.Hospital for special surgery knee (HSS) score,visual analogue scale (VAS) score,femoral condyle retrorolling degree and knee motion were compared among the three groups.Results One month after surgery,HSS score of bone island osteotomy CR prosthesis group was higher than that of CR prosthesis group and PS group,and HSS score of CR prosthesis group was higher than that of PS group,the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).One month after surgery,there was no significant difference in VAS scores among the three groups (P＞0.05).One month after surgery,there were no significant differences in femoral condyle retrorolling distance and knee motion among the three groups (P＞0.05).Conclusion The three methods for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis have the same degree of postoperative pain,knee range of motion and femoral condyle roll back,but knee function of bone island osteotomy CR prosthesis is better,clinical worthy of promotion.

Key words： Bone island technique Knee osteoarthritis Knee replacement Posterior cruciate ligament retention

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	HE Junyuan
	TANG Jianbang
	WU Ziguang

Cite this article:

HE Junyuan,TANG Jianbang,WU Ziguang. Application effect of bone island technique in posterior cruciate ligament preserving knee arthroplasty[J]. 中国当代医药, 2022, 29(17): 89-91转96.

URL:

https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2022/V29/I17/89

[10]	文涛，涂意辉，薛华明，等.单髁置换术与全膝置换术的经济效益分析[J].中华关节外科杂志（电子版），2017，11（2）：29-33.
[1]	罗宇文，刘世桢，周雪明，等.后交叉韧带保留型及替代型假体在全膝关节置换术后早期疗效比较[J].广东医科大学学报，2017，35（4）：381-384.
[2]	王林，宋磊，韩伟峰.全膝关节置换术中后交叉韧带保留与切除与否的对比研究[J].首都医科大学学报，2017，38（6）：915-918.
[3]	刘军，甄平，周胜虎，等.类风湿关节炎行关节置换术围手术期管理的研究进展[J].中国骨伤，2017，30（11）：1067-1073.
[4]	柴伟，任鹏，陈继营，等.旋转平台后交叉韧带保留型与替代型人工膝关节置换术短期疗效比较[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志，2015，8（4）：327-331.
[5]	王君峰.后交叉韧带替代型假体和后交叉韧带保留型假体全膝关节置换术的疗效分析[J].中国民间疗法，2018，26（7）：71-72.
[6]	高晨鑫，孙松涛，解骏，等.后稳定型与后交叉韧带保留型膝关节假体在人工膝关节置换术后的早期临床疗效比较分析[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究，2018，15（2）：68-70.
[7]	雷立松，程艳，何浪.探讨后交叉韧带保留型膝关节假体（CR 型假体）在膝关节置换中的临床应用效果[J].饮食保健，2019，6（27）：67-68.
[8]	卢明峰，李泽晖，朱东平，等.同一患者双膝单间室骨关节炎单髁置换与全膝关节置换的对比[J].中国组织工程研究，2018，22（3）：343-349.
[9]	王家伟，尹宗生，马广文，等.单髁置换术与全膝关节置换术后人工关节遗忘程度的比较[J].实用骨科杂志，2018，24（5）：464-467.
[11]	原福贞，孙泽文，齐岩松，等.膝关节置换假体研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志，2019，27（2）：154-158.
[12]	温新明，穆臣会，郭氧.全膝关节置换与单髁置换术治疗膝关节内侧间室骨性关节炎的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志，2018，33（10）：1073-1075.
[13]	丘立标，彭伟秋，李富明，等.中年膝骨性关节炎全膝关节置换中应用旋转高屈曲型假体的特点[J].中国组织工程研究，2016，5（17）：2467-2473.
[14]	杨金江，鲁英，郭艾，等.后交叉韧带保留型膝关节假体在膝关节置换中的临床应用[J].临床和实验医学杂志，2017，16（5）：489-492.
[15]	Clement ND，MacDonald DJ，Hamilton DF，et al.Posterior condylar offset is an independent predictor of functional outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty[J].Bone Joint Res，2017，6（3）：172-178.