|
|
Study on percutaneous immune effect of Clostridium difficile toxoid A mediated by microneedle |
HE Jingrong ZHANG Yi DAI Wenxiu WANG Yueying FU Siwu▲ |
Medical College,Northwest Minzu University,Gansu Province,Lanzhou 730030,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective The effect of two different immunization methods on the titer of Clostridium difficile toxoid A were compared to explore the transdermal immune effect of microneedle-mediated Clostridium difficile vaccine.Meth-ods After preparing Clostridium difficile toxoid A vaccine by dialysis,culture,purification,detoxification,twenty-four 18-22 g female BALB/c mice(SPF grade)were selected.They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method,with 12 mice in each group.The control group was given intraperitoneal injection,and the observation group was immunized with microneedles percutaneously.At the 0,7th,14th,28th and 42th day of treatment,the titer levels of specific serum immunoglobulin G(IgG)and fecal secretory immunoglobulin A(IgA)were regularly detected.Finally,the actual immune effect of microneedle percutaneous immunization was evaluated by Clostridium difficile animal infection experiment.Results The serum antibody IgG titer of the two groups at the 42th day of treatment was higher than that at the 7th,14th and 28th day of treatment,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the titer of serum antibody IgG between the two groups at the 14th,28th and 42th day of treatment(P>0.05).The fecal IgA titer of the two groups at the 42th day of treatment was higher than that at the 7th,14th and 28th day of treatment,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in fecal IgA titer between the two groups at the 7th day(P>0.05).The fecal IgA titer of the observation group at the 14th,28th and 42th day of treatment was higher than that of the control group in the same period,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no death in both groups after challenge,and the percutaneous immune effect was good.After the mice were killed,compared with the mucosal epithelial ulcer and severe mucosal inflammation in the unimmunized mice,the inflammatory reactions in both groups were mild.Conclusion Microneedle-mediated Clostridium difficile toxin A vaccine has good mucosal immune effect.
|
Received: 17 June 2021
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Czepiel J,Drózdz M,Pituch H,et al.Clostridium difficileinfection:review[J].Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis,2019,38(7):1211-1221.
|
[5] |
邓洁华,王刚生,张晓光,等.免疫抑制BALB/c 小鼠侵袭性白念珠菌感染动物模型的建立[J].医学动物防制,2021,37(9):838-841,919.
|
[6] |
赵维静,赵建伟,胡译文,等.表面展示狂犬病病毒糖蛋白的重组乳酸菌的构建及其免疫原性的研究[J].中国兽医科学,2019,49(4):432-439.
|
[2] |
Song JH,Kim YS.RecurrentClostridium difficileInfection:Risk Factors,Treatment,and Prevention[J].Gut Liver,2019,13(1):16-24.
|
[3] |
Rao K,Malani PN.Diagnosis and Treatment ofClostridioides(Clostridium)difficileInfection in Adults in 2020[J].JAMA,2020,323(14):1403-1404.
|
[4] |
Matsuoka O,Patel DM,Sasaki S,et al.Safety and immunogenicity ofClostridium difficiletoxoid vaccine in Japanese adults[J].Hum Vaccin Immunother,2018,14(2):322-328.
|
[7] |
Waghule T,Singhvi G,Dubey SK,et al.Microneedles:A smart approach and increasing potential for transdermal drug delivery system[J].Biomed Pharmacother,2019,109:1249-1258.
|
|
|
|