|
|
|
| Clinical application effect of the modified midline catheter |
| HU Linai1 XU Yuehong2▲ ZHANG Huilan3 WAN Xiaofang4 XU Yueyuan5 |
1.Department of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology,People′s Hospital of Yingtan,Jiangxi Province,Yingtan 335000,China;
2.Department of Nursing,People′s Hospital of Yingtan,Jiangxi Province,Yingtan 335000,China;
3.Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,People′s Hospital of Yingtan,Jiangxi Province,Yingtan 335000,China;
4.Department of General Practice Medicine,People′s Hospital of Yingtan,Jiangxi Province,Yingtan 335000,China;
5.Department of Ophthalmology,Nanchang First Hospital,Jiangxi Province,Nanchang 330008,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the clinical application effect of the modified midline catheter.Methods A total of 125 patients required infusion of stimulating vascular drugs admitted to Yingtan People′s Hospital from January 2019 to October 2020 were selected retrospectively selected,and divided into four groups in the central venous catheter (PICC)group (25 cases),central venous catheter (CVC) group (25 cases),peripheral indwelling needle (PVC) group (37 cases),and midline catheter (MC) group (38 cases).The MC group had mechanical lebitis,mechanical phlebitis,drug extravasation,catheter-related infections,catheter-related thrombosis,and one-time puncture success rates were compared with the other three groups.Results The overall incidence of complications in the MC group was lower than that in the PICC group,CVC group,and PVC group,with statistically significant difference (P＜0.05).The incidence of mechanical phlebitis in the MC group was lower than that in the PICC group and PVC group,and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The incidence of mechanical phlebitis between the MC group and CVC group with no significant difference (P＞0.05).The incidence of drug extravasation in MC group was lower than that in PVC group,and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The incidence of catheter-associated infection in the MC group was lower than that in the CVC group,and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).The incidence of catheter-associated thrombosis in the MC group was lower than that in the PVC group,and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).The success rate of one-time puncture in the MC group was higher than that in the PICC group,CVC group and PVC group,and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion The modified midline catheter has the advantages of relatively simple operation,small trauma and less complications,and has good clinical application prospects,and is worth clinical promotion and application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
中华人民共和国卫生部．WS/T 433-2013 静脉治疗护理技术操作规范[S].北京：中国标准出版社，2014.
|
| [2] |
樊孟涛，龙勇，苏彦河.肺叶扫除术患者中心静脉导管相关性血栓形成的危险因素分析[J].中国现代医药杂志，2021，23（2）：27-30.
|
| [3] |
Chernecky C，Macklin D，Blackburn P.Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections （CR-BSI） in Geriatric Patients in Intensive Care Units[J].Crit Care Nurs Q，2015，38（3）：280-292.
|
| [4] |
王威，王霞，邱靖.连续护理对首次PICC 置管出院肿瘤患者并发症发生率的效果观察[J].当代护士，2019，26（13）：138-140.
|
| [5] |
沈艳芳，候晓婷，杨红，等.集束化管理对中心静脉导管留置期间医用粘胶相关性皮肤损伤影响[J].中国临床医生杂志，2019，47（5）：622-625.
|
| [6] |
吕友红，薛敏芬.地塞米松联合水胶体敷料预防PICC 置管后机械性静脉炎的效果观察[J].护理研究(上旬版)，2013，27（7）：1974-1975
|
| [7] |
邹晓春，何金爱，宋燕伶.252 例留置静脉中长导管病人调查分析[J].护理学报，2016，23（20）：48-50．
|
| [8] |
Prasanna N，Yamane D，Haridasa N，et al.Safety and efficacy of vasopressor administration through midline catheters[J].J Crit Care，2021，61：1-4.
|
| [9] |
中国研究型医院学会护理分会项目组.中等长度静脉导管临床应用专家共识[J].中华护理杂志，2020，55（supplement）：43-50.
|
| [10] |
傅麒宁，吴洲鹏，孙文彦，等.《输液导管相关静脉血栓形成中国专家共识》临床实践推荐[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志，2020，4：412-418.
|
| [11] |
Moureau N，Chopra V.Indications for peripheral，midline and central catheters：summary of the MAGIC recommendations[J].Br J Nurs，2016，25（8）：15-24.
|
| [12] |
殷磊.护理学基础[M].北京：人民卫生出版社.1999：256.
|
| [13] |
国家卫生健康委办公厅医政医管局.《血管导管相关感染预防与控制指南（2021 版）》[J].中国感染控制杂志，2021，20（4）：387-388.
|
| [14] |
潘建美.血管活性药物不良反应原因分析及护理对策[J].护士进修杂志，2012，24（5）：246-247.
|
| [15] |
周传亭.药物致输液性静脉炎的原因及防治研究进展[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志，2020，23（5）：197-198.
|
| [16] |
Chopra V，Flanders SA，Saint S，et al.The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters （MAGIC）：Results From a Multispecialty Panel Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method[J].Ann Intern Med，2015，163（6）：1-40.
|
| [17] |
金毅，王平，王晓伟.血管刺激性试验方法探讨[J].广东科技，2012，3（5）：191.
|
| [18] |
徐晓芳.集束化护理对ICU 中心静脉导管感染的预防效果分析[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志，2019，6（35）：63.
|
| [19] |
刘玮，刘秉诚，杨平.血液透析导管相关性感染原因分析及护理对策[J].齐鲁护理杂志，2020，26（23）：73-75.
|
| [20] |
徐燕琳，朱虹，吴玮，等.慢性肾衰竭行腹膜透析患者导管感染的相关因素及病原学分析[J].中华医院感染学杂志，2019，29（1）：149-152.
|
| [21] |
马惠萍，孙玲，王凤侠,等.某医院导管相关性感染预防措施执行情况及感染率评价分析[J].中国消毒学杂志，2021，38（2）：119-122，126.
|
|
|
|
