|
|
|
| Influence of cognitive behavioral intervention on mental health and quality of life in patients after permanent pacemaker implantation |
| PENG Min-an LIU Chuan-yin WAN Feng-fu WANG Xue-qiao YI Zhi-qiang LIU Duan-fu KUANG Linhua TIAN Ze-hong |
| Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ji′an Central People′s Hospital, Jiangxi Province, Ji′an 343000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the influence of cognitive behavior intervention on the mental health and quality of life of patients after permanent pacemaker implantation. Methods A total of 97 patients with permanent pacemaker implantation who were treated in our hospital from February 2014 to June 2018 were selected as the research subjects.They were randomly divided into the experimental group (49 cases) and the control group (48 cases) according to the lottery method. The control group used conventional health education method, and the experimental group used cognitive behavioral intervention method. The international standard anxiety scale (SAS) scores, self-anxiety scale (SDS)scores and the total scores of quality of life scale (SF-36) were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the SAS scores between the two groups before surgery (P＞0.05). The SAS scores at 1, 3, 6 months after surgery in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in the SDS scores between the two groups before surgery (P＞0.05). The SDS scores at 1, 3, 6 months after surgery in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in the total score of SF-36 between the two groups before surgery (P＜0.05). The total scores of SF-36 at 1,3, 6 months after surgery in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group (P＜0.05). The SDS scores and SAS scores of the two groups at 1, 3, 6 months after surgery were lower than those before surgery, and the total SF-36 scores of the two groups at 1, 3, 6 months after surgery were higher than those before surgery (P＜0.05).Conclusion Cognitive-behavioral intervention can significantly improve the mental health and quality of life of patients after pacemaker implantation, and is worthy of clinical promotion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
段泉泉，胜利.焦虑及抑郁自评量表的临床效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志，2012，12（9）：43-46.
|
| [2] |
欧阳彦，潘晓霞，王朝晖，等.SF-36 量表评估Fabry 病患者生活质量的研究[J].中华肾脏病杂志，2014，30（3）：201-205.
|
| [3] |
王小鹏，何丽，周铭，等.永久性心脏起搏器植入老年患者术后起搏器囊袋感染风险因素研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志，2019，14（16）：18-19.
|
| [4] |
栾春红，高登峰，杨新利，等.心脏永久起搏器植入术后治疗效果及并发症的临床分析[J].湖南师范大学学报（医学版），2019，22（4）：14-17.
|
| [5] |
徐慧琳.常规心电图与动态心电图对起搏器植入术后患者心律失常的诊断比较[J].中国现代医生，2018，56（31）：29-32.
|
| [6] |
王艳萍，李利军，李惠.自制透明压迫袋在永久起搏器植入术后护理中的应用[J].中国当代医药，2018，25（27）：204-206.
|
| [6] |
刘霞，张友良，唐媛，等.永久性心脏起搏器植入相关并发症及原因分析[J].中国临床研究，2018，31（6）：800-802.
|
| [7] |
王月芳.品管圈对降低永久性心脏起搏器植入术后并发症的影响[J].护理实践与研究，2017，14（24）：61-63.
|
| [8] |
金献萍，贾赟丽，蓝春晗，等.早期下床对主动固定电极起搏器术后并发症的影响[J].护士进修杂志，2014，22（19）：1736-1738.
|
| [9] |
Monteiro C，Ferrari ADL，Caramori PRA，et al.Permanent Pacing After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation：Incidence，Predictors and Evolution of Left Ventricular Function[J].Arq Bras Cardiol，2017，109（6）：550-559.
|
| [10] |
李琦，姚亚丽，韩冰，等.早期下床活动对心脏永久起搏器植入术后患者电极性能的影响[J].解放军护理杂志，2019，12（6）：23-25.
|
| [11] |
赵小静.起搏器植入患者社会支持、积极心理资本与生活质量的相关性研究[D].济南：山东大学，2017.
|
| [12] |
王晓庆，李萍，王素梅.结构性心理干预对永久起搏器植入患者自我效能和生活质量的影响[J].现代中西医结合杂志，2016，18（29）：3291-3293.
|
| [13] |
顾丽萍，于文敏.结构性心理干预对永久心脏起搏器植入病人负性情绪、生活质量及自我效能的影响[J].安徽医药，2019，23（10）：2001-2004.
|
| [14] |
袁静，詹惠敏，谢缤纷，等.综合护理在人工心脏起搏器安置术患者中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志，2017，23（15）：91-92.
|
| [15] |
郭成军，岳美丽，郭成军，等.6 例无导线起搏器植入患者的护理[J].中华现代护理杂志，2019，25（6）：781.
|
| [16] |
李坚.健康教育对永久性心脏起搏器植入术后的护理作用研究[J].中国社区医师，2016，11（23）：165.
|
| [17] |
冯艮娇，罗思妮，杨满青.心脏起搏器植入术后患者心理状况和生活质量的调查与分析[J].岭南心血管病杂志，2012，18（6）：632-633.
|
|
|
|
