|
|
Influence of episiotomy and natural laceration on pelvic floor function of primipara after natural childbirth |
WANG Ying SUN Bei SUN Lin LI Hai-ying |
Delivery Room, Chunliuyuan District of Dalian Women and Children Medical Center (Group) |
|
|
Abstract Objective To explore the influence of episiotomy and natural laceration on pelvic floor function of primipara after natural delivery.Methods The clinical data of 68 primiparas with natural childbirth in Dalian Women and Children Medical Center from August 2019 to August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.They were divided into the lateral episiotomy group (34 cases) and the natural perineal laceration group (34 cases) according to different midwifery methods.Episiotomy was performed in the lateral episiotomy group, and perineal laceration occurred in the natural perineal laceration group.The pelvic floor function, perineal pain, pelvic floor myoelectric value, sexual function and complications of the two groups at 42 days after delivery were compared.Results There was no significant difference in pelvic floor function between the two groups (P>0.05).The visual analogue scale (VAS) score of the lateral episiotomy group was higher than that of the natural perineal laceration group, and the pelvic floor myoelectric value of the lateral episiotomy group was lower than that of the natural perineal laceration group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The scores of sexual arousal, vaginal lubrication, orgasm and sexual life satisfaction of the female sexual function index (FSFI) in the lateral episiotomy group were lower than those in the natural laceration group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).The total incidence of complications in the lateral episiotomy group was 26.47%, which was higher than 5.88% in the natural laceration group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Lateral episiotomy can prevent severe perineal laceration caused by natural childbirth, but it is more likely to damage basin muscles and nerves of primipara than natural perineal laceration, aggravate perineal wound pain,and reduce the quality of sexual life.Prenatal examination should be carried out for primipara to avoid hand abuse affecting patients′ physical and mental health.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
赵娜,蒋小芒.会阴侧切以及自然裂伤对初产妇第二产程、产后性功能、盆底肌力和肌电位的影响[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2018,19(5):457-458.
|
[2] |
郭仁妃,吴燕,王爱宝,等.不同分娩方式产妇产后阴道收缩力及性生活质量比较研究[J].重庆医学,2017,46(26):3696-3698.
|
[3] |
胡方方,张艺凡,崔海涛,等.会阴侧切对初产妇产后早期盆底康复疗效的影响[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2017,31(6):568-570.
|
[4] |
刘文聪,张鹏,李海燕,等.超声评价不同分娩方式对盆底结构和功能的影响及康复治疗的效果[J].河北医科大学学报,2018,39(10):1193-1196,1200.
|
[5] |
刘开宏,郝洁倩.生物反馈电刺激联合盆底肌训练治疗女性盆底器官脱垂的疗效观察[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2017,39(9):694-697.
|
[6] |
骆艳丽,吴文源,李春波,等.医学结局研究用疼痛量表在腰痛患者中的信效度初步研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(11):713-715.
|
[7] |
楼青青,张琴薇,姚慧岚,等.女性性功能量表的汉化及其信效度评价[J].中国实用护理杂志,2013,29(10):23-26.
|
[8] |
周金英,戴莺莺,邹菁菁,等.自然分娩与剖宫产对初产妇产后早期盆底肌电值及肌力的影响比较[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(8):1396-1398.
|
[9] |
徐碧荣,黄晓安,夏明珠,等.无创助产技术与会阴侧切术的临床效果比较[J].中国妇幼保健,2020,35(17):3299-3301.
|
[10] |
郭华峰,杨俊娟,张新华,等.不同分娩方式产妇产后早期盆底功能影响因素分析[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2020,55(1):123-126.
|
[11] |
丁金玉,刘雪琴,李龙倜,等.阴道分娩产妇不同助产方式的应用效果及盆底功能评估[J].海军医学杂志,2020,41(6):714-716.
|
[12] |
张艳,易念华,吴兰,等.不同分娩方式对产后早期盆底功能的影响及康复治疗效果评估[J].华中科技大学学报(医学版),2014,43(3):351-355.
|
[13] |
吴珊,陈晓辉.会阴侧切对初产妇盆底肌功能和性功能影响的随访观察[J].中国性科学,2018,27(8):96-99.
|
[14] |
胡孟彩,郑雪芹,赵冰,等.会阴侧切初产妇产后6~8 周盆底功能和盆底器官脱垂观察[J].山东医药,2017,57(35):53-55.
|
[15] |
陈磊,杨明芳,刘丛丛,等.不同分娩方式产后出血量估计的差异[J].北京医学,2017,39(3):249-252.
|
|
|
|