中国当代医药
   Apr. 5, 2025    Home                              中文
中国当代医药  2022, Vol. 29 Issue (16): 144-147    DOI:
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Effect comparison of internal and external drainage of renal pelvis decompression in the treatment of emergency ureteral calculi obstruction complicated with urinary sepsis
PENG Yeping FENG Zhenhua▲ HUANG Qiang LIANG Hao CHEN Xianguo
Department of Urology, Gaozhou People′s Hospital
Download: PDF (0 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Objective To compare the effect of percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) external drainage and transurethral ureteral stenting (US) internal drainage in the treatment of emergency ureteral calculi obstructive urinary sepsis.Methods A total of 102 patients with emergency ureteral calculi obstruction complicated with urinary sepsis in Gaozhou People′s Hospital from March 2018 to March 2021 were selected as the research objects, and the patients were divided into the external drainage group (52 cases) and the internal drainage group (50 cases) according to the simple randomization method. The external drainage group was treated with PCN, and the internal drainage group was treated with US.The success rate of renal pelvis decompression, infection control, surgical complications and postoperative quality of life were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences between the two groups in the success rate of renal pelvis decompression, the time of body temperature returning to normal, the time of white blood cell (WBC) returning to normal, the time of C-reactive protein returning to normal, the time of procalcitonin (PCT) returning to normal and the days of postoperative hospitalization (P＞0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of ureteropelvic stent perforation and renal hemorrhage between the two groups (P＞0.05). The incidence of postoperative back pain and sleep idsorders of the internal drainage group was lower than that in the external drainage group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The infection progression rate at 2 h after operation in the internal drainage group was higher than that in the external drainage group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion Both methods of renal pelvis decompression can effectively control ureteral calculi obstruction complicated with urinary sepsis, but the safety of PCN is better than that of US, and the comfort and quality of life after US are better than those after PCN. Therefore, in terms of treatment, it is necessary to consider the situation of patients and the technology of doctors, and choose the appropriate way of renal pelvis decompression.
Key words： Ureteral calculi      Urinary sepsis      Ureteral stent      Percutaneous nephrostomy     
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
PENG Yeping
FENG Zhenhua
HUANG Qiang
LIANG Hao
CHEN Xianguo
Cite this article:   
PENG Yeping,FENG Zhenhua,HUANG Qiang, et al. Effect comparison of internal and external drainage of renal pelvis decompression in the treatment of emergency ureteral calculi obstruction complicated with urinary sepsis[J]. 中国当代医药, 2022, 29(16): 144-147.
URL:  
https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/     OR     https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2022/V29/I16/144
Copyright © Editorial Board of 中国当代医药
Supported by:Beijing Magtech