|
|
Analysis of the causes and influence factors of red blood cell spill-out caused by apheresis platelets in the voluntary blood donation at blood station |
WANG Li-hua |
Department of Physical Examinations and Collection, Ji′ning Blood Center, Shandong Province, Ji′ning 272000, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the reasons and related influence factors of red blood cell spill-out caused by apheresis platelets (PLT) in the voluntary blood donation at blood stations. Methods A total of 1532 voluntary blood donors who donated PLT at the blood station in Ji′ning Blood Center, Shandong Province from January 2020 to January 2021 were selected as the research subjects. The status of RBC spill-out caused by apheresis PLT was counted, and the related influence factors of red blood cell spill-out caused by apheresis PLT were analyzed. Results Among the 1532 cases of voluntary blood donors, a total of 60 cases had red blood cell spill-out phenomenon, and the red blood cell spill-out rate of apheresis PLT was 3.92%. Single factor analysis showed that the differences of deposited (HCT),count of red blood cells (RBC), the average amount of hemoglobin (MCH), average red blood cell volume (MCV), mean hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) level, blood fat ratio, stress ratio and supplies operating errors of the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that HCT increased (β=2.735, OR=9.784, 95%CI=3.272-18.095), RBC increased (β=2.262, OR=5.611, 95%CI=1.818-12.487), MCH decreased (β=2.097, OR=8.143,95%CI=3.178-16.205), MCV decreased (β=2.219, OR=6.053, 95%CI=1.028-9.099), MCHC decreased (β=3.797, OR=34.571, 95%CI=14.47-107.231), fat blood (β=2.856, OR=23.063, 95%CI=10.028-69.033), mental stress (β=2.436, OR=17.053, 95%CI=9.028-57.059), consumable operation error (β=2.052, OR=7.053, 95%CI=2.028-15.091) were risk factors of the red blood cell spill-out of apheresis PLT (P<0.05). Conclusion The red blood cell spill-out caused by apheresis PLT in the voluntary blood donation of blood stations is closely related to the increase of HCT, the increase of red blood cell, the decrease of MCH, MCV and MCHC, fat blood in the blood of patients, mental stress, and consumable operation error. In clinical practice, targeted measures should be taken to eliminate the influence factors so as to reduce red blood cell spill-out caused by apheresis PLT.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
周娟,居兵.MCS+、Amicus、Trima 血细胞分离机采集双份血小板的效果比较[J].山东医药,2019,59(15):73-75.
|
[2] |
龚道方,龙海波,刘昭国,等.临床276 例次单采血小板输注效果及相关因素分析[J].临床输血与检验,2018,20(4):365-368.
|
[3] |
万珈妤,陈红,户桂英.舒适护理在首次单采血小板捐献者中 的应用效果[J].中国当代医 药,2019,26(13):204-206.
|
[4] |
王欣,王子瑞.机采血小板对献血者血常规参数的影响[J].安徽医药,2019,23(5):981-983.
|
[5] |
李娟,张小华,姚文雅.“一对一”谈心模式在首次机采血小板护理中的应用价值[J].检验医学与临床,2020,17(5):700-702.
|
[6] |
许虹,张剑英,张柳明,等.无偿献血者参与机采血小板捐献的现状及影响因素分析[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(9):1534-1537.
|
[7] |
符小玲,蔡兴权,夏兰,等.血液病患者单采血小板输注疗效的影响因素分析[J].现代生物医学进展,2018,18(16):3166,3167-3169.
|
[8] |
张玲玲,尹文,肖凤静,等.单采血小板捐献者献血前血液筛查不合格因素分析[J].细胞与分子免疫学杂志,2020,36(2):164-168.
|
[9] |
何燕芳,罗世彬,韦洁明.机采血小板采集计划与临床供血效果分析[J].检验医学与临床,2019,16(10):1439-1440.
|
[10] |
周璐.三种血细胞分离机机采血小板耗材残余血量分析[J].中国输血杂志,2018,31(4):426-428.
|
[11] |
赵冬梅,杨金本,曾凤芹,等.单采血小板制品临床疗效分析与预约模式建立[J].河北医药,2017,39(10):1570-1572.
|
[12] |
陈吉章,胡萍,康建勋.成都市2010-2015年机采血小板献血者的调查研究[J].国际输血及血液学杂志,2017,40(3):214-218.
|
[13] |
陈乐丹,李建道,苏欣欣.单采血小板献血者血液初筛不合格原因的初步分析[J].中国输血杂志,2019,32(9):934-936.
|
[14] |
王伟,薛丽,周群刚,等.采集参数修改对改善血小板冲红的研究[J].临床输血与检验,2018,20(4):347-350.
|
[15] |
单泓,王姣杰,刘敏,等.重复捐献机采血小板对献血者Plt 及凝血功能的影响[J].中国输血杂志,2019,32(11):1188-1189.
|
|
|
|