|
|
Effect of small incision non-phacoemulsification extracapsular extraction in the treatment of senile cataract and its influence on vision |
DU Wei-feng HAN Ying-jun CHEN Jian-li SUN Dan |
Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Renhe Hospital, Beijing 102600, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To observe the effect of small incision non-phacoemulsification extracapsular excision in the treatment of senile cataract and its influence on vision.Methods A total of 76 elderly cataract patients who were admitted to the Department of Ophthalmology of Renhe Hospital of Beijing from February 2018 to April 2020 were selected as the research objects, and they were divided into a conventional group (38 cases) and a study group (38 cases) according to the random number table method.Patients in the conventional group used phacoemulsification and extracapsular phacoemulsification patients in the study group used small incision non-phacoemulsification extracapsular extraction.The intraocular pressure, visual acuity and adverse reactions of patients of the two groups were compared.Results The comparison of the intraocular pressure before treatment between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05);the intraocular pressure after treatment in the conventional group was higher than that before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);the intraocular pressure after treatment in the study group was higher than that before treatment, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);the intraocular pressure of the study group at 2, 6, 12 and 24h after treatment was lower than that of the conventional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The visual acuity comparison between the two groups before treatment and 3 months after treatment was not statistically significant (P>0.05);the visual acuity after treatment in the conventional group was higher than that before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);The visual acuity after treatment in the study group was higher than that before treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);the visual acuity of the study group was higher than that of the conventional group at 1 week after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The total incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower than that in the routine group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion In the choice of treatment for elderly cataract patients, small-incision non-phacoemulsification extracapsular extirpation can be taken into consideration, which is safe and effective and worthy of application.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
赵永旺,彭清华,唐云骢,等.改良小切口非超声乳化白内障囊外摘除联合人工晶状体植入治疗硬核白内障的临床观察[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2018,36(1):46-49.
|
[2] |
刘铮,谭少健,刘金华,等.超声乳化术与无缝线大切口白内障囊外摘除术对硬核白内障的早期疗效观察[J].广西医科大学学报,2015,32(2):260-262.
|
[3] |
王娜,赵奎卿,赵丽萍,等.小切口囊外摘除术与超声乳化吸除术治疗老年白内障的疗效[J].现代生物医学进展,2015,15(32):6328-6330.
|
[4] |
罗淑芳,张晓,罗蓓蓓,等.超声乳化联合小梁切除术治疗老年青光眼合并白内障的临床效果及对眼压,视力的影响[J].解放军医药杂志,2020,32(5):104-107.
|
[5] |
鲍忠宝.小切口白内障囊外摘除术与白内障超声乳化术在硬核白内障中的治疗效果对比研究[J].湖南中医药大学学报,2018,39(1):444-445.
|
[6] |
孙占昆,朱卫华,王红燕,等.小切口白内障囊外摘除联合人工晶状体植入术在防盲治盲中的应用效果分析[J].湖南中医药大学学报,2018,39(1):449-450.
|
[7] |
成磊,刘杏,钟毅敏,等.显微超声乳化白内障吸除联合人工晶状体植入术治疗晶状体悬韧带异常继发性闭角型青光眼疗效分析[J].中华显微外科杂志,2016,39(4):404-407.
|
[8] |
黄晓峰.超声乳化白内障吸除联合房角分离术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼合并白内障的疗效观察[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2017,41(3):352-354.
|
[9] |
冯晶晶,么莉,安磊,等.我国白内障摘除手术效果及影响因素分析[J].中华眼科杂志,2021,57(1):63-70.
|
[10] |
张爽,高玉敬,洪云,等.超声乳化术与小切口非超声乳化术治疗老年性白内障的临床疗效[J].中国医药导刊,2017,5(46):14-15.
|
[11] |
赵春燕,张海峰,张雪琴,等.小切口囊外摘除术与超声乳化术治疗老年膨胀期白内障疗效比较[J].实用老年医学,2020,34(2):53-55.
|
[12] |
薛丹,高建华,崔睿,等.小切口非超声乳化与超声乳化在白内障治疗中的临床分析[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2017,28(1):459-460.
|
[13] |
张健,梁春萍.在流动手术车中改良角巩缘切口超乳术和手法小切口白内障囊外摘除术的比较[J].国际眼科杂志,2017,17(11):2085-2088.
|
[14] |
刘广源,刘家佳,温跃春,等.重力液流与主控液流对白内障超声乳化术术后视力恢复及视觉质量的影响[J].安徽医药,2020,24(6):81-84.
|
[15] |
王俊杰,卢勇攀,许伶伶,等.小切口非超声乳化吸除术和超声乳化吸除术用于年龄相关性白内障的临床研究[J].浙江医学,2018,40(12):84-87.
|
|
|
|