|
|
Clinical effect of compound technology in the treatment of aortic dissection |
CAI Long-ren WU Cheng LI Yan PENG Xing-hua ZHONG Feng-wen |
Department of Cardiac Surgery,Ganzhou People′s Hospital,Jiangxi Province,Ganzhou 341000,China |
|
|
Abstract Objective To investigate the clinical effect of compound technology in the treatment of aortic dissection.Methods Thirty patients with aortic dissection admitted to Ganzhou People′s Hospital from January 2015 to March 2020 were selected as the research objects.They were divided into a control group and a study group according to the lottery method,with 15 cases in each group.The control group was given chimney technique + aortic stent graft treatment,and the study group was given compound technique treatment.The surgical indicators,liver and kidney function indicators before and after surgery,postoperative complications,deaths during follow-up and occurrence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time of the study group was longer than that of the reference group,the hospital stay was shorter than that of the reference group,and the medical expense was lower than that of the reference group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05); the comparison of intraoperative blood loss between the two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Before and after operation,there were no significant differences in liver and renal function indexes between two groups(P>0.05).The levels of glutamic oxalacetic transaminase,glutamic pyruvic transaminase,serum creatinine and serum urea in the study group were higher than those before operation,the levels of glutamic oxalacetic transaminase,glutamic pyruvic transaminase and serum urea in control group were higher than before operation,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).During the follow-up period,there was no death in the two groups,and there was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Compound technique in the treatment of aortic dissection can shorten the length of hospital stay,reduce medical costs,and do not cause obvious damage to liver and kidney function,the prognosis is good,worthy of extensive use.
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
蔡隆仁,罗骏,吉灵,等.经皮主动脉腔内修复术治疗主动脉夹层的效果分析[J].中国当代医药,2016,23(23):53-55.
|
[2] |
杜容宇,靳永欣,马银龙.去分支复合手术与孙氏手术治疗急性Stanford A 型主动脉夹层患者的对比研究[J].临床研究,2020,28(6):12-14.
|
[3] |
赵纪春,胡翰魁.复合手术处理主动脉夹层弓部病变策略[J].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2016,8(1):14-15.
|
[4] |
左健,李凯,郭坚,等.复合技术在主动脉夹层中的应用[J].血管与腔内血管外科杂志,2016,2(5):P.361-364.
|
[5] |
黄烨,张立伟,张郁林,等.复合手术在主动脉夹层二期手术中的应用[J].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2019,11(1):33-36.
|
[6] |
赵应录,王玮璠,王炜,等.两种术式治疗Stanford A 型主动脉夹层的病例对照研究[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2019,26(7):664-669.
|
[7] |
闵心平,徐鹏,昌金星,等.复合手术在复杂主动脉弓部病变中的应用[J].心肺血管病杂志,2019,8(10):1036-1040.
|
[8] |
乌兰,党永康.主动脉夹层治疗进展[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019,19(22):123-124.
|
[9] |
程再轩.Stanford B 型胸主动脉夹层患者应用覆膜支架腔内隔绝术对预后及主动脉重塑的影响观察[J].中国医学工程,2019,27(12):105-107.
|
[10] |
尹伶俐,肖雪青,尹腾飞.优质护理在Stanford B 型胸主动脉夹层患者覆膜支架腔内隔绝术的应用体会[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2018,39(14):102-104.
|
[11] |
叶仕高,刘永春.主动脉夹层的治疗研究进展[J].中国医学创新,2019,16(12):175-178.
|
[12] |
尹洪顺,陈开,李拥军.Ⅲ型主动脉夹层腔内治疗术中并发症的处理1 例报告[J].血管与腔内血管外科杂志,2018,4(1):91-94.
|
[13] |
张良,于存涛,常谦,等.杂交全弓替换术治疗主动脉A型夹层的早中期结果[J].中华血管外科杂志,2018,3(1):15-21.
|
[13] |
李翔,陈光,赵文军.A 型主动脉夹层手术的临床应用探讨[J].中国现代医生,2019,57(10):22-25.
|
[14] |
张良,王德,丘俊涛,等.杂交技术治疗DeBakeyⅠ型夹层的早中期结果[J].中华血管外科杂志,2020,5(1):30-37.
|
[15] |
任伟,王志维,吴智勇,夏军,李博文,昌金星.复合手术治疗主动脉弓部疾病的临床疗效[J].武汉大学学报(医学版),2017,38(2):302-305.
|
[16] |
陆清声.主动脉弓疾病腔内治疗体外开窗技巧[J].中国血管外科杂志(电子版),2019,11(2):83-85.
|
[17] |
严文俊,韩冬,薛东明,等.单纯主动脉腔内隔绝术治疗累及弓部Stanford B 型主动脉夹层的效果观察[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2018,5(22):4-5.
|
[18] |
廖亿粦,黄典,廖益永,等.主动脉夹层Stanford A 型主动脉弓置换加降主动脉支架植入术深低温体外循环麻醉处理[J].陕西医学杂志,2017,8(46):30-31.
|
[19] |
张建,邹金梅.主动脉腔内隔绝术在急性主动脉综合征中的临床应用(附48 例报告)[J].实用临床医学,2018,19(11):45-46.
|
[20] |
王玮璠,徐旭,王炜,等.Stanford A 型主动脉夹层复合手术与主动脉弓置换支架“象鼻”手术的疗效对比[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,2019,35(2):99-101.
|
|
|
|