活髓牙失活后根管与拔髓后根管治疗牙髓炎的效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (30 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the effect of endodontic treatment of pulpitis after inactivation of living pulp teeth and root canal extraction. Methods A total of 86 patients with pulpitis who were admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to April 2019 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into two groups according to the time of admission, and each had 43 patients. The observation group was treated with root canal after inactivation of the living pulp teeth,and the control group was treated with root canal after extubation. The patients were followed up for 4 months after treatment, the efficacy were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); the incidence of pain in the observation group after treatment was lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); The rate of acute reaction occurred in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); the total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion Compared with root canal treatment after pulp extraction, root canal treatment after active pulp tooth deactivation can significantly improve the efficacy of pulpitis, improve pain, and have fewer adverse reactions.

Key words： Inactivation of living pulp teeth Root canal therapy Extubation Total effective rate Incidence of pain;Incidence of adverse reactions

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHAO Ying-jie
	ZHANG Xiao-jiao

Cite this article:

ZHAO Ying-jie,ZHANG Xiao-jiao. Effect comparison of root canal and post-myelinus root canal in the treatment of pulpitis after inactivation of vital pulp[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(19): 159-161.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2020/V27/I19/159

[1]	郑丽明.活髓牙失活后根管治疗与拔髓后根管治疗的效果对比[J].中外医学研究，2017，15（14）：120-121.
[2]	张蓉，赵莉，木合塔尔·霍加.超声冲洗用于慢性牙髓炎一次法根管治疗术的临床评价[J].口腔材料器械杂志，2015，12（3）：58-62.
[3]	张莉.多次法根管治疗和一次性根管治疗在牙体牙髓病患者者中的疗效对比观察及对咀嚼功能的影响研究[J].科教导刊，2017（1）：185.
[4]	周君.一次根管治疗对牙体牙髓病患者者症状改善情况的影响分析[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志，2017，4（5）：28-29.
[5]	柯贤安.一次法和多次法根管治疗慢性牙髓炎疗效及对术后疼痛的影响[J].临床医学研究与实践，2017，2（8）：62-63.
[6]	韩露，李雷.探讨接受根管治疗后的患者进行正畸治疗对其牙根吸收程度的影响[J].当代医药论丛，2018，16（22）：62-63.
[7]	黄正蔚.根管治疗术后疼痛的原因与对策[J].中国实用口腔科杂志，2018，11（4）：200-203.
[8]	吴昱.根管治疗后牙体修复的方式及应用效果分析[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志，2017，4（12）：60-61.
[9]	戚慧，宋治锋.根管治疗后疾患者者80 例的临床分析[J].中南医学科学杂志，2018，46（1）：73-74.
[10]	宋衍杰.口腔根管治疗牙髓根尖周病的临床疗效分析及对患者生活质量的影响[J].中外医疗，2018，37（30）：46-48.
[11]	刘贺，钱君荣，马海峰，等.根管内冷冻疗法对活髓牙一次性根管治疗术后疼痛影响研究[J].陕西医学杂志，2018，47（8）：1014-1016.
[12]	刘聪颖.不同根管治疗法对牙体牙髓患者者的临床疗效对比分析[J].中国医药指南，2018，16（34）：120-121.
[13]	李合田，刘哲，卢颖.口腔根管治疗牙髓根尖周病的临床疗效分析[J].世界最新医学信息文摘，2017，16（36）：48-49.
[14]	陈建兵.根尖周炎患者经一次性根管治疗术和常规根管治疗术治疗的临床效果比较[J].临床医学研究与实践，2017，2（31）：84-85.
[15]	李素卿，童新文.三种应急治疗方法对急性牙髓炎止痛效果比较分析[J].中国实用口腔科杂志，2015，8（10）：619-620.