|
|
Diagnostic value of diffusion tensor imaging in differential of hyperacute and acute ischemic cerebral infarction |
LIU Lanxiang |
Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People′s Hospital, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510180, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the diagnostic value of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in the differential of hyperacute and acute ischemic cerebral infarction (CIS). Methods A total of 63 patients with CIS within 72 hours of onset treated in Guangzhou First People′s Hospital from January to August 2020 were selected as the research objects, and they were divided into hyperacute CIS group (24 cases) and acute CIS group (39 cases) according to their time phases. Both groups were examined by magnetic resonance DTI. The tractional anisotropy index (FA), volume ratio anisotropy index(VRA), average diffusion coefficient (DCavg), exponential attenuation index (Exat) and other related parameters at the focus and the opposite side of the mirror were counted, and the relative value of FA (rFA), the relative value of VRA(rVRA) and the relative value of DCavg (rDCavg) were compared between the two groups. Results FA, VRA and DCavg in the focus of acute CIS group were lower than those on the opposite side of the mirror image, while Exat was higher than that on the opposite side of the mirror image, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). DCavg at the focus of hyperacute CIS group was lower than that on the opposite side of the mirror, Exat was higher than that on the opposite side of the mirror, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05), there were no significant differences in FA and VRA between the focus and the opposite side of the mirror (P>0.05). rFA, rVRA and rDCavg at the focus and the opposite side of the mirror in hyperacute CIS group were higher than those in acute CIS group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in rexat between the two groups (P>0.05). The area under the curve of rFA, rVRA and rDCavg in differentiating hyperacute CIS and acute CIS were 0.953, 0.971 and 0.832 respectively. Conclusion There are some differences in DTI parameters between hyperacute and acute ischemic CIS, and DTI related parameters can provide a good reference value for the differential diagnosis of them.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
蔡珍飞,吴肖萍,曹丹.2017年台州地区急性脑梗死发生的流行特征[J].实用预防医学,2019,26(10):101-104.
|
[2] |
陈帆,周少英.MRI 检查DTI 序列对急性脑梗死诊断及预后评估价值研究[J].中国CT 和MRI 杂志,2020,18(12):19-21.
|
[3] |
柯灿泽,黄志明,刘向华,等.CT 薄层重建与弥散加权成像技术在急性腔隙性脑梗死诊断中的对比研究[J].黑龙江医学,2019,22(5):499-501.
|
[4] |
何碧文.磁共振弥散加权成像在急性脑梗死诊断中的应用价值[J].中国实用医药,2019,14(24):22-24.
|
[5] |
党保华,赵鑫,宋q 娟,等.MR 弥散张量成像对缺氧缺血性脑病的Meta 分析报告[J].中国CT 和MRI 杂志,2019,17(1):5-9.
|
[6] |
菅超,陈维亮.磁共振弥散张量成像及动脉自旋标记成像在缺血性脑梗死诊断及分期中的应用价值[J].新乡医学院学报,2020,37(7):648-651.
|
[7] |
侯瑞丽,牛文亮,刘波,等.青年,老年脑梗死患者流行病学分布比较及影响因素分析[J].中国现代医生,2019,57(16):9-13.
|
[8] |
中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J].中华神经科杂志,2018,51(9):666-682.
|
[9] |
王道仁.CT 与磁共振成像对多发性脑梗死诊断价值对比研究[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(11):1803-1804.
|
[10] |
王云柯.磁共振弥散张量成像在评估脑梗死患者运动功能康复治疗效果中的应用价值[J].影像技术,2020,32(1):42-44.
|
[11] |
Nael K,Trouard TP,Lafleur SR,et al.White Matter Ischemic Changes in Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke:Voxel-Based Analysis Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging and MR Perfusion[J].Stroke,2015,46(2):413-418.
|
[12] |
李磊.磁共振弥散张量成像在脑梗死亚急性期患者康复水平评估中的应用探讨[J].医学理论与实践,2019,32(24):4050-4051.
|
[13] |
戴真煜,陈飞,姚立正,等.磁共振扩散张量成像在急性缺血性脑梗死时相判断中的应用[J].中华医学杂志,2015,26(31):2526-2531.
|
[14] |
秦剑锋,杨晓生,邓少烽.DTI 在超急性和急性缺血性脑梗死鉴别诊断中的效果[J].临床医学工程,2017,24(6):739-740.
|
[15] |
刘建航,刘昊,陈道云,等.磁共振弥散张量成像技术在临床疾病诊治过程中更多的优势和价值[J].中国组织工程研究,2019,23(8):99-105.
|
[16] |
戴真煜,陈飞,姚立正,等.磁共振扩散张量成像和三维伪连续动脉自旋标记在鉴别超急性与急性缺血性脑梗死中的联合应用[J].中华医学杂志,2018,98(17):1327-1332.
|
[17] |
汤奉琼,李洪义.老年超急性与急性缺血性脑梗死患者磁共振弥散张量成像特征比较[J].中国老年学杂志,2020,40(8):34-37.
|
[18] |
赵晓华.磁共振弥散张量成像在不同时期脑梗死早期诊断中的应用[J].实用医学影像杂志,2020,21(1):83-84.
|
|
|
|