|
|
Influence of nasal irrigation concentration and timing after ultrasonic atomization through nose and mouth on nasal ventilation function and clinical curative effect after operation of chronic sinusitis |
DAI Feng XIE Zuojun YANG Qiming ZHONG Zhuanglong |
Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pingxiang People′s Hospital, Jiangxi Province, Pingxiang 337000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To study the influence of nasal irrigation concentration and timing after ultrasonic atomization through nose and mouth on nasal ventilation function and clinical curative effect after chronic sinusitis operation. Methods A total of 80 patients with chronic sinusitis from Pingxiang People′s Hospital from March, 2020 to November, 2021 were selected as subjects for retrospective analysis. They were divided into four groups, A, B, C and D according to the treatment concentration and timing, with 20 patients in each group. Group A was rinsed with 0.9% saline 10 min after atomization inhalation, group B was rinsed with 2.5% saline 10 min after atomization inhalation, group C was rinsed with 0.9% saline 30 min after atomization inhalation, and group D was rinsed with 2.5% saline 30 min after atomization inhalation. The clinical efficacy, hospitalization indexes, nasal ventilation function and total incidence of complications were compared among the four groups. Results The total effective rate of group B was higher than that of groups A, C and D, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.008). The hospitalization time and respiratory improvement time of group B were shorter than those of groups A, C and D, and the hospitalization expense of group B was lower than that of groups A, C and D, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). After intervention, the total nasal resistance (RT) and nasal resistance difference ratio (Rlr) in group B were lower than those in groups A, C and D, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The total incidence of complications in group B was lower than that in groups A, C and D, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.008). Conclusion Nasal irrigation with 2.5% saline 10 min after ultrasonic atomization through nose and mouth is more beneficial to the improvement of nasal ventilation function and clinical efficacy in patients with chronic sinusitis.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
刘爽,马文成,隋强,等.鼻窦炎口服液联合布地奈德超声雾化鼻吸入对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎术后患者黏膜形态和功能转归的影响[J].陕西中医,2020,41(7):929-931.
|
[2] |
马淑巍,方旭华,陈洁.超声雾化及鼻窦负压置换联合药物治疗小儿慢性鼻窦炎的临床价值研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2019,18(14):1567-1569.
|
[3] |
江燕,齐银辉,胡慧娟,等.金莲花液雾化吸入对慢性鼻窦炎功能性内窥镜术后患者鼻通气功能,生活质量和血清炎性因子的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2021,21(2):316-319.
|
[4] |
张承宁.布地奈德雾化吸入在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴变应性鼻炎患者功能性内镜鼻窦术后的应用效果[J].中国民康医学,2021,33(17):55-57.
|
[5] |
朱婧,王在霞.超声雾化器雾化联合加速康复外科护理在慢性鼻窦炎患者中的应用效果分析[J].医学理论与实践,2021,34(18):3267-3269.
|
[6] |
中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会鼻科组,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会鼻科学组.中国慢性鼻窦炎诊断和治疗指南(2018)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2019,54(2):81-100.
|
[7] |
朱姝,王平,谢卓君,等.鼻炎片联合布地奈德鼻内雾化对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎术后的效果[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2020, 19(19):2064-2067.
|
[8] |
邵亮,袁自江,王耀华,等.自拟疏风清热方雾化吸入联合阿奇霉素治疗急性鼻窦炎(肺经风热证)的疗效观察[J].中国中医急症,2021,30(7):1288-1290.
|
[9] |
代红英,马婷婷.鼻窦炎口服液冲洗联合经鼻雾化吸入布地奈德混悬液对鼻息肉术后康复效果及血清细胞因子的影响[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2018,27(27):3035-3038.
|
[10] |
曲文学.特布他林联合布地奈德雾化吸入治疗支气管哮喘急性发作的临床价值研究[J].中国医药指南,2020,18(15):182-183.
|
[11] |
黎敏,吴赞,张玉明.鼻腔冲洗联合雾化吸入治疗婴幼儿肺炎的疗效观察[J].中国医药科学,2019,9(6):82-84.
|
[12] |
何燕红,阮彩棠,张水秀.高渗盐水雾化吸入后鼻腔冲洗时机对下呼吸道感染患儿的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2017, 23(22):98-100.
|
[13] |
朱秀娥,杨小红,伍海燕.不同浓度鼻腔冲洗联合鼻腔雾化治疗对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者鼻内镜术后疗效的影响分析[J].中国医学创新,2016,13(18):118-120.
|
[14] |
邵霞,刘卫娟,刘力行,等.鼻腔冲洗时机对婴幼儿下呼吸道感染分泌物清除的效果评估[J].中国当代医药,2016,23(35):111-113.
|
[15] |
钟晓晴,张琦.鼻腔冲洗联合规范雾化对喘息性支气管炎合并变应性鼻炎的疗效[J].岭南急诊医学杂志,2020, 25(1):85-86.
|
[16] |
张卉,万文锦.不同温度鼻腔冲洗液鼻窦炎伴/不伴鼻息肉患者术前行鼻腔冲洗对其症状的影响研究[J].中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2021,29(3):227-230.
|
[17] |
侯军才,赵艳庚.鼻腔冲洗方式对慢性鼻-鼻窦炎鼻内镜术后鼻腔粘连的影响[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2021, 28(10):650-652.
|
[18] |
郭永进.慢性鼻窦炎鼻息肉经功能性鼻内镜术后鼻腔冲洗联合糠酸莫米松喷雾剂治疗疗效观察[J].中国药物与临床,2020,20(12):2018-2020.
|
|
|
|