麦默通微创旋切术与小切口传统手术治疗良性乳腺结节的效果比较

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (15)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (31 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To investigate the effect of minimally invasive rotary incision and traditional small incision surgery on the treatment of benign breast nodules. Methods A total of 75 breast nodule patients admitted in our hospital from November 2018 to November 2019 were selected as the research subjects. They were divided into a reference group (38 cases) and an experimental group (37 cases) according to the lottery method. The reference group was treated with a small incision, in the traditional surgical treatment, the experimental group was treated with Mymotomy minimally invasive rotary resection. The clinical treatment effect, surgical status and hospital stay, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results The clinical treatment excellent rate in the experimental group was higher than that in the reference group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The intraoperative blood loss in the experimental group was lower than that in the reference group, the length of the incision was shorter than that in the reference group, and the operation time and hospital stay were shorter than those in the reference group, and the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the reference group, and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional operation with small incision, the clinical effect of mammotome minimally invasive surgery for benign breast nodules is better, and it can reduce the amount of bleeding, the length of incision, the time of operation and hospitalization, and the rate of complications.

Key words： Traditional small incision surgery Benign breast nodules Mymotomy minimally invasive resection Complications

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	TIAN Shao-lin
	CHEN Bo

Cite this article:

TIAN Shao-lin,CHEN Bo. Effect comparison of Mametong minimally invasive rotary resection and traditional small incision on the treament of benign breast nodules[J]. 中国当代医药, 2020, 27(19): 115-117.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2020/V27/I19/115

[1]	吴忠亮，刘岩山，启明星，等.他莫西芬联合微波消融术治疗乳腺增生结节的疗效评价[J].河北医科大学学报，2017，38（12）：1451-1454.
[2]	洪中武，傅健飞，徐熙善.手术联合乳癖散结胶囊治疗乳腺增生结节的疗效分析[J].中国全科医学，2009，12（10）：900-901.
[3]	Bini F，Trimboli P，Marinozzi F，et al.Treatment of benign thyroid nodules by high intensity focused ultrasound （HIFU） at different acoustic powers：a study on in-silico phantom[J].Endocrine，2017，59（3）：506-509.
[4]	许南敢.乳腺微创旋切术治疗临床触诊阴性乳腺结节的疗效[J].江苏医药，2019，45（2）：96-97.
[5]	张馨，任宇，黄建军，马晓霞.乳腺微创旋切术切除乳腺不可触及结节的临床价值分析[J].保健医学研究与实践，2019，16（4）：67-69.
[6]	韩继攀.麦默通微创旋切术与小切口传统手术在触诊阴性乳腺结节治疗中的效果比较[J].华夏医学，2019，32（1）：27-29.
[7]	Minig L，Achilarre MT，Garbi A，et al.Minimally invasive surgery to treat gynecological cancer：conventional laparoscopy and/or robot-assisted surgery[J].Int J Gynecol Cancer，2017，27（3）：1.
[8]	樊晓霞，唐杰瑶，高秀丽.麦默通微创旋切术与小切口传统手术治疗乳腺结节的疗效比较[J].内蒙古医科大学学报，2018，40（S1）：214-216.
[9]	谭艳芳.超声引导下真空辅助微创旋切治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的临床效果[J].中国当代医药，2019，26（36）：83-85.
[10]	赵娜，陈士彬，刘翠珠，等.豪洛捷乳腺结节真空旋切术治疗触诊阴性乳腺结节的临床效果[J].中国医药导报，2017，14（16）：51-54.
[11]	万红霞.麦默通微创旋切术与小切口传统手术治疗触诊阴性乳腺结节的疗效比较[J].微创医学，2017，12（1）：106-108，34.
[12]	施建伟，谢红方.超声引导乳腺微创旋切术治疗乳腺结节（BIRADSⅡ～Ⅲ级）的疗效观察[J].现代实用医学，2017，29（2）：249-250.
[13]	方红，赵子伟，韩雪，等.麦默通微创旋切术切除直径1 cm 良性乳腺肿块的临床疗效及其对病人免疫功能的影响[J].临床外科杂志，2019，27（3）：205-208.
[14]	许南敢.乳腺微创旋切术治疗临床触诊阴性乳腺结节的疗效[J].江苏医药，2019，45（2）：198-199.
[15]	王蓉，郑媛，钱崇崴，等.麦默通旋切术治疗乳腺导管内乳头状瘤疗效观察[J].医学临床研究，2018，35（9）：1844-1845.