宫腔镜电切术与宫腔镜下诊刮术治疗子宫内膜息肉患者的临床效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (16)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (35 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To compare the clinical effects of hysteroscopic electrotomy and hysteroscopic curettage in patients with endometrial polyps. Methods A retrospective analysis of 76 patients with endometrial polyps diagnosed based on pathological results in our hospital from January 2017 to October 2019 was selected. They were divided into control group (n=36) and observation group (n=40) according to different surgical methods. In the control group, hysteroscopic curettage was used, and in the observation group, hysteroscopic electrotomy was applied. The overall response rate, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, menstrual time and volume, and incidence of complications and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups. Results The overall response rate of the observation group was 95.00, which was higher than that of the control group of 80.56%, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The amount of intraoperative bleeding in the observation group was less than that in the control group, and the operation time and hospital stay were shorter than those in the control group, with statistical differences(P＜0.05). The menstrual time of the observation group was shorter than that in the control, and the menstrual volume was less compared with the control group, with statistical differences (P＜0.05). The total complication rate and recurrence rate of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion Compared with hysteroscopic curettage, hysteroscopic electrotomy has better curative effect on endometrial polyps, which can reduce surgical trauma, shorten the operation and hospital stay, improve their menstrual status and reduce the occurrence of complications. The recurrence rate is low and the safety is high, which is worthy of clinical application.

Key words： Endometrial polyps Hysteroscopy Curettage Electrotomy Safety Complications

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	OUYANG Wen
	LIU Feng-ping

Cite this article:

OUYANG Wen,LIU Feng-ping. Comparison of clinical effect between hysteroscopic electrotomy and hysteroscopic curettage in patients with endometrial polyps[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(19): 145-148.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2020/V27/I19/145

[1]	崔婷，夏亚芳，高娟，等.宫腔镜电切术治疗子宫内膜息肉的临床疗效及安全性分析[J].江苏医药，2017，43（10）：740-742.
[2]	周艳，毛小英，王群丽，等.宫腔镜电切术联合孕激素治疗子宫内膜息肉的疗效分析[J].浙江临床医学，2015，17（5）：799-800.
[3]	李建霞，孙彩芹.宫腔镜电切术联合左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统治疗子宫内膜息肉的临床疗效分析[J].现代妇产科进展，2016，25（7）：529-531.
[4]	徐敏，王春桃，许丹，等.宫腔镜电切术治疗子宫内膜息肉的临床疗效分析[J].东南大学学报（医学版），2017，36（5）：742-745.
[5]	包飞飞，吴解清，杨凡，等.宫腔镜电切术在子宫内膜息肉手术中的85 例疗效观察[J].浙江中医药大学学报，2014，38（5）：598-600.
[6]	李友荣，王仲奇.宫腔镜电切术与单纯刮宫术治疗复发性子宫内膜息肉的效果对比分析[J].解放军医药杂志，2018，30（3）：88-90.
[7]	姜雪，姜荣格，卢立春，等.子宫内膜息肉致子宫出血患者经宫腔镜电切术治疗后的效果及并发症发生情况观察[J].中国妇幼保健，2018，33（21）：4984-4986.
[8]	廖玲，杨翠木，朱永婷，等.宫腔镜电切术治疗52 例子宫内膜息肉患者的临床观察[J].中国医师杂志，2019，21（8）：1263-1265.
[9]	姜志林.宫腔镜电切术结合左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统治疗子宫内膜息肉的预后效果观察[J].中国医药科学，2019，9（10）：115-118.
[10]	赵运霞.宫腔镜电切术治疗子宫内膜息肉致异常子宫出血的疗效及安全性分析[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志，2017，4（33）：122-123.
[11]	刘菊红，唐世倩，褚春芳，等.宫腔镜电切术联合曼月乐环治疗复发性子宫内膜息肉的效果分析[J].解放军预防医学杂志，2019，37（7）：63-65.
[12]	刘芸.宫腔镜电切术与刮宫术对子宫内膜息肉患者月经期及经量的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志，2018，22（13）：117-119.
[13]	徐海英，胡君华.宫腔镜电切术治疗子宫内膜息肉导致的异常子宫出血的疗效观察[J].中国基层医药，2017，24（10）：1551-1554.
[14]	陈惠惠.宫腔镜电切术治疗子宫内膜息肉的疗效及安全性研究[J].中国现代医学杂志，2019，29（16）：113-116.
[15]	甘露.宫腔镜电切术治疗子宫内膜息肉致异常子宫出血的安全性及疗效分析[J].实用妇科内分泌电子杂志，2019，6（23）：45.
[16]	王娟，李燕，马俊旗，等.宫腔镜电切术联合左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统治疗子宫内膜息肉的效果及安全性分析[J].中国妇幼保健，2017，32（9）：2035-2037.