微创经椎间孔减压腰椎融合内固定手术与传统后路开放手术治疗老年腰椎退行性疾病患者的效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (18)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (541 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the effect of minimally invasive surgery-ransforaminal decompression lumbar fusion and internal fixation (MIS-TLIF) with traditional open posterior approach for the treatment of elderly patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine.Methods A total of 120 elderly patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine in Shenyang Orthopaedic Hospital from November 2019 to October 2020 were selected as the research subjects,and they were divided into the control group (n=60) and the study group (n=60) by the random number table method.The control group was treated with traditional open posterior approach,and the study group was treated with MIS-TLIF.The clinical indicators of the two groups were compared,and the pain degree and quality of life before treatment and 1,3 months after treatment of the two groups were compared.Results The operative time of patients in the study group was (138.1±32.4) min,and the hospital stay was (7.4±3.0) d,which were shorter than (145.2±32.8) min and (9.8±2.5) d in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The intraoperative blood loss of patients in the study group was (253.6±121.9) ml,and the postoperative drainage volume was (24.8±8.2) ml,which were lower than (384.5±148.7) and (279.4±51.5) ml in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The incision length in the study group was (2.0±0.4) cm,which was smaller than (7.6±1.2) cm in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The visual analog scale (VAS)scores of patients in the study group at 1 and 3 months after treatment were (1.6±0.8) and (1.4±0.2) points,respectively,which were lower than (4.7±0.9) and (4.0±0.8) points in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores of patients in the study group at 1 and 3 months after treatment were (34.1±4.2) and (28.6±3.4) points,respectively,which were lower than (38.3±4.3) and (33.1±3.6) points in the control group,with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).The VAS and ODI scores at 1 and 3 months after treatment in the two groups were lower than those before treatment,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The VAS and ODI scores of the two groups at 3 months after treatment were lower than those at 1 month after treatment,and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion The application of MIS-TLIF in the treatment of elderly patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine has a good clinical effect,and can effectively reduce the pain of patients and improve the quality of life of patients,which is worthy of clinical application.

Key words： Minimally invasive surgery-ransforaminal decompression lumbar fusion and internal fixation Traditional open posterior approach Quality of life Oswestry disability index

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	MU Shengkai
	WANG Jingxu
	GONG Shuyi
	SHEN Yongle

Cite this article:

MU Shengkai,WANG Jingxu,GONG Shuyi, et al. Effect comparison of minimally invasive surgery-ransforaminal decompression lumbar fusion and internal fixation and internal fixation with traditional open posterior approach for treatment of elderly patients with degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine[J]. 中国当代医药, 2022, 29(14): 86-89.

URL:

https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2022/V29/I14/86

[1]	李士学，张为，孙亚澎，等.两种通道下MIS-TLIF 治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的对比研究[J].中华骨科杂志，2019，39（20）：1275-1284.
[2]	贾军，刘新宇，原所茂，等.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎间融合术后中期邻近节段影像学退变的比较[J].中华骨科杂志，2019，39（12）：766-773.
[3]	邢泽军，梅军，武晓飞，等.后正中入路和经通道椎旁入路椎间融合术治疗老年Ⅰ～Ⅱ度腰椎滑脱症患者的围术期分析[J].中华老年医学杂志，2020，39（3）：311-314.
[4]	张乐辉，赵易，邵峰.磁共振脊髓造影对腰椎退行性病变的诊断价值[J].首都医科大学学报，2007，28（3）：402-405.
[5]	王晖，钱普健，徐敏康，等.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术在老年人腰椎退行性疾病中的应用[J].中国老年学杂志，2020，40（21）：90-93.
[6]	楼超，刘飞俊，何登伟，等.经皮内镜下切除术联合斜外侧椎间融合术治疗合并间盘脱出的腰椎退行性疾病[J].中华骨科杂志，2020，40（8）：507-514.
[7]	张宇雷，李富平，西信，等.开放及微创经椎间孔入路椎间融合术后融合节段椎间隙高度及前凸恢复程度的比较研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志，2020，7（4）：422-427.
[8]	董健文，杨阳，陈子豪，等.显微内窥镜辅助与传统经椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较研究[J].中国修复重建外科杂志，2019，12（7）：814-821.
[9]	王晓陆，刘艺明，杜怡斌，等.微创经椎间孔入路椎体间融合术治疗双节段腰椎管狭窄症中远期疗效[J].实用医学杂志，2021，37（2）：149-153.
[10]	谢守宁，刘伟，韩生寿.两种手术方式治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄的比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志，2021，29（3）：211-215.
[11]	胡勇，钟建斌，袁振山，等.Dynesys 动态内固定联合减压治疗腰椎退行性疾病的中长期临床研究[J].中华骨科杂志，2021，41（17）：1188-1197.
[12]	章凯，罗科锋，蔡凯文，等.对比Dynesys 与椎间融合术治疗双节段腰椎退行性疾病的中长期疗效[J].中华骨科杂志，2021，41（17）：1180-1187.
[13]	房照，张阳，张立志，等.高龄腰椎退行性疾病患者后路减压融合手术的疗效及并发症[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志，2020，30（5）：22-27.
[14]	唐冲，刘正，吴四军，等.斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病疗效的meta 分析[J].中华骨科杂志，2019，39（21）：1320-1332.
[15]	姚依村，叶冬平，梁伟国，等.Coflex 棘突间动态稳定结合腰椎减压融合术治疗腰椎间盘退行性疾病的中期疗效[J].中国修复重建外科杂志，2019，33（3）：280-286.
[16]	秦超，熊健，文文，等.微创及开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体融合手术下腰椎退行性疾病患者的血清炎性因子与感染状况对比[J].中国老年学杂志，2020，40（6）：1248-1251.
[17]	达逸峰，王志浩，郑文凯，等.炎症因子及信号通路在腰椎退行性疾病中的研究进展[J].中华骨科杂志，2020，40（9）：597-606.
[18]	林书，胡豇，万仑，等.机器人辅助下微创与传统开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合治疗腰椎退行性疾病的疗效比较[J].重庆医学，2020，49（22）：151-156.