|
|
|
| Application effect of moderate perineal protection delivery method in natural childbirth |
| ZOU Qing-hua DUAN Hui-fang YANG Dong-lai ZHANG Lei |
| Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jiujiang University Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Province, Jiujiang 332000,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the application effect of moderate perineal protection delivery method in natural childbirth. Methods A total of 160 parturients who underwent natural childbirth in the Jiujiang University Affiliated Hospital from January 2019 to July 2020 were selected as the research subjects, they were divided into the control group and the observation group by random number table method, 80 cases in each group. The control group was given unprotected perineal delivery method, and the observation group was given moderate perineal protection delivery method. The degree of perineal laceration, postpartum 24 h pain (visual analog scale [VAS] score), the occurrence of perinea lateral incision, postpartum hemorrhage, and neonatal status (asphyxia rate, weight, Apgar score) were compared between the two groups. Results The rate of perineal laceration，postpartum 24 h VAS score, incidence rate of perineal lateral resection and incidence rate of postpartum hemorrhage in observation group were lower than those in control group, the differences were statistically significant (P＜0.05). There were no significant differences in neonatal asphyxia rate and body weight between the two groups (P＞0.05). The neonatal Apgar score of observation group was higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). Conclusion Moderate perineal protection delivery method has a significant application effect in natural childbirth. And it can effectively reduce the occurrence of maternal perineal laceration, perineotomy, postpartum hemorrhage and pain. It is helpful to improve the physiological status of newborns, thus it is recommended for clinical application.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
曾丽容，梁燕嫦，吴结英，等.无保护会阴接生技术对正常分娩初产妇的临床价值探讨[J].吉林医学，2020，41（7）：1680-1681.
|
| [2] |
王丹.无保护会阴接生联合演示性沟通在经阴道分娩初产妇中的应用价值[J].河南医学研究，2020，29（20）：3713-3715.
|
| [3] |
王红媛，刘圆圆，杨鑫，等.会阴无保护接生技术联合控制胎头娩出速度在低危孕妇正常分娩中的应用效果评价[J].中国药物与临床，2020，20（23）：3929-3931.
|
| [4] |
王玲.自由体位待产联合吊台接生在产妇分娩中的应用[J].护理实践与研究，2020，17（21）：107-108.
|
| [5] |
郑萍，夏小桃，丁海燕.会阴无保护接生技术在低危孕妇正常分娩的价值[J].中国计划生育学杂志，2020，28（2）：291-293.
|
| [6] |
冉秀文，官婵婵，徐思思，等.自由体位配合无创接生对初产妇分娩结局的影响[J].中国医药导报，2020，17（3）：94-97.
|
| [7] |
王红霞.无保护会阴接生技术与控制胎头娩出在自然分娩初产妇中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志，2019，25（2）：105-107.
|
| [8] |
潘伟芳，颜玉华，李霞，等.可塑性会阴保护器在阴道分娩中的应用[J].中国现代医生，2008，46（13）：51,53.
|
| [9] |
罗薇，杨秩，赖文莉.视觉模拟评分法评价多个临床因素对正畸初始疼痛的影响[J].实用口腔医学杂志，2007，23（6）：867-870.
|
| [10] |
张秀军，李茉，张泽坤，等.新生儿1 分钟Apgar 评分及其影响因素[J].中华流行病 学 杂志，2007，28（8）：794-794.
|
| [11] |
李佳颖，郑佩玉，钟雅晶，等.双侧阴部神经阻滞联合无保护会阴接生法用于第二产程中分娩效果的Meta 分析[J].解放军护理杂志，2019，36（3）：11-15.
|
| [12] |
杨盼盼，王娜娜，翟修银.两种助产方案在初产妇第二产程中的应用效果比较[J].齐鲁护理杂志，2019，25（20）：99-101.
|
| [13] |
牟兰芳，沈萍华，吴丽敏.自由体位联合无保护会阴接生技术在第二产程中的应用[J].护理与康复，2019，18（1）：50-53.
|
| [14] |
付秋鹏，何银芳，高连峰，等.不同分娩镇痛方式对妊娠结局影响的研究进展[J].中国全科医学，2020，23（10）：1318-1322.
|
| [15] |
陈世荣，王双，周欣.Ritgen 接生手法在初产妇经阴道分娩中的临床应用[J].现代妇产科进展，2020，29（4）：298-300.
|
|
|
|
