即刻种植修复及残根保存修复治疗牙体缺损患者的临床研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (17)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (32 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Objective To explore and compare the clinical effects of immediate implant restoration and residual root preservation restoration in the treatment of patients with dental defects.Methods A total of 100 patients with dental defects treated in the Department of Stomatology,Airport Hospital of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital from January 2019 to June 2020 were selected as the research objects.They were divided into control group and experimental group according to the computer grouping method,with 50 cases in each group.The control group was treated with residual root preservation repair,and the experimental group with immediate implant repair.The cure,oral function score,clinical efficacy,complications and satisfaction of the two groups were compared.Results The oral function score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The satisfaction of experimental group was higher than that of control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The total effective rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The comparison of immediate implant restoration and residual root preservation and restoration shows that implant restoration has better clinical effects,which can effectively improve the oral function of patients with tooth defects,immediate improve the cure rate and patient satisfaction,and have a low incidence of complications.

Key words： Implant restoration Residual root preservation and restoration Tooth defect Clinical effect

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	SHI Fu-qiao
	ZENG Xian-huan
	ZHANG Xin-lu
	CHEN Bei-si
	YUN Hui-yuan

Cite this article:

SHI Fu-qiao,ZENG Xian-huan,ZHANG Xin-lu, et al. Clinical comparative analysis of immediate implant restoration and residual root preservation restoration in the treatment of patients with dental defects[J]. 中国当代医药, 2021, 28(32): 137-139转143.

URL:

http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/ OR http://dangdaiyiyao.com/EN/Y2021/V28/I32/137

[1]	彭时雨.探讨种植修复及残根保存修复治疗牙齿缺损患者的临床疗效[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志，2019，6（22）：38-39.
[2]	朱彦红，朱元媛.牙齿残根保存修复与拔除后种植修复的临床效果对比[J].中外医疗，2017，36（1）：95-97.
[3]	逄廷洲.比较种植修复及残根保存修复治疗牙齿缺损患者的临床疗效[J].影像研究与医学应用，2017，1（18）：200-201.
[4]	马继瑞.对比牙齿残根保存修复、拔除后种植修复的实际应用效果[J].心理医生，2019，25（1）：56.
[5]	许振峰.牙体缺损至龈下残根的正畸修复联合治疗效果评估[J].实用医技杂志，2020，27（4）：85-86.
[6]	姜红玉.种植修复及残根保存修复治疗牙齿缺损患者的教学体会[J].中国卫生产业，2018，15（36）：140-141.
[7]	付汉斌.牙齿残根保存修复与拔除后种植修复的临床效果对比分析[J].世界临床医学，2017，11（14）：166.
[8]	陶芳红.对比牙齿残根保存修复与拔除后种植修复的临床应用效果[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志，2018，5（31）：98，110.
[9]	赵春艳，王承霖.牙体缺损至龈下残根的正畸修复联合治疗效果[J].中国民康医学，2018，30（6）：67-68，87.
[10]	王伟.比较牙齿残根保存修复与种植修复的临床应用[J].智慧健康，2018，5（17）：114-115.
[11]	姜美鹏，周学文，黄永崇.下颌后牙残根即刻种植的临床应用效果研究[J].现代诊断与治疗，2017，28（13）：2457-2458.
[12]	杨曲莲.对比分析牙齿残根保存修复、拔除后种植修复的临床效果[J].养生保健指南，2019，3（2）：90.
[13]	王京京.种植修复与残根保存修复治疗牙齿缺损的效果比较[J].黑龙江医药，2020，33（1）：172-174.
[14]	亓霞.牙齿残根保存修复与拔除后种植修复的临床效果对比[J].全科口腔医学杂志（电子版），2018，5（33）：71-72.
[15]	黄丰.采用种植牙修复牙列缺损的临床效果[J].中国医学创新，2019，16（15）：135-138.
[16]	王风，秦江山.对比牙齿残根保存、拔除后种植的临床修复效果[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志，2018，5（8）：50，52.
[17]	王英翔.口腔种植修复与固定义齿修复治疗牙列缺损的临床效果[J].中国当代医药，2019，26（8）：132-134.