外翻式颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄的临床效果

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (20)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (35 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical application effect of valgus carotid endarterectomy in the treatment of carotid stenosis.Methods A total of 50 patients with carotid stenosis who were admitted to our hospital from September 2014 to August 2019 were selected as the research subjects.According to the random number table method, they were divided into the control group (25 cases) and the observation group (25 cases).The control group was given classic carotid endarterectomy, and the observation group was given valgus carotid endarterectomy.The duration of surgery,length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and clinical efficacy were compared between the two groups.Results The duration of surgery and the length of hospital stay in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).The total incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The plaque area in the observation group was smaller than that in the control group, and the intima-media thickness (IMT) in the observation group was thicker than that in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion The clinical application effect of valgus carotid endarterectomy in the treatment of carotid stenosis is favorable, which can shorten the duration of surgery and the length of stay, reduce the incidence of postoperative complications, and has a higher application value.

Key words： Valgus carotid endarterectomy Carotid stenosis Surgery timing Length of stay

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	YANG Pu-gen
	OUYANG Liang-yuan
	LIU Jun
	SHEN Bo
	WU Jing

Cite this article:

YANG Pu-gen,OUYANG Liang-yuan,LIU Jun, et al. Clinical effect of valgus carotid endarterectomy in the treatment of carotid stenosis[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(22): 62-65.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2020/V27/I22/62

[1]	毛振立，王丽敏，王国栋，等.颈动脉内膜剥脱术与支架置入术治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄疗效对比[J].中国现代医药杂志，2019，21（9）：83-85.
[2]	林玉廷，仇红伟，任英杰，等.颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄21例临床分析[J].人民军医，2019，62（9）：860-863.
[3]	李红普，张雷，朱盛兴.颈动脉内膜剥脱术三种术式治疗颈动脉狭窄的临床效果[J].临床医学研究与实践，2019，4（24）：61-63.
[4]	Kang HM，Choi JH，Koh HJ，et al.Significant changes of the choroid in patients with ocular ischemic syndrome and symptomatic carotid artery stenosis[J].PLoS One，2019，14（10）：e0224210.
[5]	刘小明，包凌云，方建华，等.颈动脉多普勒超声指标对颈动脉内膜剥脱术和颈动脉支架置入术术后再狭窄程度的诊断价值[J].中国全科医学，2019，22（15）：1869-1873.
[6]	Vang S，Hans SS.Carotid endarterectomy in patients with high plaque[J].Surgery，2019，166（4）：601-606.
[8]	李春辉，朱骁，陈涛，等.颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄支架术后再狭窄的临床研究[J].中国现代医学杂志，2019，29（5）：87-91.
[7]	Mantella LE，Colledanchise KN，Hétu MF，et al.Carotid intraplaque neovascularization predicts coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events[J].Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging，2019，20（11）：1239-1247.
[9]	杨威.颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄的临床效果[J].临床医学研究与实践，2019，4（2）：34-35.
[10]	蓝莎利，沈健，姚瀚勋，等.颈动脉内膜剥脱术后并发症的护理[J].浙江实用医学，2018，23（6）：455-457.
[11]	沈茜.颈动脉狭窄行内膜剥脱术患者1 例围术期的血压管理[J].临床合理用药杂志，2018，11（34）：168-170.
[12]	高晨琛，丰育功，李环廷，等.颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄（附40 例临床分析）[J].中国现代手术学杂志，2015，19（6）：431-435.
[13]	宋平，陈晓斌，杜浩，等.内膜斑块剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄的临床分析[J].中国临床神经外科杂志，2016，21（9）：527-529.
[14]	曹慧，封晓燕，黄亚波.颈动脉内膜剥脱术19 例围手术期护理[J].当代医学，2014，20（31）：108-110.
[15]	韩晓亮，武建英，王琨.颈动脉内膜剥脱治疗颈动脉狭窄的临床研究[J].医学信息，2015，28（2）：89.
[16]	李金勇，樊雪强，叶志东，等.分期颈动脉内膜剥脱与支架治疗双侧颈动脉狭窄的临床疗效[J].中国血管外科杂志（电子版），2017，9（1）：27-31.
[17]	刘正军，陆京伯，刘灏，等.改良式颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄：附2 例报道[J].南方医科大学学报，2017，37（8）：1140-1142.
[18]	刘丁，张蕾.探讨颈动脉支架置入术治疗症状型颈动脉狭窄患者的疗效及安全性[J].中国医疗器械信息，2019，25（20）：91-92.
[19]	张斌，徐兴国，张慧婷，等.颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄的临床疗效分析[J].临床神经外科杂志，2019，16（5）：406-409.
[20]	唐志鹏，陈荣举，李沿东，等.颈动脉内膜剥脱术治疗颈动脉狭窄患者的疗效及安全性研究[J].中国医药指南，2019，17（28）：16-17.