Super PATH微创髋关节置换术和常规髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (34 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the effect of Super PATH minimally invasive hip replacement and conventional hip replacement in the treatment of elderly femoral neck fractures. Methods A total of 54 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures admitted to our hospital from August 2016 to August 2019 were divided into the control group (n=27)and the study group (n=27) according to the random number table method. The control group underwent conventional hip arthroplasty. The study group underwent Super PATH minimally invasive hip replacement. The intraoperative indicators, postoperative pain, and hip function scores of patients of the two groups were observed. Results The operation time of the study group was longer than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); the length of the surgical incision was shorter than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative pain score were lower than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05); the hip function score of the study group was higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion Super PATH minimally invasive hip replacement has certain advantages in reducing intraoperative blood loss, relieving postoperative pain, reducing wounds, and better improving hip function. The disadvantage is that it lengthens the operation time.

Key words： Super PATH minimally invasive hip replacement Femoral neck fracture Conventional hip arthroplasty;Hip function

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	LI Jing-yu
	LU Jian-qi
	CAI Zhong-bin
	QIAO Ju-feng

Cite this article:

LI Jing-yu,LU Jian-qi,CAI Zhong-bin, et al. Effect comparison of Super PATH minimally invasive hip replacement and conventional hip replacement in the treatment of elderly femoral neck fractures[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(28): 140-142转146.

URL:

https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR https://www.dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2020/V27/I28/140

[1]	赵乐，李强，徐斌.应用SuperPATH 微创入路半髋关节置换术治疗高龄患者股骨颈骨折的临床疗效分析[J].当代医学，2019（36）：144-146.
[2]	颜汉平，刘伟，严志强，等.Super PATH 微创入路髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折的效果观察[J].广东医科大学学报，2019，37（4）：410-412.
[3]	汪玉中.人工髋关节置换术联合活血通络汤治疗股骨头坏死效果观察[J].实用中医药杂志，2019，35（4）：473-474.
[4]	刘波，陈元英，韩宜印，等.Super PATH 全髋置换与全髋关节置换术的近期疗效对比分析[J].创伤外科杂志，2019，21（3）：217-219.
[5]	张涵，员晋，兰海.Super PATH 微创髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志，2018，20（5）：400-406.
[6]	李建，邱冰，甄东.Super PATH 入路与传统入路髋关节置换临床疗效的Meta 分析[J].中国组织工程研究，2018，22（15）：2453-2460.
[7]	陈振，程宏涛.半髋关节置换术与全髋关节置换术对老年股骨颈骨折患者预后的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践，2019，4（35）：66-67.
[8]	丁维忠.腰硬联合麻醉与全身麻醉在老年患者股骨颈骨折手术中的效果观察[J].基层医学论坛，2019，23（35）：5163-5164.
[9]	高京平.全髋关节置换术对老年股骨颈骨折患者并发症及生活质量的影响[J].临床合理用药杂志，2019，12（34）：170-171.
[10]	林榕镔，尹金铭，林家永，等.全髋关节置换术治疗对股骨颈骨折患者的有效性及并发症的影响[J].解放军预防医学杂志，2019，37（11）：116-117.
[11]	吕瑞岩，吕明刚.全髋关节置换术与半髋关节置换术在股骨颈骨折治疗中的疗效对比[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志，2019，6（33）：42，44.
[12]	符浩.全髋关节置换术与人工股骨头置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折效果比较[J].智慧健康，2019，5（33）：198-199.
[13]	董万民.全髋关节置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折临床分析[J].河南外科学杂志，2019，25（6）：115-116.
[14]	解建飞.老年人股骨颈骨折髋关节置换的临床疗效分析[J].世界最新医学信息文摘，2019，19（89）：100-101.
[15]	张云，程国徽，路祥德，等.髋关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的手术治疗[J].临床骨科杂志，2019，22（6）：762.